Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1 & 3 borderline for contrast, but otherwise they should be ok.



    Perhaps you meant #3? #4 is not even close to being backlit.



    Once again, centering is not an issue.
    Sorry, Dana. It`s #3 not #4. (I typed wrong #4). Thanks for the correction I will pay more attention.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Comment


    • Thank you Dana and Vinicius,

      I will try them all, also accepting the risks of 1 and 3

      Five new ones for advice.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0094.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	526.8 KB
ID:	1028677 Whites, exposure?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0648.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	438.6 KB
ID:	1028678 Contrast?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1241.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	655.3 KB
ID:	1028679 Sharpness and maybe contrast
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1314.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	612.8 KB
ID:	1028680 Nasty contrast, maybe borderline?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1320.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	595.8 KB
ID:	1028681 Also contrast, but I think it has a bigger chance as #4

      Entered some ideas myself, but feel free to mention other things as well if necessary.

      Thank you in Advance.

      Best Regards,

      Wilko

      Comment


      • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
        Thank you Dana and Vinicius,

        I will try them all, also accepting the risks of 1 and 3

        Five new ones for advice.

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16605[/ATTACH] Whites, exposure?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16606[/ATTACH] Contrast?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16607[/ATTACH] Sharpness and maybe contrast
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16608[/ATTACH] Nasty contrast, maybe borderline?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16609[/ATTACH] Also contrast, but I think it has a bigger chance as #4

        Entered some ideas myself, but feel free to mention other things as well if necessary.

        Thank you in Advance.

        Best Regards,

        Wilko
        Some minor contrast issues yes, but they would all be acceptable for me.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Some minor contrast issues yes, but they would all be acceptable for me.
          Thank you again Dana,

          Will try them all, where possible with some increased contrast.

          Only a small question about #4 , The Small Planet A320, Does it need Special Scheme as it's a kind of Hybrid Livery.
          Can't figure it out myself to be honest.

          And four new ones.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1301.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	567.1 KB
ID:	1028704 Contrast
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1308.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	599.4 KB
ID:	1028705 Contrast (I think can't make it...)
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0966.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	621.4 KB
ID:	1028706 Exposure, sharpness,
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0072.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	562.8 KB
ID:	1028707 Contrast,

          If there are any others things, let me know,

          Thank you in Advance.

          Best Regards,

          Wilko

          Comment


          • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
            Thank you again Dana,

            Will try them all, where possible with some increased contrast.

            Only a small question about #4 , The Small Planet A320, Does it need Special Scheme as it's a kind of Hybrid Livery.
            Can't figure it out myself to be honest.

            And four new ones.

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16635[/ATTACH] Contrast
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16636[/ATTACH] Contrast (I think can't make it...)
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16637[/ATTACH] Exposure, sharpness,
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16638[/ATTACH] Contrast,

            If there are any others things, let me know,

            Thank you in Advance.

            Best Regards,

            Wilko
            all acceptable to me, 4 is borderline contrast.
            If you look up the history of owner of the small planet, you will find it was owned by Afriqiyah Airways previously. The tail still wears its livery, so hybrid.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
              all acceptable to me, 4 is borderline contrast.
              If you look up the history of owner of the small planet, you will find it was owned by Afriqiyah Airways previously. The tail still wears its livery, so hybrid.
              Thank you Pamela,

              Will try them all (Apparently except the Royal Jordanian 78

              Received this Reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6637751
              As it was already as borderline pre screened, I won't discuss it.
              Made an edit of a shot seconds earlier, but do have a lot of doubts about that one as well
              It's this one.
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0674.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	735.9 KB
ID:	1028805

              Plus four others for prescreen.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0074.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	651.4 KB
ID:	1028806
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0444-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	402.4 KB
ID:	1028807
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0668.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	639.2 KB
ID:	1028808
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1249.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	528.9 KB
ID:	1028809

              Thank you in Advance.

              Best Regards,

              Wilko

              Comment


              • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                Thank you Pamela,

                Will try them all (Apparently except the Royal Jordanian 78

                Received this Reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6637751
                As it was already as borderline pre screened, I won't discuss it.
                Made an edit of a shot seconds earlier, but do have a lot of doubts about that one as well
                It's this one.
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16748[/ATTACH]

                Plus four others for prescreen.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16749[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16750[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16751[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16752[/ATTACH]

                Thank you in Advance.

                Best Regards,

                Wilko
                1, 2, 4 borderline dark/contrast
                3 ok
                5 soft/blurry, dark

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  1, 2, 4 borderline dark/contrast
                  3 ok
                  5 soft/blurry, dark
                  Thanks Dana,

                  Will apparently try 2 and 3 amd maybe 4 after extra work.

