Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello! Can i have JP crew opinion on these two please. Thanks again!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12433[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]12434[/ATTACH]
    Hi, both are oversharp, especially the biz jet.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
      Hello B7772ADL, i reduced sharpness on both, what do you think:

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12446[/ATTACH]

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12447[/ATTACH]

      And also this one please:

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]12448[/ATTACH]
      1: sharpening is better, but the photo is overexposed
      2: contrast
      3: OK
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Hello! Can i have JP crew opinion on these four please. Thanks again!

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12475[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12476[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12477[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]12478[/ATTACH]
        1. borderline contrast
        2. borderline oversharpened
        3. borderline contrast
        4. contrast, backlit

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          Thanks for you help as always dlowwa.

          Can i have your opinion on these photos please:

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12497[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12498[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12499[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12500[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12501[/ATTACH]
          First is somewhat oversharpened, and horizontal tail stab looks cut off (inlcude stab or make a closer crop in which the a/c is centered left/right). A/c in the second photo is mostly in the shadow of the hangar and would probably lead to a contrast rejection. third has a too harsh contrast, one side very dark and other overexposed. fourth looks somewhat overexposed (mainly front part). Fifth looks acceptable

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
            Hello Pamela, i follow your advice about the A330. Is it better?

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12527[/ATTACH]

            Can you give me your opinion on these also:

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12528[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12529[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]12530[/ATTACH]

            Thanks again!
            Quality looks acceptable on all of these.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
              Hello Pamela, is this crop acceptable? Any other issues?

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12545[/ATTACH]

              Thanks for all your advices this year and i wish you a Happy 2018!
              Crop is ok, top of the fuselage seems a bit overexposed?

              Happy 2018 to you too! And i am sure other screeners are happy to give you advice too just make your post non-screener specific

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                Hello!

                Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13518[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13519[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13520[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13525[/ATTACH]
                First three would be considered similar, so please pick one. Last one probably ok, though the DOF is a bit low.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                  Hello!

                  Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! The motive is acceptable? Thanks!

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]13587[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]13588[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]13589[/ATTACH]
                  1 & 3 would be similar, assuming it's the same aircraft. They both also have a bit of blur, so smaller than 1600 might be a good idea. Second one probably ok.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                    Hello!
                    This one was rejected due to Undersharpened (Soft). Is it better? Or is it better upload a smaller size? Thanks!

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13689[/ATTACH]
                    The only part of the image that is sharp is the center. Towards the edges (nose, tail) are all very soft, probably out of focus. Not sure you can fix that.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                      Hello!

                      Can any JP screener please pre-screen this photo! Thanks!

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]13696[/ATTACH]
                      Borderline contrast, and tail is soft/blurry.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                        Hello dlowwa, i choose a photo from a different angle., is it better? Thanks!

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]13706[/ATTACH]
                        Not much better I'm afraid, for the same reasons.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                          Hello!

                          Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13771[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13772[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]13773[/ATTACH]
                          1. borderline contrast
                          2. soft, and motive-ish..almost as much about the car park as the ramp
                          3. borderline oversharpened

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                            Hello!

                            Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos and tell me which one is better for upload. Thanks!

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13837[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]13838[/ATTACH]
                            Both lack contrast and are soft in spots, so I don't see one as being better than the other.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                              Hello!

                              Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos and tell me which one is better for upload. Thanks!

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14068[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14069[/ATTACH]
                              Please pick the one you want to upload and show it here. Thanks.
                              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                                I like this one more:

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14071[/ATTACH]
                                Low DOF might be an issue as it appears softer closer to the camera.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X