Originally posted by pawelm
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pawelm - Editing advice
Collapse
X
-
Hi guys,
Does anyone have an idea what this big dark round "spot" might be? As far as I can tell it is only shows on the wide end, and it's visible with or without lens correction in ACR or LR. Might it be a lens fault? Apart from that, lens works flawlessly. Or might it be some screwup in PS2021 algorythms? I've never noticed that spot until today, and I upgraded PS last week.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks
p.s. It's also visible here, in the check for dust window.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostHi guys,
Does anyone have an idea what this big dark round "spot" might be? As far as I can tell it is only shows on the wide end, and it's visible with or without lens correction in ACR or LR. Might it be a lens fault? Apart from that, lens works flawlessly. Or might it be some screwup in PS2021 algorythms? I've never noticed that spot until today, and I upgraded PS last week.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks
p.s. It's also visible here, in the check for dust window.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8562793
probably a huge dust spot or something similar?
But tbh this is nothing i would reject for - especially as it is not (or hardly) visible unequalized here.
Stay safe!Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pawelmThanks Julian. It appeared that the spot was caused by a dust lump, not on the sensor, but on the last element of the lens, the one closest to the sensor, and it was casting shadow on the sensor itself. It was the first time I came across something like that. Anyway, problem solved
I also have a question on behalf of a fellow spotter. He'd like to re-upload the following shot. It was previously rejected, among other reasons, for foreground clutter. But, in this particular situation is the obstruction a valid reason for rejection? Cirrus had a tire blowout on the runway, and what we can see is sort of rescue operation, and the men causing obstruction are part of the scene.
thanks
Comment
-
-
Hi,
Could anyone from the crew tell me what should I put as a cn here?? According to https://www.spottingmode.com/opad/fl..._chinook/1000/ it should be M.8709, but apparently it's wrong. On some Chinooks in the db cn has the dot between M and number, on others therre isn't. Is that the case?
Thanks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostHi,
Can anyone from the crew check which cn did I put in here? According to https://www.spottingmode.com/opad/fl..._chinook/1000/ it should be M.8709. Did I make a type-o?
Thanks.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8626144
Comment
-
Thanks Geri,
One more question, will the second shot be considered similar to this one? Different conditions, diffferent angle, but it's still same side of the heli.
13-08443. Boeing CH-47F Chinook. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostThanks Geri,
One more question, will the second shot be considered similar to this one? Different conditions, diffferent angle, but it's still same side of the heli.
13-08443. Boeing CH-47F Chinook. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Thanks
Comment
Comment