Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1113541]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Thanks Dana.

    I've tried to rework the second of the previous post and especially on terms of dark and contrast.
    1. bit better. would be ok for me.
    2. indeed soft

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1113338]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    1. borderline cut off
    2. borderline cut off/dark/contrast
    3. contrast
    Thanks Dana.

    I've tried to rework the second of the previous post and especially on terms of dark and contrast.
    Again I would like a prescreen on it as I'm still unsure about it, but also understand that the condtions (dark foreground and lighter background and the sun almost on the back of the aircraft) aren't in my favor. Lifted up the shadows a bit and added some blacks. Also addded a tiny touch of exposure,
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0379-2-2.JPG
Views:	88
Size:	542.1 KB
ID:	1113542

    I also would like a prescreen on this one.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0369.JPG
Views:	73
Size:	334.2 KB
ID:	1113543 Very unsure about especially sharpening here.

    Thanks in advance and regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1113327]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    After some time no aviation for me, I would lik a prescreen on three images I'm very unsure about.
    1. borderline cut off
    2. borderline cut off/dark/contrast
    3. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1111193]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Anyway, I would still like a pre screen on the AA,

    Also I would like a prescreen on this image.

    /QUOTE]

    1. borderline soft
    2. soft (especially tail area)
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    Improved versions of both got accepted at the end.

    After some time no aviation for me, I would lik a prescreen on three images I'm very unsure about.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0374-2.JPG
Views:	91
Size:	361.5 KB
ID:	1113328 Worries about softness,contrast and crop at least.The entire aircraft was not included on the RAW-file (was around 75% of it).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0379-2.JPG
Views:	79
Size:	527.7 KB
ID:	1113329 Biggest worries here are contrast, exposure and crop. Again not the entire aircraft included in the RAW-file (Left wing was partially cut-off in this case).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0449.JPG
Views:	76
Size:	311.6 KB
ID:	1113330 Biggest worries her are sharpness and (of course) contrast. Also curious if the glare is not too disturbing.

    If there is anything I've missed, I would like to know as well.

    Thanks in advance and Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1111188]Anyway, I would still like a pre screen on the AA,

    Also I would like a prescreen on this image.

    /QUOTE]

    1. borderline soft
    2. soft (especially tail area)

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. still somewhat soft & dark, but centering looks fine to me.
    2-3. not uploadable
    Thanks Dana,

    I've applied extra sharpening and could add extra exposure to the LAN Cargo and queued that final version.

    Weird of the IB and the AA, as my PC warns me normally if the files are too huge for uploading, Maybe that only works for 16-9 images

    Anyway, I would still like a pre screen on the AA, the IB I abandon.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9850-2.JPG
Views:	86
Size:	435.6 KB
ID:	1111189 Still sharpening, contrast and exposure are my biggest potential issues and maybe the weird angle, as the aircraft turned quickly to the left.

    Also I would like a prescreen on this image.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9557-2.JPG
Views:	73
Size:	343.0 KB
ID:	1111190 Biggest potential issues for me here are contrast/ shadows and maybe color.

    Maybe also other things I could have missed on both.

    Thanks in advance.

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked the LAN Cargo. So this time ,I would like a prescreen on it.

    Crop should be better now, but at least an eye on contrast and exposure would be appreciated, but to me. I can't push the contrast any further.

    I also would like a prescreen on two other images
    1. still somewhat soft & dark, but centering looks fine to me.
    2-3. not uploadable

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

    Harsh contrast and soft for me.



    Not uploadable.
    Thanks,

    Also crew response would be appreciated here...

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked the LAN Cargo. So this time ,I would like a prescreen on it.
    Harsh contrast and soft for me.

    Both surprised me with quick turns which are making the angles maybe unattractive
    I'm not sure on at least sharpness on them and maybe other stuff I've missed.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Regards
    Not uploadable.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Would be ok for me.



