Cristian Quijano - Editing Advice

[crisquijano]

Hello JP Crew. Please help me pre-screen with this image, especially because of the tug in front, which is part of the motive. But I couldn't find any specifics in the Upload guidelines, just "...or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

please advise. thank you.

[olandes269]

Hello JP Crew. Please help me pre-screen with this image, especially because of the tug in front, which is part of the motive. But I couldn't find any specifics in the Upload guidelines, just "...or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

please advise. thank you.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15689[/ATTACH]

Hello Cristian,

I'm not screener.

indeed it risks being rejected for two obstructions. The tractor is on the engine but there is also the lighting on the front axle. Difficult to correct !!!

But request confirmation from Dana.

Olivier

[LX-A343]

Hello JP Crew. Please help me pre-screen with this image, especially because of the tug in front, which is part of the motive. But I couldn't find any specifics in the Upload guidelines, just "...or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices."

please advise. thank you.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15689[/ATTACH]

A tow truck like on this photo is acceptable.

[crisquijano]

A tow truck like on this photo is acceptable.

thank you for the feedback.

[crisquijano]

Hello JP screeners.

Please advice on this rejection. Based on the antenas it needs CW rotation. But the buildings tell me CCW. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557235

[dlowwa]

Hello JP screeners.

Please advice on this rejection. Based on the antenas it needs CW rotation. But the buildings tell me CCW. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557235

Tricky one...I'd say just a little CW necessary.

[crisquijano]

Thank you Dana. I actually feel a bit better this one is tricky.

[crisquijano]

Hello JP crew... I need your advice on these two images.

1. Image hass been rejected twice for being dark. Is there any advise for this one?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557412

2. Similar to above. So I want to make sure it won't go the same path.



thank you
cq

[dlowwa]

Hello JP crew... I need your advice on these two images.

1. Image hass been rejected twice for being dark. Is there any advise for this one?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6557412

2. Similar to above. So I want to make sure it won't go the same path.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15787[/ATTACH]


thank you
cq

Dark perhaps, but I think the problem is rather that the shadows are too strong (harsh contrast). The second would also likely be a dark/contrast rejection.

[crisquijano]

Thank you Dana. I'm glad I checked. best regards.

[crisquijano]

Hello. Please pre-screen these for me. thank you.

1.

2.

3.

4.

[dlowwa]

Hello. Please pre-screen these for me. thank you.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15822[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15824[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15825[/ATTACH]

4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15826[/ATTACH]

1. contrast
2-3 borderline contrast
4. might need CW

[crisquijano]

thank you!

[crisquijano]

Hello again. Please check these for me. thank you.

1.

2.

3.

[dlowwa]

Hello again. Please check these for me. thank you.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15872[/ATTACH]

2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15873[/ATTACH]

3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]15874[/ATTACH]

1. borderline contrast/color/soft
2. borderline soft
3. horizon (needs cw), soft