wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

1. centering ok, borderline soft
2. borderline soft/color
3. ok

Dana, thank you for your time

Uploaded The Qatar and after some extra work the TUI.

Some nasty ''contrasty'' ones for advice.





Of course, if there is more, I want to know as well.

Thanks in advance

Best Regards.

Wilko

[LX-A343]

Dana, thank you for your time

Uploaded The Qatar and after some extra work the TUI.

Some nasty ''contrasty'' ones for advice.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]15922[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15923[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15924[/ATTACH]

Of course, if there is more, I want to know as well.

Thanks in advance

Best Regards.

Wilko

1: OK
2, 3: borderline soft/overexposed.

[wkd001]

1: OK
2, 3: borderline soft/overexposed.

Thank you Gerardo.

After correcting 2 and 3 I will try number 3.

Want to show nr 2 again as I think it's maybe too dark now and also color/contrast could become an issue



Got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6570905

Compared to the 2nd attempt ( after reading the appeal message from the screener to that one , I had to agree it was too soft indeed)I did a fair amount of sharpening again.
To me it still seems ok. (More sharpening would result in jaggies in my opinion.)
The original is not blurred and I had no message with my reject email.
Could it be worth an appeal or am I missing something deerly.

Hoping you could help me out.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

[LX-A343]

Thank you Gerardo.

After correcting 2 and 3 I will try number 3.

Want to show nr 2 again as I think it's maybe too dark now and also color/contrast could become an issue

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16010[/ATTACH]

Got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6570905

Compared to the 2nd attempt ( after reading the appeal message from the screener to that one , I had to agree it was too soft indeed)I did a fair amount of sharpening again.
To me it still seems ok. (More sharpening would result in jaggies in my opinion.)
The original is not blurred and I had no message with my reject email.
Could it be worth an appeal or am I missing something deerly.

Hoping you could help me out.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

The LX A333 looks OK in my opinion ... and it reminds me on how much I hate those poles in ZRH!!!

The AC B787 is borderline IMO. Try an appeal, chances are fair. If it fails, try to start from scratch and apply a bit more sharpening, maybe only Unsharp Mask or Selective Sharpening.

[wkd001]

The LX A333 looks OK in my opinion ... and it reminds me on how much I hate those poles in ZRH!!!

The AC B787 is borderline IMO. Try an appeal, chances are fair. If it fails, try to start from scratch and apply a bit more sharpening, maybe only Unsharp Mask or Selective Sharpening.

Thank you again. Agree with you about the poles. had to make the best of it as I had no car during my visit.
I have uploaded the LX A333 and appealed on the AC 787. The appeal got accepted.

Five new ones for pre-screen.







They were all taken (early) evening . but I think only the last three should be night shots, but correct me if i'm wrong.
Feel ofcourse free to mention other points.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thank you again. Agree with you about the poles. had to make the best of it as I had no car during my visit.
I have uploaded the LX A333 and appealed on the AC 787. The appeal got accepted.

Five new ones for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16087[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16088[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16089[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16090[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16091[/ATTACH]

They were all taken (early) evening . but I think only the last three should be night shots, but correct me if i'm wrong.
Feel ofcourse free to mention other points.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

All are soft, especially towards the tail; last one borderline for contrast.

[wkd001]

All are soft, especially towards the tail; last one borderline for contrast.

Thanks Dana,

Due to your words, I made the decision not to go on with any of those.

I made three edits from different shots of 2,3 and 4. Here they are.





Did serious more sharpening on those, but still have a lot of doubts.

And two other new ones.




Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana,

Due to your words, I made the decision not to go on with any of those.

I made three edits from different shots of 2,3 and 4. Here they are.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16180[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16181[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16182[/ATTACH]

Did serious more sharpening on those, but still have a lot of doubts.

And two other new ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16183[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16184[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

1-4 borderline soft/contrast
5 contrast

[wkd001]

1-4 borderline soft/contrast
5 contrast

Thank You Dana, will try some of them (Not 5).
However, I bought myself a new body and this caused me to change from editing tools..
Went also to LHR this weekend.
Try to get myself into the new things.

Started editing today and I would like to receive advice on these three.





Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thank You Dana, will try some of them (Not 5).
However, I bought myself a new body and this caused me to change from editing tools..
Went also to LHR this weekend.
Try to get myself into the new things.

Started editing today and I would like to receive advice on these three.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16365[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16366[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16367[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

All slightly dark but otherwise ok.

[wkd001]

All slightly dark but otherwise ok.

Thank you so much Dana,

Gave all a slight lift in exposure and will try definetely the Etihad and the Air New Zealand.

Five new ones for advice.







Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Five new ones for advice.

Should be fine.

[wkd001]

Should be fine.

Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

Five new ones for advice.







Thank you in Advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

[vcruvinel]

Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

Five new ones for advice.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16497[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16498[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16499[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16500[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16501[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

Wilko,

IMHO #1, #2 and #4 looks ok. number #4 appear to be backlit (better wait more comments) and #5 is high in frame.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[dlowwa]

Awesome Dana, thank you, I will give them a try.

Five new ones for advice.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16497[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16498[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16499[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16500[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16501[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

1 & 3 borderline for contrast, but otherwise they should be ok.

Wilko,

number #4 appear to be backlit (better wait more comments)

Perhaps you meant #3? #4 is not even close to being backlit.

and #5 is high in frame.

Once again, centering is not an issue.