Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How is this one? Many thanks

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16755[/ATTACH]
    Likely a rejection for soft/noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How is this one? Many thanks

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EBG_EGPF_5085.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	517.3 KB
ID:	1028812

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Decided to just go for the first image that had the tug, and can always upload the other later if the first is rejected. Thanks for the information on that one though! How are these? Many thanks as always for your time!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16728[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16729[/ATTACH]
    Some minor issues (noise/sharpening & contrast, respectively), but nothing I would reject them over.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Decided to just go for the first image that had the tug, and can always upload the other later if the first is rejected. Thanks for the information on that one though! How are these? Many thanks as always for your time!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZBE_EGPF_4721.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	690.3 KB
ID:	1028787
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TCDL_EGPF_4465.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.1 KB
ID:	1028788

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Okay, I had a feeling that might have been the issue with no2. In that case, due to the long queue wait time, could I also upload this image a few hours later and if no2 gets accepted, then I will delete no4 (below) from the queue? Thanks dlowwa!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16689[/ATTACH]
    Your choice, but if we see two similar image in the queue, they can both be rejected for similar, even if the second one hasn't been screened yet. For that reason, I'd advise against doing that.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Okay, I had a feeling that might have been the issue with no2. In that case, due to the long queue wait time, could I also upload this image a few hours later and if no2 gets accepted, then I will delete no4 (below) from the queue? Thanks dlowwa!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENE_EGPF_4684.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	457.2 KB
ID:	1028756

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How are these? They are all different aircraft. Thank you

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16677[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16679[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16678[/ATTACH]
    Slight heat haze on the first, but quality ok otherwise. Tugs are generally allowed if towing aircraft, but it's blocking a significant amount of the aircraft on the second so borderline for obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How are these? They are all different aircraft. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EGO_EGPF_4660.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.8 KB
ID:	1028744
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENE_EGPF_4678.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	548.2 KB
ID:	1028746
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENN_EGPF_4735.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.7 KB
ID:	1028745

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks LX-A343. Does this show any acceptable improvement? Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16600[/ATTACH]
    Better, but still borderline for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks LX-A343. Does this show any acceptable improvement? Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-STBK_WSSS_V2_4024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	426.0 KB
ID:	1028672

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Noise/compression are my guess for this one, but I thought I'd just get a second opinion. Thank you very much as always.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16591[/ATTACH]
    Noise is indeed the main killer here.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Noise/compression are my guess for this one, but I thought I'd just get a second opinion. Thank you very much as always.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-STBK_WSSS_4024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	745.6 KB
ID:	1028666

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you again. A couple more...although, I'm feeling more confident with the Air France 77W than the JAL 772. Thank you!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16570[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16571[/ATTACH]
    The aircraft itself is relatively dark on all of them (TG included), but for quality they should all be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you again. A couple more...although, I'm feeling more confident with the Air France 77W than the JAL 772. Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GSQY_WSSS_3813.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	661.6 KB
ID:	1028650
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA702J_WSSS_3711.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	651.9 KB
ID:	1028651

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you dlowwa. How is this one? Thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16557[/ATTACH]
    Should be ok.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X