Pawelm - Editing advice

[pawelm]

Horizon looks ok, but would be similar to the one you already have in the queue so no point in uploading it.

Yes, i know. I'm gonna delete the one that's in the queue, and upload this one. Thanks

[pawelm]

Hello,

Would this one pass as a ramp shot?

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Would this one pass as a ramp shot?

thanks

Would for me.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Isn't that rejection a bit harsh? I appealed, because I thought it's about the stairs, but the cone?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9173620

quote from upload guides: Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.

If an exeption can be made for GPU, what's wrong with the cone, that obstructs not even the quarter of a wheel, which is in the shade anyway?

thanks

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Would this one be acceptable?

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Would this one be acceptable?

Thanks

Borderline for (harsh) contrast.

[pawelm]

Hi guys,

Are this two similar enuogh for rejection? And if yes, is the second photo acceptable? If it's acceptable, I'm gonna delete the one in the db, and upload second shot

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10247497

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi guys,

Are this two similar enuogh for rejection? And if yes, is the second photo acceptable? If it's acceptable, I'm gonna delete the one in the db, and upload second shot

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10247497

thanks

If different dates, not similar. Image is somewhat dark.

[pawelm]

Hi again,

Would this one pass as a spotting location?

thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi again,

Would this one pass as a spotting location?

thanks

As with any spotting location, it must be accessible to the public year-round (not a temporary or restricted location), and a description of how to get there must be included.