    Looks a little unbalanced towards the left side.
    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked the LAN Cargo. So this time ,I would like a prescreen on it.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9966-2-2.JPG
Views:	99
Size:	421.8 KB
ID:	1111091 Crop should be better now, but at least an eye on contrast and exposure would be appreciated, but to me. I can't push the contrast any further.

    I also would like a prescreen on two other images

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9755-2-2.JPG
Views:	88
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1111092Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9850.JPG
Views:	86
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1111093 Both surprised me with quick turns which are making the angles maybe unattractive
    I'm not sure on at least sharpness on them and maybe other stuff I've missed.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I would like to offer the Kenya again for prescreening
    Click image for larger version Name:	DSC_9789-2.JPG Views:	0 Size:	333.1 KB ID:	1110803 Even shot at 1/800 and f/10, I think the crop and focal length of this shot (290mm) kills this shot. Could you (or someone else of course) check again on sharpness and maybe other stuff I could have missed (personally don't think so, but never sure of course). If it fails, so be it.
    Would be ok for me.

    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    At second I had this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8932096 which I totally don't understand.
    Checked the centering with the tool and it should be good.
    Maybe the crop is the killer, (entire aircraft was not included in the original file) but that's not stated in the reject, otherwise part of aircraft cut off?
    Don't also see the issue with the contrast here.
    Any guidance or futher explanation would be appreciated .
    Looks a little unbalanced towards the left side.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A bit dark/soft, but otherwise ok for me.



    Nose/tail/wingtip soft.. basically the farther away from the center of the frame, the more soft it gets.
    Thanks Dana,

    Added some sharpness and exposure to the Emirates and tried my luck with it.

    I would like to offer the Kenya again for prescreening
    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_9789-2.JPG Views:	0 Size:	333.1 KB ID:	1110803 Even shot at 1/800 and f/10, I think the crop and focal length of this shot (290mm) kills this shot. Could you (or someone else of course) check again on sharpness and maybe other stuff I could have missed (personally don't think so, but never sure of course). If it fails, so be it.

    At second I had this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8932096 which I totally don't understand.
    Checked the centering with the tool and it should be good.
    Maybe the crop is the killer, (entire aircraft was not included in the original file) but that's not stated in the reject, otherwise part of aircraft cut off?
    Don't also see the issue with the contrast here.
    Any guidance or futher explanation would be appreciated .

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks a lot Dana,

    I've queued an (in my eyes) improved version of the China Cargo

    I've also reworked the EK 777F, but as I'm still unsure about its quality I would again like a prescreen on it.
    A bit dark/soft, but otherwise ok for me.

    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I also have a second question.
    I've had this reject today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8913570
    Sorry for maybe annoying here, but i still find it difficult to manage sharpness/too soft sometimes.
    On this reject I don't really see what is exactly too soft as I'm seeing almost all the hard lines.
    Maybe the LH-side on the aircraft is the issue.
    Any guidance would be appreciated.
    Nose/tail/wingtip soft.. basically the farther away from the center of the frame, the more soft it gets.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast is fine, color looks a touch oversaturated, and aircraft a bit soft. Otherwise ok for me.
    Thanks a lot Dana,

    I've queued an (in my eyes) improved version of the China Cargo

    I've also reworked the EK 777F, but as I'm still unsure about its quality I would again like a prescreen on it.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9913-2-2.JPG
Views:	115
Size:	426.9 KB
ID:	1110274 At least softness is a big potential issue on this one. Especially upper part of the aircraft.

    I also have a second question.
    I've had this reject today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8913570
    Sorry for maybe annoying here, but i still find it difficult to manage sharpness/too soft sometimes.
    On this reject I don't really see what is exactly too soft as I'm seeing almost all the hard lines.
    Maybe the LH-side on the aircraft is the issue.
    Any guidance would be appreciated.

    Thanks in Advance and regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Now i would like a prescreen for these two photos.
    Contrast is fine, color looks a touch oversaturated, and aircraft a bit soft. Otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X