Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you very much!

    Regards,

    Kyle.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you! How are these shots? I tried something different, but unsure of the crops.

    Also, for no (1), is the sharpness ok; left hand side of engine 2 appears a bit softer than the rest I think?

    Thank you for your time!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28209[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28210[/ATTACH]
    Both acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Would it be possible to have feedback on the previous post please? Thank you very much!

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you! How are these shots? I tried something different, but unsure of the crops.

    Also, for no (1), is the sharpness ok; left hand side of engine 2 appears a bit softer than the rest I think?

    Thank you for your time!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TF-FIU_EGPF_MEDRES_6345.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.49 MB
ID:	1042415
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-VBIG_EGPF_MEDRES_6660.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1042416

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you for the feedback! How is this image? I'm mainly meaning in terms of contrast. Thank you for your time.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]27899[/ATTACH]
    I'd accept it.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you for the feedback! How is this image? I'm mainly meaning in terms of contrast. Thank you for your time.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EEU_EGPF_MEDRES_6193.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1042169

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    How is this image? Currently a 1024x576 pixel image; though my 1200x800 version *might* actually be better. Anyway, thank you for your time!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]27867[/ATTACH]
    i am afraid it has several issues: over sharpened, noisy, cut off and not centered

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How is this image? Currently a 1024x576 pixel image; though my 1200x800 version *might* actually be better. Anyway, thank you for your time!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-STBI_WSSS_LORES_7825.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	439.2 KB
ID:	1042139

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Ok, thank you for the reply and feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    No; there is already at least one photo in the database.
    Then not hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    No; there is already at least one photo in the database.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Hi! Would photos of crew training of the new Virgin A350-1000 be considered 'hot photos'? I assume not, but see that 'screener discretion' is part of the upload guidelines 2.5.5. Thank you.
    Is it a new reg.?

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Hi! Would photos of crew training of the new Virgin A350-1000 be considered 'hot photos'? I assume not, but see that 'screener discretion' is part of the upload guidelines 2.5.5. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Excellent. Thank you, once again! And for that speedy reply too

    Regards, Kyle

    Leave a comment:


  • 777MAN
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Hi Tony!

    I fully understand that screeners are very busy with both other screening/forums/personal life etc and had just posted here a few times as I thought my initial request was maybe overlooked by mistake. No harm done!

    Thank you very much for the feedback. Rubbish weather is a pain lol. I agree with the white balance issues; something I'll just have to keep an eye on and hopefully improve with time. With regards to the wheel issue in particular, do you think that it could be over-sharpening on these two examples (2,3)? I agree that they're definitely jagged, but the RAW files show no heat haze and compression doesn't seem *too* bad. For future reference, do images 2 and 3 differ significantly to the likes of this image also taken at the same time, with similar jagged wheels? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9364324

    Regards, Kyle
    Hi Kyie

    If 2 and 3 where mine I'd put in personal collection .
    As I said - be critical. I still do it all the time. "is it in sharp:? Yes, with a FF camera 1920 pic or 1600 upload here no probs.
    aim for this standard
    Crop sensor images well done in camera and post +https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9403826T (sorry Sandra but they are good)
    Full frame - https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9392348
    T
    Last edited by 777MAN; 2019-08-15, 21:49.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X