Pawelm - Editing advice

[pawelm]

Hi,

Is this one acceptable? I'm mostly worried about the visible lens flare on the right rotor blade over the tail.

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Is this one acceptable? I'm mostly worried about the visible lens flare on the right rotor blade over the tail.

thanks

Don't see any specific lens flare, but the strong light source on the right is washing out the contrast somewhat.

[pawelm]

Hi,

Will the trail left by ground crew member cause rejection for obstruction?

thanks

[LX-A343]

Hi,

Will the trail left by ground crew member cause rejection for obstruction?

thanks

I would accept it, others will maybe reject it. I give fair chances of being accepted.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Any chances for acceptance for one of the following shots? Yeah, weather didn't help, the contrast is far from being perfect, but on the other hand I guess it's not that bad.

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Any chances for acceptance for one of the following shots? Yeah, weather didn't help, the contrast is far from being perfect, but on the other hand I guess it's not that bad.

Thanks

1-2. similar
3. dark/contrast

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Will this one be considered as obstructed?

thanks

edit:Can you also please check if the contrast on the Metro is any good?

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Will this one be considered as obstructed?

thanks

edit:Can you also please check if the contrast on the Metro is any good?

thanks

1. unfortunately just a tiny bit obstructed
2. very borderline contrast

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Is this sort of stuff acceptable? It started opening it's "mouth" halfway through taking the photo. I think it looks kinda cool, but is it acceptable?

Thanks

Edit:

Or the second shot, with cargo hatch fully open. I'm worried by two things: frist one, is the inside of the cargo bay overexposed? Second thing, there's a spot right over the tail fin visible after equalisation, it's probably some sort of lens glare. I can't quite see it on the unequalised photo. May it cause rejection?

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Is this sort of stuff acceptable? It started opening it's "mouth" halfway through taking the photo. I think it looks kinda cool, but is it acceptable?

Thanks

Edit:

Or the second shot, with cargo hatch fully open. I'm worried by two things: frist one, is the inside of the cargo bay overexposed? Second thing, there's a spot right over the tail fin visible after equalisation, it's probably some sort of lens glare. I can't quite see it on the unequalised photo. May it cause rejection?

thanks

These would be rejected for similar.

[pawelm]

Since I'm not sure, if there are any other issues, apart from being similar, I'd like to get your feedback once again. Is this shot acceptable?

Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Since I'm not sure, if there are any other issues, apart from being similar, I'd like to get your feedback once again. Is this shot acceptable?

Thanks.

This would be a subjective decision by whoever ends up screening it. There is the minor issue of the ground crew blocking the mlg (ok for me), and of course whether the opening nose being blurry is too distracting (maybe ok for me). I couldn't say what the chances would be either way, but personally I'd probably be ok with it.

[pawelm]

Thanks. I'll give it a shot

[pawelm]

Hello,

Can you please check this one in terms of horizon? The lamp and terminal edges lean a bit to the right, but I guess it's the fault of wide angle. Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Can you please check this one in terms of horizon? The lamp and terminal edges lean a bit to the right, but I guess it's the fault of wide angle. Thanks

Horizon looks ok, but would be similar to the one you already have in the queue so no point in uploading it.