Pawelm - Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Can you please check this one?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23602[/ATTACH]

thanks

Looks ok to me.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those? In terms of contrast/exposure and sharpness?


thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those? In terms of contrast/exposure and sharpness?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23874[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]23875[/ATTACH]

thanks

1. ok
2. blurry

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Can you please check this one? I'm testing new gear and I'm not quite sure about vignetting. And contrast as always


thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Can you please check this one? I'm testing new gear and I'm not quite sure about vignetting. And contrast as always
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25120[/ATTACH]

thanks

Should be acceptable on both counts.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those? I'm mostly concerned about contrast and exposure.


thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those? I'm mostly concerned about contrast and exposure.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25206[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]25207[/ATTACH]

thanks

Contrast and exposure would be ok for me.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

What's up is with bad postprocessing here? Dark halos around wheels?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7370719

Thanks

[cyx323]

Hi guys,

What's up is with bad postprocessing here? Dark halos around wheels?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7370719

Thanks

Yes, over-processing is for the dark halo around the wheels. However, the main killer here is the underexposure.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those?


thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Can you please check those?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25864[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]25865[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]25866[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]25867[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]25868[/ATTACH]

thanks

1. ok
2-4 borderline contrast
5. contrast

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Any chances for accepting this one? (please disregard the second photo)

Yeah, I know the weather conditions didn't help with that one

thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Any chances for accepting this one? (please disregard the second photo)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26151[/ATTACH]
Yeah, I know the weather conditions didn't help with that one

thanks!

Very likely a contrast rejection.

[pawelm]

Hi,

Isn't this rejection a bit harsh?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7399841

Thanks

[pdeboer]

I agree with the screeners, but if you are unhappy you can always appeal.