Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kyle McKinlay - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    How are these? They are all different aircraft. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EGO_EGPF_4660.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.8 KB
ID:	1028744
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENE_EGPF_4678.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	548.2 KB
ID:	1028746
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ENN_EGPF_4735.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.7 KB
ID:	1028745

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks LX-A343. Does this show any acceptable improvement? Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16600[/ATTACH]
    Better, but still borderline for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks LX-A343. Does this show any acceptable improvement? Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-STBK_WSSS_V2_4024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	426.0 KB
ID:	1028672

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Noise/compression are my guess for this one, but I thought I'd just get a second opinion. Thank you very much as always.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16591[/ATTACH]
    Noise is indeed the main killer here.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Noise/compression are my guess for this one, but I thought I'd just get a second opinion. Thank you very much as always.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-STBK_WSSS_4024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	745.6 KB
ID:	1028666

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you again. A couple more...although, I'm feeling more confident with the Air France 77W than the JAL 772. Thank you!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16570[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16571[/ATTACH]
    The aircraft itself is relatively dark on all of them (TG included), but for quality they should all be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you again. A couple more...although, I'm feeling more confident with the Air France 77W than the JAL 772. Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-GSQY_WSSS_3813.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	661.6 KB
ID:	1028650
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA702J_WSSS_3711.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	651.9 KB
ID:	1028651

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you dlowwa. How is this one? Thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16557[/ATTACH]
    Should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you dlowwa. How is this one? Thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-THM_WSSS_3662.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	572.5 KB
ID:	1028638

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you. Are these also okay? Thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16515[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16516[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16517[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16518[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16519[/ATTACH]
    1-2 borderline contrast
    4 borderline vignetting

    The rest ok, though mild compression on all of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you. Are these also okay? Thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SWI_WSSS_3473.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	439.7 KB
ID:	1028603
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-TAQ_WSSS_3202.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	309.8 KB
ID:	1028604
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA705J_WSSS_3368.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	275.4 KB
ID:	1028605
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JA879A_WSSS_3351.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	379.8 KB
ID:	1028606
    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-1756_WSSS_3200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	244.2 KB
ID:	1028607

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks for the previous feedback. How are these? Thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16474[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16475[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16476[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16477[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16478[/ATTACH]
    Borderline contrast/compression, but possibly ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thanks for the previous feedback. How are these? Thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SCB_WSSS_3307.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	375.4 KB
ID:	1028567
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-JSI_WSSS_3181.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	308.2 KB
ID:	1028568
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SQM_WSSS_3193.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	413.1 KB
ID:	1028569
    Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SSB_WSSS_3184.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	260.0 KB
ID:	1028570
    Click image for larger version

Name:	PK-AZJ_WSSS_3196.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	402.6 KB
ID:	1028571

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thank you both. With the exception to the dark/backlit comment, is this a little better? Thank you, once again.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16419[/ATTACH]
    No, still soft and poor contrast, and now very noisy.

    Leave a comment:


  • KyleMcKinlay
    replied
    Thank you both. With the exception to the dark/backlit comment, is this a little better? Thank you, once again.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	8319_Marina_Bay_V2_2978.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	307.8 KB
ID:	1028526

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X