Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pawelm - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Isn't that rejection a bit harsh? I appealed, because I thought it's about the stairs, but the cone?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9173620

    quote from upload guides: Exceptions may be made if the equipment forms part of the motive of the shot, such as in use de-icing equipment, or if the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.

    If an exeption can be made for GPU, what's wrong with the cone, that obstructs not even the quarter of a wheel, which is in the shade anyway?

    thanks


    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hello,

    Would this one pass as a ramp shot?

    thanks
    Would for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hello,

    Would this one pass as a ramp shot?

    thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Horizon looks ok, but would be similar to the one you already have in the queue so no point in uploading it.
    Yes, i know. I'm gonna delete the one that's in the queue, and upload this one. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hello,

    Can you please check this one in terms of horizon? The lamp and terminal edges lean a bit to the right, but I guess it's the fault of wide angle. Thanks
    Horizon looks ok, but would be similar to the one you already have in the queue so no point in uploading it.

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hello,

    Can you please check this one in terms of horizon? The lamp and terminal edges lean a bit to the right, but I guess it's the fault of wide angle. Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Thanks. I'll give it a shot

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Since I'm not sure, if there are any other issues, apart from being similar, I'd like to get your feedback once again. Is this shot acceptable?

    Thanks.
    This would be a subjective decision by whoever ends up screening it. There is the minor issue of the ground crew blocking the mlg (ok for me), and of course whether the opening nose being blurry is too distracting (maybe ok for me). I couldn't say what the chances would be either way, but personally I'd probably be ok with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Since I'm not sure, if there are any other issues, apart from being similar, I'd like to get your feedback once again. Is this shot acceptable?

    Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi guys,

    Is this sort of stuff acceptable? It started opening it's "mouth" halfway through taking the photo. I think it looks kinda cool, but is it acceptable?

    Thanks

    Edit:

    Or the second shot, with cargo hatch fully open. I'm worried by two things: frist one, is the inside of the cargo bay overexposed? Second thing, there's a spot right over the tail fin visible after equalisation, it's probably some sort of lens glare. I can't quite see it on the unequalised photo. May it cause rejection?

    thanks
    These would be rejected for similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Is this sort of stuff acceptable? It started opening it's "mouth" halfway through taking the photo. I think it looks kinda cool, but is it acceptable?

    Thanks

    Edit:

    Or the second shot, with cargo hatch fully open. I'm worried by two things: frist one, is the inside of the cargo bay overexposed? Second thing, there's a spot right over the tail fin visible after equalisation, it's probably some sort of lens glare. I can't quite see it on the unequalised photo. May it cause rejection?

    thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi guys,

    Will this one be considered as obstructed?

    thanks

    edit:Can you also please check if the contrast on the Metro is any good?

    thanks
    1. unfortunately just a tiny bit obstructed
    2. very borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Will this one be considered as obstructed?

    thanks

    edit:Can you also please check if the contrast on the Metro is any good?

    thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi guys,

    Any chances for acceptance for one of the following shots? Yeah, weather didn't help, the contrast is far from being perfect, but on the other hand I guess it's not that bad.

    Thanks
    1-2. similar
    3. dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • pawelm
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Any chances for acceptance for one of the following shots? Yeah, weather didn't help, the contrast is far from being perfect, but on the other hand I guess it's not that bad.

    Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X