Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners, about this rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7993489) with contrast issues, is this one acceptable:

    Thanks!
    Unfortunately not acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners, about this rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7993489) with contrast issues, is this one acceptable:

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners, please prescreen this one. Is heat haze a relevant issue? Thanks!
    Yes, heat haze (and contrast/color) would be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners, please prescreen this one. Is heat haze a relevant issue? Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners, just a question, is this one considered backlit? I don't think so, but just want to be sure. Thanks
    Not quite, but it has other issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners, just a question, is this one considered backlit? I don't think so, but just want to be sure. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello, about this one (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7882404) rejected due to Dark / Underexposed ( i've tried to correct it on the new version bellow) and due to Window Glare / Dirt - is it due to the effect of the light on the fog? I don't understand the last reason of rejection. Thanks!
    Whoever screened it deemed the glare coming off the beacons/wingtip collision lights to be too distracting. Same as I said above, it's a subjective call for both issues; your image was seen and rejected by two screeners, so it seems my opinion is in the minority

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello, about this one (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7882404) rejected due to Dark / Underexposed ( i've tried to correct it on the new version bellow) and due to Window Glare / Dirt - is it due to the effect of the light on the fog? I don't understand the last reason of rejection. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post

    Hello dlowwa, i've tried to fix the issues, is it acceptable now? Thanks
    This version would be ok for me, though some might subjectively find the overall image too dark (even if it's not technically underexposed).

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Exposure should be ok, but contrast, color, and horizon might be issues.
    Hello dlowwa, i've tried to fix the issues, is it acceptable now? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen this one. Exposure ok? Thanks!
    Exposure should be ok, but contrast, color, and horizon might be issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen this one. Exposure ok? Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen this one. Thanks!
    borderline dark, but worth a try.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Crew, please pre-screen this one. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners, about this "similar photo" rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7800178

    What are the rejection criteria for this type of "ramp" photos when we already have uploaded "ramp" photos of this airport. I'm asking because in this case, the ramp as different types of aircraft (not just the registrations), for example the A340 which is a rare visitor here. Do JP have a minimum waiting period before we can upload new ramp photos? Thanks for clarifying.
    Images more than 5-6 years apart are generally not considered similar.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X