Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks for the feedback and quick reply dlowwa. For no4, I thought it was acceptable if *roughly* no more than half of the gear are covered? Also, I understand vignetting for no5 due to the perimeter fence, but could you offer any advice/explanation with regards to the 'overprocessing'? Thanks, once again!
    4. 1/2 covered only if unavoidable. Looks avoidable here by waiting for a better position
    5. editing halos along the tree line

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback and quick reply dlowwa. For no4, I thought it was acceptable if *roughly* no more than half of the gear are covered? Also, I understand vignetting for no5 due to the perimeter fence, but could you offer any advice/explanation with regards to the 'overprocessing'? Thanks, once again!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Hello! How are these photos? Thank you as always for your time.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16777[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16778[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16779[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16780[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16781[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    3. borderline heat hazed/dark
    4. borderline obstruction on gear (would be rejection for me)
    5. borderline overprocessing/vignetting

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Hello! How are these photos? Thank you as always for your time.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LQD_EGPF_4997.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	459.0 KB
ID:	1028831
    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LKJ_EGPF_HIRES_5026.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	815.6 KB
ID:	1028832
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZBH_EGPF_4992.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	474.6 KB
ID:	1028833
    Click image for larger version

Name:	LZ-BHI_EGPF_4958.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	615.3 KB
ID:	1028834
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUPE_EGPF_4972.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	615.0 KB
ID:	1028835

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Great. Thanks LX-A343

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks dlowwa. That's something I need to be careful of then, as this angle tends to always have similar issues. Hopefully this shows some improvement? Thanks for your time

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16759[/ATTACH]
    Looks good enough to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks dlowwa. That's something I need to be careful of then, as this angle tends to always have similar issues. Hopefully this shows some improvement? Thanks for your time

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EBG_EGPF_V2_5085.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	424.6 KB
ID:	1028815

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How is this one? Many thanks

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16755[/ATTACH]
    Likely a rejection for soft/noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How is this one? Many thanks

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EBG_EGPF_5085.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	517.3 KB
ID:	1028812

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Decided to just go for the first image that had the tug, and can always upload the other later if the first is rejected. Thanks for the information on that one though! How are these? Many thanks as always for your time!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16728[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16729[/ATTACH]
    Some minor issues (noise/sharpening & contrast, respectively), but nothing I would reject them over.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Decided to just go for the first image that had the tug, and can always upload the other later if the first is rejected. Thanks for the information on that one though! How are these? Many thanks as always for your time!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZBE_EGPF_4721.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	690.3 KB
ID:	1028787
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TCDL_EGPF_4465.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.1 KB
ID:	1028788

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Okay, I had a feeling that might have been the issue with no2. In that case, due to the long queue wait time, could I also upload this image a few hours later and if no2 gets accepted, then I will delete no4 (below) from the queue? Thanks dlowwa!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16689[/ATTACH]
    Your choice, but if we see two similar image in the queue, they can both be rejected for similar, even if the second one hasn't been screened yet. For that reason, I'd advise against doing that.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Okay, I had a feeling that might have been the issue with no2. In that case, due to the long queue wait time, could I also upload this image a few hours later and if no2 gets accepted, then I will delete no4 (below) from the queue? Thanks dlowwa!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENE_EGPF_4684.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	457.2 KB
ID:	1028756

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these? They are all different aircraft. Thank you

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16677[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16679[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16678[/ATTACH]
    Slight heat haze on the first, but quality ok otherwise. Tugs are generally allowed if towing aircraft, but it's blocking a significant amount of the aircraft on the second so borderline for obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How are these? They are all different aircraft. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EGO_EGPF_4660.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.8 KB
ID:	1028744
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENE_EGPF_4678.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	548.2 KB
ID:	1028746
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENN_EGPF_4735.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.7 KB
ID:	1028745

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X