wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

1. tail slightly soft, but otherwise ok
2-4 ok for me
5. borderline soft, but passable for me

Thanks Dana for your words.

Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
Here are two examples.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8858232

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8864994

Best regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana for your words.

Received this reject for horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423540

Appealed on it, because there is a pole left to the main gear in the centre of the photo. Compared to that one, it's absolutely level.
Got a reject at the appeal, In the comment, I was told, that the vericals on the tiled wall are leaning to the right.
This doesn't fit well to well to me, as the tiled wall is running away to left in this angle and so not a good reference for leveling photos here.
Got also photos accepted from the same spot where the verticals on this wall are also not level.
Here are two examples.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8858232

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8864994

Best regards,

Wilko

Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.

[wkd001]

Can't really help you on this one, image level is acceptable for me.

Thank you for your words Dana,

Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your words Dana,

Is there something to do about this?. Just to re-upload and send a message to the screening team for example?
I guess that will make a mistake, as I read the team doesn't really like that.
Or is there a better solution. Won't re-edit as I expect another horizon reject in that case.
Can't appeal again ofcourse, but this really doesn't fit well to me.
For example. This one is my mistake. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6417417.
As I used a pole visible behind the landing gear for leveling .I did that wrong, costing me a reject.
On the CZ 777F, the pole I used is absolutely level, even verified with the horizon tool at the website.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.

[wkd001]

Not much. Just give it a little rotation and put it back in the queue.

My mistake Dana, my apologies.
A re-edit of the China Eastern A330 is already in te queue.
Still dubbing what to do with the CZ777F....

[dlowwa]

My mistake Dana, my apologies.
A re-edit of the China Eastern A330 is already in te queue.
Still dubbing what to do with the CZ777F....

I know, that's what I was referring to.

[wkd001]

I know, that's what I was referring to.

OK Dana thank you. I want to close this case also....

After another check and still doubts I gave the CZ 777F a try...Gave a slight touch of CCW.



And four more....






Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

OK Dana thank you. I want to close this case also....

After another check and still doubts I gave the CZ 777F a try...Gave a slight touch of CCW.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14372[/ATTACH]

And four more....

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14373[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14374[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14375[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14376[/ATTACH]

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Quality/level looks fine on all of them to me. Were you using a polarizer on #2-3? The sky darkens noticeably towards the top of the frame, especially on the -47.

[wkd001]

Quality/level looks fine on all of them to me. Were you using a polarizer on #2-3? The sky darkens noticeably towards the top of the frame, especially on the -47.

Apologies for the late reply. Very busy with other things also, but thank you for your words Dana.
1-3 Were all also taken with a physical filter on my camera. From the same session as some photos posted earlier in this thread.
It did work on most of the photos but to me not on the 747's. The KLM 747 looks indeed overprocessed although it is not.
Putted the Delta already in the queue, but afraid the 747 won't make it. Any advice?
I also reported the use of the filter with the uploads of this session to the screeners like you asked earlier.

Another question.

Received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6433985

Made a new edit.


Not sure about it. I do have a second one.


I want to know which one has the best chance.

And two others.




Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Apologies for the late reply. Very busy with other things also, but thank you for your words Dana.
1-3 Were all also taken with a physical filter on my camera. From the same session as some photos posted earlier in this thread.
It did work on most of the photos but to me not on the 747's. The KLM 747 looks indeed overprocessed although it is not.
Putted the Delta already in the queue, but afraid the 747 won't make it. Any advice?
I also reported the use of the filter with the uploads of this session to the screeners like you asked earlier.

Another question.

Received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6433985

Made a new edit.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14510[/ATTACH]

Not sure about it. I do have a second one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14511[/ATTACH]

I want to know which one has the best chance.

And two others.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14512[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14513[/ATTACH]

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

All would be acceptable for me.

[wkd001]

All would be acceptable for me.

Thank you again for your time Dana.
2,3 and 4 are in the queue...



Does this need nightshot for uploading??? Taken late at the day, but not at the end...
I think there are more issues, but I can't really point them...

And two more for advice...



Best Regards,
Wilko

[LX-A343]

Thank you again for your time Dana.
2,3 and 4 are in the queue...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14598[/ATTACH]

Does this need nightshot for uploading??? Taken late at the day, but not at the end...
I think there are more issues, but I can't really point them...

And two more for advice...
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14599[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14600[/ATTACH]

Best Regards,
Wilko

1: slightly soft and leaning to the left. If you correct this and upload it, I suggest you select Night Shot and leave a remark to the screener, that you took it in the late afternoon
2, 3: OK for me

[wkd001]

1: slightly soft and leaning to the left. If you correct this and upload it, I suggest you select Night Shot and leave a remark to the screener, that you took it in the late afternoon
2, 3: OK for me

Thank you for your answers Gerardo.
Corrected the Easyjet and will upload it with the comment following your advice.

Five for advice.



Contrast shall definitely be an issue. Want to know if it's maybe borderline.
Do also have doubts about centering and horizon.



should not be similar compared to the one I have in the DB.

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your answers Gerardo.
Corrected the Easyjet and will upload it with the comment following your advice.

Five for advice.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14654[/ATTACH]

Contrast shall definitely be an issue. Want to know if it's maybe borderline.
Do also have doubts about centering and horizon.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14655[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14656[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14657[/ATTACH] should not be similar compared to the one I have in the DB.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14658[/ATTACH]

1. dark, contrast. not borderline, will be rejected.
2. borderline soft
3-4 borderline contrast
5. soft

[wkd001]

1. dark, contrast. not borderline, will be rejected.
2. borderline soft
3-4 borderline contrast
5. soft

Thanks Dana,

Will try nr 3 and maybe nr.2
1,4 and 5 will remain personal for various reasons.

Three new ones.





Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko