Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Hello, this one was rejected due to vignetting: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6551825

    I can't see vignetting on it, is this rejection correct?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15688[/ATTACH]
    the shadows, mainly on the right, are IMHO not caused by vignetting. You can try to appeal it.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
      Hello!

      Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15754[/ATTACH]

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15755[/ATTACH]

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15756[/ATTACH]
      1-2 vignetting, and borderline soft/dark
      3. contrast

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Hello!

        This one was rejected due to "Bad Quality": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6558306
        Can any JP screener please be more specific about what's wrong with the photo.
        Not sure exactly, but it is a bit blurry/oversharpened, and too strong contrast. Maybe the screener who rejected it will be able to comment better.

        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Also, can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15839[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15840[/ATTACH]

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15841[/ATTACH]
        1. borderline contrast
        2-3 as above

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          Hello!

          Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15947[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15948[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15949[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15950[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]15951[/ATTACH]
          1-2 too dark, 3 looks acceptable, 4-5 too dark/ too strong contrast

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
            Hello!

            Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos! Thanks!

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15988[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15989[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15990[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15991[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15992[/ATTACH]
            1, 3, 5: contrast (shadows too strong, lacking details)
            2: maybe a tad soft and overexposed
            5: OK
            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
              Hello!

              Can any JP screener please pre-screen this photo! Thanks!

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]16095[/ATTACH]
              Eduardo,

              I think this one lacks some contrast...the light is not the best one too.

              Better wait comments from the crew.

              Regards,

              Vinicius

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                Hello!

                Can any JP screener please pre-screen this photo! Thanks!

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16095[/ATTACH]

                Contrast issues on this one are better or it's not fixable?

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16096[/ATTACH]
                1. contrast/backlit. not fixable
                2. contrast/poor light. possibly fixable, but not worth the effort, imho

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                  Thanks Vinicius and dlowwa for your feedback and help!

                  Can any JP screener please pre-screen these 3 photos! Thanks again!

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16150[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16151[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]16152[/ATTACH]
                  All three have issues with contrast/poor light; the last one is the only one that might be fixable.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                    Hello.
                    This one was rejected due to Dark / Underexposed; Too much or too little contrast ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6589767 )

                    I increased exposure and a bit contrast. is it better? Thanks!

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16297[/ATTACH]
                    Still borderline for dark/contrast. Due to the poor light, not much more you can really do.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                      Hello JP community!

                      Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos? About the last one, can i upload it for the Blue Air b737 with this crop? Also, the last 2 photos are considered "night shot" ? Thanks!

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]17660[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]17661[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]17662[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]17663[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]17664[/ATTACH]
                      All look acceptable to me. Night Shot for the first one only.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                        Hello JP community!

                        Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos? Thanks!

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]17727[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]17728[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]17729[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]17730[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]17731[/ATTACH]
                        OlŠ (Hi) Eduardo,

                        IMHO:

                        #1. contrast
                        #2. heat haze
                        #3, #4 and #5 looks ok

                        Better wait more comments from the JP Crew.

                        Cheers,

                        Vinicius

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                          Hello Vinicius, thanks for your opinion.



                          Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]17764[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]17765[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]17766[/ATTACH]
                          1. soft, borderline contrast
                          2. blurry/heat haze, contrast
                          3. borderline contrast, may be a bit blurry toward edges

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                            Hello!
                            Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks!

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17799[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17800[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17801[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17802[/ATTACH]
                            1. now blurry, borderline contrast
                            2. heat haze
                            3. contrast
                            4. borderline heat haze/oversharpened

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                              Hello!
                              Can any JP screener please pre-screen these photos?Are they ok for upload? Thanks again!

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17908[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17909[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17910[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17911[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17912[/ATTACH]
                              1. ok
                              2-3 contrast
                              4-5 borderline soft

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                                Hello dlowwa, are these two any better?

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]17939[/ATTACH]

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]17940[/ATTACH]

                                also is this one ok?

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]17941[/ATTACH]

                                Thanks for your help!
                                First maybe borderline; second almost certainly contrast rejection. Third borderline as well, but maybe passable.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X