Cristian Quijano - Editing Advice

[crisquijano]

Hi JP Screeners,
Please assess these shots. Thank you for you feedback.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

[crisquijano]

Thank you for the feedback.

2,3 yes... a fish eye

[LX-A343]

Hello JP Crew. Please check these for me. I really would like your feedback as they are kind of unusual.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]16021[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]16022[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]16023[/ATTACH]

4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]16024[/ATTACH]

5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]16025[/ATTACH]

#2 - Used to be USAF/Military. As now it is on display, should the Military type be selected?

#3,4,5 - same aircraft, cut in half and placed in different locations. Are they considered Similar?
On #4, I set the horizon using the door at the back, but it looks leaning CW. So please advice.

thank you!

1, 4, 5: OK
2, 3: look like taken with a wide angle, resulting in a curved aircraft, which looks weird.

3, 4, 5 would not be considered similar

[crisquijano]

Hello JP Crew. Please check these for me. I really would like your feedback as they are kind of unusual.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

#2 - Used to be USAF/Military. As now it is on display, should the Military type be selected?

#3,4,5 - same aircraft, cut in half and placed in different locations. Are they considered Similar?
On #4, I set the horizon using the door at the back, but it looks leaning CW. So please advice.

thank you!

[crisquijano]

thanks a bunch "D

[dlowwa]

Hello again. Please check these for me. thank you.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15872[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15873[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15874[/ATTACH]

1. borderline contrast/color/soft
2. borderline soft
3. horizon (needs cw), soft

[crisquijano]

Hello again. Please check these for me. thank you.

1.

2.

3.

[crisquijano]

thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello. Please pre-screen these for me. thank you.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15822[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15824[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15825[/ATTACH]

4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15826[/ATTACH]

1. contrast
2-3 borderline contrast
4. might need CW

[crisquijano]

Hello. Please pre-screen these for me. thank you.

1.

2.

3.

4.

[crisquijano]

Thank you Dana. I'm glad I checked. best regards.

[dlowwa]

Hello JP crew... I need your advice on these two images.

1. Image hass been rejected twice for being dark. Is there any advise for this one?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557412

2. Similar to above. So I want to make sure it won't go the same path.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15787[/ATTACH]


thank you
cq

Dark perhaps, but I think the problem is rather that the shadows are too strong (harsh contrast). The second would also likely be a dark/contrast rejection.

[crisquijano]

Hello JP crew... I need your advice on these two images.

1. Image hass been rejected twice for being dark. Is there any advise for this one?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557412

2. Similar to above. So I want to make sure it won't go the same path.



thank you
cq

[crisquijano]

Thank you Dana. I actually feel a bit better this one is tricky.

[dlowwa]

Hello JP screeners.

Please advice on this rejection. Based on the antenas it needs CW rotation. But the buildings tell me CCW. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557235

Tricky one...I'd say just a little CW necessary.