Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pauwelsc - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
    Hey team! I edited these ones... I hope they are acceptable. Thanks

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11460[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11461[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11462[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11463[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11464[/ATTACH]
    1. soft, overprocessed
    2. overprocessed
    3. soft, heat haze
    4. soft
    5. soft, heat haze

    Comment


    • #47
      Hey team, what are your opinions on these ones? Thanks

      1. Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TNL.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1020422 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUUZ.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1020423 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHN.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1020424 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JXD.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1020425 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHR.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020426

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
        Hey team, what are your opinions on these ones? Thanks

        1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11524[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11525[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11526[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11527[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11528[/ATTACH]
        1. Soft, heat haze
        2. Soft
        3. Soft
        4. Soft
        5. Soft, heat haze

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
          1. Soft, heat haze
          2. Soft
          3. Soft
          4. Soft
          5. Soft, heat haze
          I sharpened the pictures who were soft. Is it good now? On my computer it always seems sharper as on the forum.

          1. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUUZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	1020430 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1020431 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JXD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1020432

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
            I sharpened the pictures who were soft. Is it good now? On my computer it always seems sharper as on the forum.

            1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11532[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11533[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11534[/ATTACH]
            All three still soft.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              All three still soft.
              I think this will be my last attempt...

              1. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUUZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.49 MB
ID:	1020433 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.40 MB
ID:	1020434 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JXD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1020435

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                I think this will be my last attempt...

                1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11535[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11536[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11537[/ATTACH]
                1. borderline soft
                2. soft
                3. soft

                Comment


                • #53
                  Hey team! Could you check these ones? Thanks a lot!

                  1. Click image for larger version

Name:	9A-CQF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	967.8 KB
ID:	1020477 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-KBX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	816.7 KB
ID:	1020478 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IJE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	916.5 KB
ID:	1020479 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IJM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	804.8 KB
ID:	1020480 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	978.1 KB
ID:	1020481

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                    Hey team! Could you check these ones? Thanks a lot!

                    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11583[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11584[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11585[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11586[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11587[/ATTACH]
                    Slight softness issues on some, and might want to double check horizon as well, but other than that should be ok.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Hey team! What do you think of these ones? Thank you for the support!!

                      1. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AHOX.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	795.5 KB
ID:	1020514 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LOX.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	982.4 KB
ID:	1020515 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IOO.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	876.7 KB
ID:	1020516 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVF.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1020517 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JYD.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.24 MB
ID:	1020518

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                        Hey team! What do you think of these ones? Thank you for the support!!

                        1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11630[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11631[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11632[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11633[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11634[/ATTACH]
                        1. contrast
                        2. ok
                        3. horizon, soft
                        4. horizon, soft
                        5. soft

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. contrast
                          2. ok
                          3. horizon, soft
                          4. horizon, soft
                          5. soft
                          I tried to adapt the pictures according to your feedback and I added one more in the pre-screen. Thanks!

                          1. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AHOX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	735.7 KB
ID:	1020538 2.Click image for larger version

Name:	g-jzhf.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1020542 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IOO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	914.2 KB
ID:	1020539 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1020540 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JYD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1020541

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                            I tried to adapt the pictures according to your feedback and I added one more in the pre-screen. Thanks!

                            1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11656[/ATTACH] 2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]11662[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11658[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11659[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11660[/ATTACH]
                            1. borderline contrast, but probably ok
                            2. ok
                            3. borderline contrast
                            4. borderline contrast/overexposed
                            5. soft

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Hey team! I edited some new ones... Question: if the picture of the tails would get a positive pre-screen, should it be considered as an airport overview category by the categories? Off course I select the ICAO-code of the airport by 'aircraft' and then ramp. Thanks!!

                              1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EBBR Overview ok.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	877.1 KB
ID:	1020557 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	HA-LXJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1020558 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IPT.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	908.7 KB
ID:	1020559 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1020560

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                                Hey team! I edited some new ones... Question: if the picture of the tails would get a positive pre-screen, should it be considered as an airport overview category by the categories? Off course I select the ICAO-code of the airport by 'aircraft' and then ramp. Thanks!!

                                1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11677[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11678[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11679[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11680[/ATTACH]
                                1. contrast, cut off/motive
                                2. soft
                                3. borderline contrast
                                4. borderline soft

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X