Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eduardo Paix„o Silva - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello dlowwa, is it better or still harsh contrast? Thanks
    Contrast still likely to be an issue, imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello dlowwa, is it better or still harsh contrast? Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners

    This one was rejected due to contrast issues: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8781056

    Can Screeners please be more specific with the problem because i can't see the issue. Thanks
    Too much contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners

    This one was rejected due to contrast issues: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8781056

    Can Screeners please be more specific with the problem because i can't see the issue. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners
    Please prescreen this one. Thanks!
    Glare on the left is somewhat distracting. Somewhat noisy, but not an issue for me; aircraft is mostly in the dark, so possible 'dark' rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners
    Please prescreen this one. Thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners
    Is this crop accepted? If so, please pre-screen. Thanks!
    too high in the frame, soft and lacking contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners
    Is this crop accepted? If so, please pre-screen. Thanks!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8689168

    Is it better now? If not, any tip to correct it on photoshop?
    Not really. Don't think it can be fixed.

    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Also, please preescreen the Falcon photo, is it ok? Thanks
    Poor contrast and low in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners
    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8689168

    Is it better now? If not, any tip to correct it on photoshop?
    Also, please preescreen the Falcon photo, is it ok? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners
    Is this crop accepted? Thanks
    Most likely not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners
    Is this crop accepted? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Hello JP Screeners
    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8551500

    Color corrected, is it ok? Thanks
    Color looks better to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello JP Screeners
    About this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8551500

    Color corrected, is it ok? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied


    So indeed, after receiving the raw file, I can confirm it is your processing causing the effect, as the version I created with all settings to zero does not have any halos.

    Your posted image:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	image_34135-eq.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.16 MB ID:	1096977

    My edit from raw:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_7580-eq.jpg Views:	0 Size:	946.5 KB ID:	1096978

    That having been proven, I doubt the halos are strong/noticeable enough to actually cause a rejection.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X