                  Received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6641000. Had apparently included not enough contrast as also the screeners message said that.
                  Gave it some extra sharpening as well, but by far not sure if the contrast can be properly fixed as it was a very hazy day with some sunrays also on this one.
                  Fighting with the blacks and the shadows on this one. Can't figure it out properly as also the histogram is stretched to the end.
                  Gave it this try, but by far not sure.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1320.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	711.8 KB
ID:	1028822

                  Also two other for prescreen.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0729.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	557.2 KB
ID:	1028823
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1288-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	535.8 KB
ID:	1028824

                  Thank you in Advance.

                  Best Regards,

                  Wilko

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                    Thanks Dana,

                    Will apparently try 2 and 3 amd maybe 4 after extra work.

                    Received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6641000. Had apparently included not enough contrast as also the screeners message said that.
                    Gave it some extra sharpening as well, but by far not sure if the contrast can be properly fixed as it was a very hazy day with some sunrays also on this one.
                    Fighting with the blacks and the shadows on this one. Can't figure it out properly as also the histogram is stretched to the end.
                    Gave it this try, but by far not sure.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16767[/ATTACH]

                    Also two other for prescreen.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16768[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16769[/ATTACH]

                    Thank you in Advance.

                    Best Regards,

                    Wilko
                    1. ok for me
                    2. borderline dark
                    3. borderline soft

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      1. ok for me
                      2. borderline dark
                      3. borderline soft
                      Thank you again Dana,

                      I will try them all and do corrections where necessary.

                      Four new ones.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1354.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	630.7 KB
ID:	1028850 Contrast, Color???
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1389.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	491.9 KB
ID:	1028851Underneath the belly is a KLM aircraft visible while taking off from another runway.
                      It's only completely blurred because it was very warm.What's the right way to act with things like this?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6036.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	699.0 KB
ID:	1028852 Biggest question: Too much obstruction?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1403-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	529.8 KB
ID:	1028853 Heat haze?
                      For the attachment no special scheme I expect? the sticker is on all the aircraft although it's pretty big.

                      Thank you in advance.

                      Best Regards,

                      Wilko
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                        Thank you again Dana,

                        I will try them all and do corrections where necessary.

                        Four new ones.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16805[/ATTACH] Contrast, Color???
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16806[/ATTACH]Underneath the belly is a KLM aircraft visible while taking off from another runway.
                        It's only completely blurred because it was very warm.What's the right way to act with things like this?
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16807[/ATTACH] Biggest question: Too much obstruction?
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16808[/ATTACH] Heat haze?
                        For the attachment no special scheme I expect? the sticker is on all the aircraft although it's pretty big.

                        Thank you in advance.

                        Best Regards,

                        Wilko
                        1. borderline contrast
                        2. ok. leave a note about the blurred aircraft if you want
                        3. ok for me
                        4. no heat haze
                        5. no special

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. borderline contrast
                          2. ok. leave a note about the blurred aircraft if you want
                          3. ok for me
                          4. no heat haze
                          5. no special
                          Thank you Dana,

                          Will act as you requested with the TUI 788. Air Europa remains personal (Too much doubt)

                          Five new ones for advice

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0583.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	648.6 KB
ID:	1028935
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0653.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	622.4 KB
ID:	1028936
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1408.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	583.0 KB
ID:	1028937
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1423.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	557.4 KB
ID:	1028938
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1487.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	796.1 KB
ID:	1028939

                          Thank you in advance.

                          Best Regards,

                          Wilko

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                            Thank you Dana,

                            Will act as you requested with the TUI 788. Air Europa remains personal (Too much doubt)

                            Five new ones for advice

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16895[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16896[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16897[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16898[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]16899[/ATTACH]

                            Thank you in advance.

                            Best Regards,

                            Wilko
                            1-2 borderline contrast
                            3-5 ok

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                              1-2 borderline contrast
                              3-5 ok
                              Thank you again Dana,

                              Will try 2-5 and maybe 1.

                              Received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6651032.
                              Couldn't repair the big dust spot properly, (deerly missed it also ) so decided to edit a photo a split second later,
                              It's this one.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0545.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	512.5 KB
ID:	1028990

                              Plus four new ones...

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1450.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	786.7 KB
ID:	1028991
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1471.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	518.3 KB
ID:	1028992
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1557.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	407.0 KB
ID:	1028993
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1571.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	722.3 KB
ID:	1028994

                              Thank you in Advance.

                              Best Regards,

                              Wilko

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                                Thank you again Dana,

                                Will try 2-5 and maybe 1.

                                Received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6651032.
                                Couldn't repair the big dust spot properly, (deerly missed it also ) so decided to edit a photo a split second later,
                                It's this one.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16955[/ATTACH]

                                Plus four new ones...

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16956[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16957[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16958[/ATTACH]
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16959[/ATTACH]

                                Thank you in Advance.

                                Best Regards,

                                Wilko
                                Look ok to me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X