Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline contrast
    2-4 ok
    5. borderline dark/contrast
    Thanks Dana.

    The Thai Government aircraft, is that Military or Business Jet, I,m not used to these kind of aircrafts.

    And three new for pre-screen, with at least contrast doubts for me.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3516.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	681.5 KB
ID:	1030719
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3860.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	924.3 KB
ID:	1030720
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3936.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	929.5 KB
ID:	1030721

    Thank you in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

    Comment


    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Thanks Dana.

      The Thai Government aircraft, is that Military or Business Jet, I,m not used to these kind of aircrafts.
      Air Force aircraft are always considered military.

      Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      And three new for pre-screen, with at least contrast doubts for me.

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19095[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19096[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19097[/ATTACH]
      1. ok
      2. horizon (CCW)
      3. too far

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Air Force aircraft are always considered military.



        1. ok
        2. horizon (CCW)
        3. too far
        Thanks Dana,

        Pulled the Etihad in the queue and also the LH after correcting the horizon.

        Want to offer the TAP A321N again as I'm still not sure about it.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3936.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	949.1 KB
ID:	1030855

        And four new ones.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5516.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	510.0 KB
ID:	1030856
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5524.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	417.3 KB
ID:	1030857

        Not sure about at least contrast, exposure and color of these...

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5577.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	763.4 KB
ID:	1030858
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5595.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1030859 Think there is too much garbage in this one...

        Thank you in advance,

        Best Regards,

        Wilko

        Comment


        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
          Thanks Dana,

          Pulled the Etihad in the queue and also the LH after correcting the horizon.

          Want to offer the TAP A321N again as I'm still not sure about it.

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]19266[/ATTACH]

          And four new ones.

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]19267[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]19268[/ATTACH]

          Not sure about at least contrast, exposure and color of these...

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]19269[/ATTACH]
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]19270[/ATTACH] Think there is too much garbage in this one...

          Thank you in advance,

          Best Regards,

          Wilko
          1. borderline soft
          2-3 color/contrast (blue tint/too low)
          4-5 ok

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            1. borderline soft
            2-3 color/contrast (blue tint/too low)
            4-5 ok
            Thank you again for ( also in this case almost confirming my thoughts) your time Dana.

            At 2 and 3 the sun left for a moment, will see what to do with them..

            Some new ones.







            Thank you in Advance.

            Best Regards,

            Wilko

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              Thank you again for ( also in this case almost confirming my thoughts) your time Dana.

              At 2 and 3 the sun left for a moment, will see what to do with them..

              Some new ones.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19333[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19334[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19335[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19336[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19337[/ATTACH]

              Thank you in Advance.

              Best Regards,

              Wilko
              All links are broken.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                All links are broken.
                That's weird, but I had issues while uploading them, I give them another try.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5539.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	424.3 KB
ID:	1030930
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5566.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	825.2 KB
ID:	1030931
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5601-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	750.1 KB
ID:	1030932
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5638.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	704.9 KB
ID:	1030933
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • My apologies, think I made a mistake with uploading. If there is a possibility to check them. Thank you in advance.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                    My apologies, think I made a mistake with uploading. If there is a possibility to check them. Thank you in advance.
                    If possible...

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                      That's weird, but I had issues while uploading them, I give them another try.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19349[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19350[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19351[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]19352[/ATTACH]
                      1. borderline cut off/color
                      2. obstruction
                      3. ok
                      4. borderline soft
                      5. soft, contrast

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        1. borderline cut off/color
                        2. obstruction
                        3. ok
                        4. borderline soft
                        5. soft, contrast
                        Thanks Dana,

                        Will upload #3 and #4 with an addional layer of sharpening

                        Could a tighter crop work for #1, as the entire aircraft was not included in the original? (For example ,closer to the engines and until underneath the main landing gear and atop the tail.)

                        And four new ones.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5516-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	633.7 KB
ID:	1031009 Re-edit of an earlier post, but with still a lot of doubts
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5531-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	654.2 KB
ID:	1031010 Same doubts as for #1
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5549-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	738.2 KB
ID:	1031011
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5563-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	701.6 KB
ID:	1031012

                        Thank you in advance.

                        Best regards.

                        Wilko

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                          Could a tighter crop work for #1, as the entire aircraft was not included in the original? (For example ,closer to the engines and until underneath the main landing gear and atop the tail.)
                          Possibly.

                          Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                          And four new ones.
                          Don't see any major issues.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                            Possibly.



                            Don't see any major issues.
                            Thanks Dana.

                            I will upload all of these four.

                            received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6860883

                            Don't agree with the first two reasons, but missing to add Business Jet Category is my mistake and lack of knowledge with these kind of aircraft.
                            To avoid further words about it, I made a new edit of it.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3837.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	613.2 KB
ID:	1031075

                            And two other ones

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5712-2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	888.4 KB
ID:	1031076
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5742.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	657.0 KB
ID:	1031077

                            I also want to know if night shot is nedded fot these two if acceptable or fixable.

                            Thank you in advance.

                            Best Regards,

                            Wilko

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
                              Thanks Dana.

                              I will upload all of these four.

                              received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6860883

                              Don't agree with the first two reasons, but missing to add Business Jet Category is my mistake and lack of knowledge with these kind of aircraft.
                              To avoid further words about it, I made a new edit of it.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19519[/ATTACH]

                              And two other ones

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19520[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]19521[/ATTACH]

                              I also want to know if night shot is nedded fot these two if acceptable or fixable.

                              Thank you in advance.

                              Best Regards,

                              Wilko
                              Hoi!

                              At first the rejected Picture:
                              The Picture is indeed a tad soft, especially visible at the tail and nose.
                              Furthermore a closer crop would be look much nicer, as the main subject is the aircraft.
                              Beside the classic bizzers like Citation Jets or Learjets, the BBJs from Boeing and the CJs from Airbus need the "Business Jet" categories too.

                              Now the Pictures youd like to get prescreened:

                              #1 crop is much better, probably still a tad soft or heat hazed
                              #2 OK, you could add night shot here but i would not reject if you have not ticked it
                              #3 OK, definitely night shot

                              Have a nice start into the week.
                              Best Regards from Germany,
                              Julian S.​

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                                Hoi!

                                At first the rejected Picture:
                                The Picture is indeed a tad soft, especially visible at the tail and nose.
                                Furthermore a closer crop would be look much nicer, as the main subject is the aircraft.
                                Beside the classic bizzers like Citation Jets or Learjets, the BBJs from Boeing and the CJs from Airbus need the "Business Jet" categories too.

                                Now the Pictures youd like to get prescreened:

                                #1 crop is much better, probably still a tad soft or heat hazed
                                #2 OK, you could add night shot here but i would not reject if you have not ticked it
                                #3 OK, definitely night shot

                                Have a nice start into the week.
                                Guten Tag Julian,

                                Vielen Dank.

                                Thanks a lot for your extensive explanation. it's much appreciated!
                                Found also the sft parts on the nose and top of the aircraft. Tail I don't see tbh.
                                But the heathazing gives me doubts. So I took another shot and edited that one.



                                Abou this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6864064. Raised the exposure on this re-edit.
                                More would it make overexposed in my opinion.



                                And three other ones.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5766.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	708.9 KB
ID:	1031115
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3535.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	877.5 KB
ID:	1031116
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3724.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	749.5 KB
ID:	1031117

                                Thank you in Advance.

                                Best regards,

                                Wilko

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X