Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva

    About the last one, it's military and can transport passengers and cargo, like most of military airplanes.
    Then 'Cargo' category applies.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    Also, regarding to "hot photos", first photo of A319 9H-TLS was uploaded today to JP database, if i photograph and upload tomorrow is it still acceptable as "hot photo"?
    Unless there is some other reason, only the first image of a reg. is considered hot.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
      Hello, are these 2 acceptable on JP database?

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25291[/ATTACH]

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25292[/ATTACH]

      Thanks!
      1. borderline dark/contrast
      2. ok

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Hello, first time getting "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue) on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7336979
        I've read some posts about this rejection on JP Forum but not sure if it applies in this case. Any easy way to see it and correct it on photoshop?
        I've corrected the exposure and tried to correct vignetting, any way to get accepted?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25320[/ATTACH]
        Think the color looks weird because the fuselage is mostly blown out (and the harsh contrast). Fix those issues, and maybe the color won't be a problem.

        Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
        Also, Is vignetting a problem on these 3? Thanks!
        I would consider it a borderline issue, yes. It is noticeable, though can't say for certain whether it would cause a rejection. Trying stopping down your aperture a bit to alleviate the effect. f/6.3 is probably wider than it needs to be.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
          Hello dlowwa, thanks for the advice, i'll try to keep it on f/8 or above.

          Can i ask your opinion on these 4? Acceptable? Thanks again!

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25418[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25419[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25420[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25421[/ATTACH]
          1. color (use sRGB please), borderline contrast
          2. ok
          3. borderline contrast/overexposure
          4. vignetting

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
            Hello dlowwa, i know the light was bad but this one is probably the flight of the year here on the island, 75 years old modified Douglas DC-3 =)
            Any chance to get accepted?

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25503[/ATTACH]
            That would almost certainly be a contrast rejection.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
              Hello Screeners, when possible can you give me your opinion on this one and the photo on the last post? Thanks!

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25640[/ATTACH]
              1. contrast, soft/heat haze
              2. borderline contrast/backlit

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                Hello, is this one acceptable on JP database? Heat Haze is a relevant issue? Thanks!

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25672[/ATTACH]
                Maybe a bit soft, but I don't notice heat haze as being an issue.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                  Hello, this one was rejected due to contrast issues and undersharp: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7369098

                  Is it acceptable now?
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]25700[/ATTACH]
                  Still very borderline for contrast.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                    Hello, are these 3 ok for upload? Thanks JP crew!

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25740[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25741[/ATTACH]

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25742[/ATTACH]
                    1. overexposed, horizon
                    2. borderline soft
                    3. ok

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                      Hello! I reduced exposure and corrected the horizon by the verticals on the left side, is it ok now? Thanks =)

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25747[/ATTACH]
                      Verticals look acceptable but it's still way overexposed (see histogram)

                      Regards
                      Alex

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                        Hello, is this one ok for exposure and verticals (i corrected the horizon by the vertical on the center of the image):

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25804[/ATTACH]

                        Also, i tried some night shots, are they acceptable? Thanks for the feedback!

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25805[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25806[/ATTACH]

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25807[/ATTACH]
                        First three look acceptable to me; last one too dark.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                          Hello JP Crew, are these 4 acceptable on JP database? about the first two, possible overexposure a relevant issue? Thanks!

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25850[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25851[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25852[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25853[/ATTACH]
                          1. overexposed
                          2. overexposed, soft
                          3. obstruction, borderline contrast
                          4. contrast

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                            Dlowwa about the 3rd, the obstruction is the pushback car, part of the motive of the photo, it is really a rejection motive in this case? Other photos have been accepted with this "obstruction". I just want to understand the JP screeners opinion on this type of obstruction.
                            Looks like it's parked, in which case there is no 'scene', just obstruction. If it were actually towing the aircraft, different story.

                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                            Any better this one?

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25884[/ATTACH]
                            No. Not sure this one is fixable.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                              Hello JP Crew, are these 5 acceptable on JP database? Thanks!

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25946[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25947[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25948[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25949[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25950[/ATTACH]
                              1. horizon, borderline heat haze
                              2. backlit
                              3-4 borderline overexposed/contrast
                              5. borderline contrast

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva
                                Hello!
                                These 2 were rejected due to contrast issues:
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7385567
                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7383540

                                The corrected versions:
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25978[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25979[/ATTACH]

                                Any chance of getting accepted? Thanks
                                Contrast a bit harsh on both, but borderline acceptable, for me at least.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X