Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello!

    Can any JP screener please pre-screen this photo! Thanks!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14587[/ATTACH]
    Any advice here please =) thanks!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
      Hello!

      Can any JP screener please pre-screen this photo! Thanks!

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]14587[/ATTACH]
      Looks OK here.
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Hello!

        Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15267[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15268[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15269[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15270[/ATTACH]
        1-3 will be rejected for poor contrast

        2 : a bit too soft

        4 : needs a tad more contrast

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          Hello!

          Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15273[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15274[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15275[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15276[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15277[/ATTACH]
          Please only post 5 photos every 24 hrs. We will look into these photos at a later moment.
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
            Hello!
            Thanks for the info, i have change some photos, when possible can any JP screener give opinion on these please (first two are night shot):

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15324[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15325[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15326[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15327[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15328[/ATTACH]
            1. borderline soft
            2. borderline soft (tail), and can't really tell about the horizon
            3. borderline heat haze
            4. contrast
            5. ok

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
              Hello!
              When possible can any JP screener give opinion on these please (first two and the last are night shot). Thanks!

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15399[/ATTACH]

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15400[/ATTACH]

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15401[/ATTACH]

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15402[/ATTACH]

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15404[/ATTACH]
              1. borderline soft
              2. ok
              3. borderline oversharpened/heat haze
              4. blurry, noisy
              5. blurry, oversharpened

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                Hello!
                When possible can any JP screener give opinion on these please. Thanks!

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15450[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15451[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15452[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15453[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15454[/ATTACH]
                1. quality ok, but DH4 below is somewhat distracting
                2-3 ok
                4. soft
                5. tail soft/blurry

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                  Hello!
                  When possible can any JP screener give opinion on these please. Thanks again!

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15491[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15492[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15493[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15494[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15495[/ATTACH]
                  1. borderline oversharpened/compression
                  2. blurry, oversharpened, contrast
                  3. ok
                  4. blurry (tail) oversharpened
                  5. ok

                  You might want to limit your size to 1600 (or smaller), since the flaws show up more easily at larger sizes.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                    Hello!
                    When possible can any JP screener give opinion on these please. Thanks again!

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15509[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15510[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15511[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15512[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15513[/ATTACH]
                    1. contrast
                    2. borderline contrast
                    3. contrast, borderline soft
                    4-5 borderline contrast

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                      Hello,
                      This one was rejected due to "Overexposed, Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots, JPG compression artefacts".
                      I tried to fix it, i reduced exposure and sharpness, I don't see any Dust spots (maybe screener was mistaked with the clouds) can anyone please identify them.
                      Is it better for upload?
                      Thanks

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15586[/ATTACH]
                      Acceptable for me.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                        Hello, this one was rejected due to Undersharpened (Soft), is it better?

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15613[/ATTACH]
                        I would reject this for soft. Tail is quite soft, almost blurry.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                          Thanks for the feedback dlowwa.

                          This one was rejected due to Dark / Underexposed and Too much or too little contrast, any better now:

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15615[/ATTACH]
                          Still pretty borderline for contrast, imho.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                            Hello!

                            Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15658[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15659[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15660[/ATTACH]
                            1. ok
                            2. borderline oversharpened
                            3. borderline cut off/oversharpened

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                              Hello dlowwa, is this one better? Thanks

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15665[/ATTACH]
                              the chopped of winglet makes it worse.
                              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                                Hello, is this one better? Thanks

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15687[/ATTACH]
                                Right side is blurry.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X