wkd001- Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana,

Will try nr 3 and maybe nr.2
1,4 and 5 will remain personal for various reasons.

Three new ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14738[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14739[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14740[/ATTACH]

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

Last one maybe a bit dark; otherwise don't see any major issues.

[wkd001]

Last one maybe a bit dark; otherwise don't see any major issues.

Thank you again Dana.

1 and 2 are in the queue.
Will see what to do with nr.3 as I had time to go out to airport yesterday for new photos.
Unfortunately sometimes thin cloud layers, so contrast shall be an issue to some of them
of course there can be other problems also.

Want to offer five for pre-screen







Note to nr 2 and 3. Different aircraft from the same company.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thank you again Dana.

1 and 2 are in the queue.
Will see what to do with nr.3 as I had time to go out to airport yesterday for new photos.
Unfortunately sometimes thin cloud layers, so contrast shall be an issue to some of them
of course there can be other problems also.

Want to offer five for pre-screen

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14928[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14929[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14930[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14931[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14932[/ATTACH]

Note to nr 2 and 3. Different aircraft from the same company.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

1. borderline soft
2. soft, contrast
3. soft, contrast, color, horizon
4. dark, soft
5. borderline contrast

[wkd001]

1. borderline soft
2. soft, contrast
3. soft, contrast, color, horizon
4. dark, soft
5. borderline contrast

Dana thank you for your time.
Hopefully questions will fall aside the 24hrs rule

Will try reworked versions for 1 and 5. 4 remains personal. Adding more exposure destroys the histogram...

Questions for nr 2. Will I have to add more or get rid of contrast. Shot is taken with a long focal stretch, so could it be blurry?
Questions for nr 3. Can't point the color and the contrast (too much?) in this one???
Maybe both are blurred as I can find jaggies???
All shot were taken on a warm day also including heathaze, so that could also be an issue.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Dana thank you for your time.
Hopefully questions will fall aside the 24hrs rule

Will try reworked versions for 1 and 5. 4 remains personal. Adding more exposure destroys the histogram...

Questions for nr 2. Will I have to add more or get rid of contrast. Shot is taken with a long focal stretch, so could it be blurry?
Questions for nr 3. Can't point the color and the contrast (too much?) in this one???
Maybe both are blurred as I can find jaggies???
All shot were taken on a warm day also including heathaze, so that could also be an issue.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Contrast is low on both, related to the hazy skies. Better edits might help, but can't say for certain. Not blurry, just quite soft, which makes sense if taken at the long end of the focal range.

[wkd001]

Contrast is low on both, related to the hazy skies. Better edits might help, but can't say for certain. Not blurry, just quite soft, which makes sense if taken at the long end of the focal range.

Thank you for your words Dana.
Both will remain personal. Tried a re-edit on the second one, but suffered so many editing halos, that I won't spend any energy on it anymore.

Final three for pre-screen this session.





Two with defenitely contrast issues and maybe more.

Hopeful to receive better conditions the upcoming weekend in Zurich

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your words Dana.
Both will remain personal. Tried a re-edit on the second one, but suffered so many editing halos, that I won't spend any energy on it anymore.

Final three for pre-screen this session.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]14985[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14986[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14987[/ATTACH]

Two with defenitely contrast issues and maybe more.

Hopeful to receive better conditions the upcoming weekend in Zurich

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

1. ok
2. borderline soft
3. soft

[wkd001]

1. ok
2. borderline soft
3. soft

Thank you Dana.
Will try my luck with 1 and 2.

Five new ones for check.







Got a little dazed by all the verticals by 2-4.... Extra check would be appreciated.
Of course feel free to mention other things.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[LX-A343]

Thank you Dana.
Will try my luck with 1 and 2.

Five new ones for check.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15116[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15117[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15118[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15119[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15120[/ATTACH]

Got a little dazed by all the verticals by 2-4.... Extra check would be appreciated.
Of course feel free to mention other things.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

1: OK
2: something is bugging me, not sure, if just a bit soft or a bit heat haze
3: OK
4: OK
5: backlit

[wkd001]

1: OK
2: something is bugging me, not sure, if just a bit soft or a bit heat haze
3: OK
4: OK
5: backlit

Thank you Gerardo.

I will upload 1,3 and 4.
Fascinating answer for the Aeroflot Boeing 737-800
Gave it a touch more sharpening. There is heathaze above the aircraft, but it shouldn't affect the aircraft.
Will include it again. If still strange, I will try another one of this aircraft.



And four new ones.






Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko.

[LX-A343]

Thank you Gerardo.

I will upload 1,3 and 4.
Fascinating answer for the Aeroflot Boeing 737-800
Gave it a touch more sharpening. There is heathaze above the aircraft, but it shouldn't affect the aircraft.
Will include it again. If still strange, I will try another one of this aircraft.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15164[/ATTACH]

And four new ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15165[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15166[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15167[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15168[/ATTACH]

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko.

1: still looking heat hazed: windows, wing for example
2: OK
3: A tad too high in the frame
4/5: OK

[wkd001]

1: still looking heat hazed: windows, wing for example
2: OK
3: A tad too high in the frame
4/5: OK

Thank you again Gerardo,

Aeroflot won't be seen here. Found the problems you mentioned and the other one I have is even worse.
Would like to ask your opinion about a re-edit of the Embraer Lineage 1000. Pulled a little down in frame.



And four new ones.






Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko.

[dlowwa]

Thank you again Gerardo,

Aeroflot won't be seen here. Found the problems you mentioned and the other one I have is even worse.
Would like to ask your opinion about a re-edit of the Embraer Lineage 1000. Pulled a little down in frame.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15203[/ATTACH]

And four new ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15204[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15205[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15206[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15207[/ATTACH]

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko.

1. ok
2-3, 5 borderline soft
4. backlit/contrast

[wkd001]

1. ok
2-3, 5 borderline soft
4. backlit/contrast

Dana, thank you again for your time.
Nr.1 is in the queue and I will probably upload nr 3 and 5 after some additional sharpening.
Nr.4 shall remain personal.
Nr.2 gives me doubts due to the long focal length of this shot even after additional sharpening as well. .

So here it is again.

.

Three new ones for advice.





As final a special one.



As I do have this one in the database https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8568667. It could be considered similar, due to the almost identical angle, but I hope the backdrop (clouds) is different enough. Of course this one was taken more than a year later.
I'm not sure ,so that's the reason I want to ask.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[wkd001]

Dana, thank you again for your time.
Nr.1 is in the queue and I will probably upload nr 3 and 5 after some additional sharpening.
Nr.4 shall remain personal.
Nr.2 gives me doubts due to the long focal length of this shot even after additional sharpening as well. .

So here it is again.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15262[/ATTACH].

Three new ones for advice.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15263[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15264[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15265[/ATTACH]

As final a special one.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15266[/ATTACH]

As I do have this one in the database https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8568667. It could be considered similar, due to the almost identical angle, but I hope the backdrop (clouds) is different enough. Of course this one was taken more than a year later.
I'm not sure ,so that's the reason I want to ask.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Apparently missed his request? Changed a couple of words that could be intended as not friendly. That was unintended though