Originally posted by pawelm
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pawelm - Editing advice
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostHi guys,
Are this two similar enuogh for rejection? And if yes, is the second photo acceptable? If it's acceptable, I'm gonna delete the one in the db, and upload second shot
SP-RKG. Boeing 737-8AS. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Hi guys,
Are this two similar enuogh for rejection? And if yes, is the second photo acceptable? If it's acceptable, I'm gonna delete the one in the db, and upload second shot
SP-RKG. Boeing 737-8AS. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Hi guys,
Isn't that rejection a bit harsh? I appealed, because I thought it's about the stairs, but the cone?
quote from upload guides: Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.
If an exeption can be made for GPU, what's wrong with the cone, that obstructs not even the quarter of a wheel, which is in the shade anyway?
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostHello,
Can you please check this one in terms of horizon? The lamp and terminal edges lean a bit to the right, but I guess it's the fault of wide angle. Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by pawelm View PostSince I'm not sure, if there are any other issues, apart from being similar, I'd like to get your feedback once again. Is this shot acceptable?
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: