wkd001- Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Thank you again Dana!

Some new ones...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17932[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17933[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17934[/ATTACH] want to use with the BA A319, or should I do something else?

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards.

Wilko

First one is a bit bright; otherwise they should be ok. BA is fine on third.

[wkd001]

First one is a bit bright; otherwise they should be ok. BA is fine on third.

thanks a lot Dana

How the exposure of the IB A319 now?



And four others with doubts






Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

thanks a lot Dana

How the exposure of the IB A319 now?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18058[/ATTACH]

And four others with doubts

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18059[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18060[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18061[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18062[/ATTACH]

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Quality looks fine on all of these.

[wkd001]

Quality looks fine on all of these.

Thank you again Dana.
I will try them all.

However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[LX-A343]

Thank you again Dana.
I will try them all.

However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Cropping is OK for me.

Try to reduce exposure a bit and add more contrast. That will certainly correct exposure, maybe even softness. If not, add some unsharp masking, just a tad and it should be acceptable.

[wkd001]

Cropping is OK for me.

Try to reduce exposure a bit and add more contrast. That will certainly correct exposure, maybe even softness. If not, add some unsharp masking, just a tad and it should be acceptable.

Thanks Gerardo,
However, after struggling too much with shadows exposure, blacks and contrast. i decided to let go.
Can't get a result what it satisfying me.

So five other ones, which defenitely need pre-screen.







Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thanks Gerardo,
However, after struggling too much with shadows exposure, blacks and contrast. i decided to let go.
Can't get a result what it satisfying me.

So five other ones, which defenitely need pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18232[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18233[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18234[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18235[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18236[/ATTACH]

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

Slight softness on some, but no major issues.

[wkd001]

Slight softness on some, but no major issues.

Thanks Dana.

Trying my luck with 1,3 and 4 with slight modifications.

Five new ones.


Think it's too soft, maybe even blurry.
Not sure about sharpness here also, and maybe a little obstructed.



Thank you in Advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana.

Trying my luck with 1,3 and 4 with slight modifications.

Five new ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18436[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18437[/ATTACH] Think it's too soft, maybe even blurry.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18438[/ATTACH] Not sure about sharpness here also, and maybe a little obstructed.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18439[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18440[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance.

Best regards,

Wilko

Again, borderline softness on some, but probably passable. Third one needs a tighter crop.

[wkd001]

Again, borderline softness on some, but probably passable. Third one needs a tighter crop.

Great Dana,
Brought only #1 to the queue for this momentand it got accepted.
After absence here due to various reasons I want to bring five new ones for pre-screen.







All nasty contrast but hoping the the best for #4 and #5 as they were taken during my holiday in South Africa when I had short time to shoot some aircraft unfortunately in dull conditions. Thinking myself #4 is better as #5..

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

Great Dana,
Brought only #1 to the queue for this momentand it got accepted.
After absence here due to various reasons I want to bring five new ones for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18978[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18979[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18980[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18981[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18982[/ATTACH]

All nasty contrast but hoping the the best for #4 and #5 as they were taken during my holiday in South Africa when I had short time to shoot some aircraft unfortunately in dull conditions. Thinking myself #4 is better as #5..

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

1. contrast/exposure
2. borderline horizon
3. borderline heat haze, contrast
4. contrast, color
4. contrast, color, soft, noise

[wkd001]

1. contrast/exposure
2. borderline horizon
3. borderline heat haze, contrast
4. contrast, color
4. contrast, color, soft, noise

OK, thanks Dana,

#1,#3 and #5 will remain personal.
Will double check the horizon of #2 before uploading.
Most important question to me. Could #4 be made acceptable (Borderline). It has some flaws of sunlight on the aircraft.
I already made a rought edit on it.(went too far one the color apparently.)
Do have another one with some sunlight, but that one, suffers the same issues as #5.

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

[LX-A343]

OK, thanks Dana,

#1,#3 and #5 will remain personal.
Will double check the horizon of #2 before uploading.
Most important question to me. Could #4 be made acceptable (Borderline). It has some flaws of sunlight on the aircraft.
I already made a rought edit on it.(went too far one the color apparently.)
Do have another one with some sunlight, but that one, suffers the same issues as #5.

Thank you in Advance.

Best Regards,

Wilko

I sincerely doubt, that the last two can be made acceptable.

[wkd001]

I sincerely doubt, that the last two can be made acceptable.

OK, Gerardo,

I aready didn't want to go on with #5, maybe I'll return later with another try of #4.

I''ll try different ones.

Pulled a wrong version into this thread, my apologies.





Thank you in Advance,

Best Regards,

Wilko

[dlowwa]

OK, Gerardo,

I aready didn't want to go on with #5, maybe I'll return later with another try of #4.

I''ll try different ones.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]19026[/ATTACH] Pulled a wrong version into this thread, my apologies.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19027[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19028[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19029[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19030[/ATTACH]

Thank you in Advance,

Best Regards,

Wilko

1. borderline contrast
2-4 ok
5. borderline dark/contrast