Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    About registration G-XATW, an A321NX from Titan Airways. Is it considered special scheme? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • 787Dream
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post

    Dear Member, you are missing my point. The main question is not if it's CS100 ou A220. If you are right, then FR24 info is wrong and the JP "auto-fill" option shouldn't allow us to select the A220 option on this aircraft registration....Do I make myself clear now?
    I have reflected your thoughts to other image (id: 10715511) that says A220 for HB-JBI; I think the option showed up due to that image.

    I hope you get a good resolution regarding this issue by resubmitting with correct info. Next time please do not appeal before you asked on forum because the CREWS will stop commenting as part of the forum rules. There are just a set of strict rules that you have to follow. I am sorry.

    I think FR24 would just update the name of aircraft to newest name (I think because they correlate the aircraft type name to ICAO codes) as I have seen many Mitsubishi CRJ on FR24 while Mitsubishi has factually produced 0 CRJ (Bombardier did it on behalf of Mitsubishi).

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Unfortunately for you, you're wrong.
    After Bombardier was taken over by Airbus the aircrafts produced after that date went the A220-100 and A220-300. The aircraft before remain CS-100 and CS-300.
    Dear Member, you are missing my point. The main question is not if it's CS100 ou A220. If you are right, then FR24 info is wrong and the JP "auto-fill" option shouldn't allow us to select the A220 option on this aircraft registration....Do I make myself clear now?

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Crew/Screeners

    I Kindly ask for your attention and action about this unfair rejection case.
    This photo was rejected due to "Bad Info": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10461284
    Screener comment: "CS100". I've appeal for this rejection and explained that this rejection was due to JP upload "auto-fill" error - please check printscreen attached - unfortunately without success. If there is the option to select the A220, why is it considered "bad info"? As you all know, nowadays the aircraft model is the A220, not the CS100. I also check FR24 and the info is A220. So my aircraft info is correct. There is no bad info.
    I Kindly ask JP Crew to analyse this rejection and accept my uploaded photo.
    Thanks.
    Unfortunately for you, you're wrong.
    After Bombardier was taken over by Airbus the aircrafts produced after that date went the A220-100 and A220-300. The aircraft before remain CS-100 and CS-300.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Crew/Screeners

    I Kindly ask for your attention and action about this unfair rejection case.
    This photo was rejected due to "Bad Info": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10461284
    Screener comment: "CS100". I've appeal for this rejection and explained that this rejection was due to JP upload "auto-fill" error - please check printscreen attached - unfortunately without success. If there is the option to select the A220, why is it considered "bad info"? As you all know, nowadays the aircraft model is the A220, not the CS100. I also check FR24 and the info is A220. So my aircraft info is correct. There is no bad info.
    I Kindly ask JP Crew to analyse this rejection and accept my uploaded photo.
    Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10446763

    Is it ok now?

    Thanks!
    Color better, but now borderline overexposed/oversharpened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10446763

    Is it ok now?

    Thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    Kindly ask to pre-screen this photo.

    Thanks!
    Overexposed/contrast, noisy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    Kindly ask to pre-screen this photo.

    Thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    Kindly ask to pre-screen both photos.
    Minor heat haze and some pretty strong banding/compression in the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    Kindly ask to pre-screen both photos.

    Thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    Is composition ok on this one? aircraft is centered for you?
    Aircraft is too high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    Is composition ok on this one? aircraft is centered for you? This topic is very subjective and unfortunately i've had some recent rejections due to this reason...Thanks


    I'm not a screener, but this is a little high.
    I suggest to make both of these lines equal.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    Is composition ok on this one? aircraft is centered for you? This topic is very subjective and unfortunately i've had some recent rejections due to this reason...Thanks


    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    Please pre-screen these 3 photos. Thanks
    1. motive/obstruction, overexposed
    2. overexposed, borderline contrast
    3. soft

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X