wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

Centering is ok, don't think the quality is too bad.

Thank you Dana, will think about uploading the new version of it as I'm not completely certain about it.

Ran into another problem now,

Got this one rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6191209

However, tried to fix the mentioned points in it, but got another shot of the same aircraft seconds earlier.
This is the re-edit of the reject



This the photo taken seconds earlier



Curious which one will stand a better chance.

[LX-A343]

Thank you Dana, will think about uploading the new version of it as I'm not completely certain about it.

Ran into another problem now,

Got this one rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6191209

However, tried to fix the mentioned points in it, but got another shot of the same aircraft seconds earlier.
This is the re-edit of the reject
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11429[/ATTACH]


This the photo taken seconds earlier
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11430[/ATTACH]


Curious which one will stand a better chance.

#1 looks better. The slightly chopped off wing on #2 is a killer.

[wkd001]

#1 looks better. The slightly chopped off wing on #2 is a killer.

Thank you for your quick answer, but in that case I want to know If I've fixed all the problems from the reject properly, especially the contrast.

BTW, as all the screeners might have noticed, I want to keep all my requests, advices, and problems from myself in my own thread, also to try to help you to keep everything a little clear.

[wkd001]

Got another reject today, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6192633

Didn't agree with it, so appealed on it but that was also rejected with a reason I didn't completely understand.
Exposure was already on the border, but got the advice to work on the mid-tones.
However, as I don't know how to do that in LR, I decided to pull up the shadows witt this result.




Want to know if it stands a chance know.

[dlowwa]

Got another reject today, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6192633

Didn't agree with it, so appealed on it but that was also rejected with a reason I didn't completely understand.
Exposure was already on the border, but got the advice to work on the mid-tones.
However, as I don't know how to do that in LR, I decided to pull up the shadows witt this result.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11459[/ATTACH]



Want to know if it stands a chance know.

Probably ok now, though seems a bit yellow.

[wkd001]

Probably ok now, though seems a bit yellow.

Could add a little more exposure by toying with shadows and blacks.
There was a little hue in the photo indeed, but I couldn't describe it as yellow. For safety, I desaturated the yellow tones a little.
The result is in the queue.

Want to offer a some more for pre-screening.

[dlowwa]

Could add a little more exposure by toying with shadows and blacks.
There was a little hue in the photo indeed, but I couldn't describe it as yellow. For safety, I desaturated the yellow tones a little.
The result is in the queue.

Want to offer a some more for pre-screening.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11486[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11487[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11488[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11489[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11490[/ATTACH]

Quality looks fine on all of those.

[wkd001]

Quality looks fine on all of those.

Thanks again Dana.
I want to know if I have to use nightshot for nr.3. I guess I have to to nr. 5.

Got a couple more.





Note to nr.3 : It got rejected earlier today, due to underexposure and dust spot. Removed the bird that caused the dustspot, and increased the exposure by toying with shadows and blacks again.
As the light was pretty hard that day , I didn't want to increase whites and exposure by itself

[dlowwa]

Thanks again Dana.
I want to know if I have to use nightshot for nr.3. I guess I have to to nr. 5.

You can use Night Shot for both.

Got a couple more.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11529[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11530[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11531[/ATTACH]

Note to nr.3 : It got rejected earlier today, due to underexposure and dust spot. Removed the bird that caused the dustspot, and increased the exposure by toying with shadows and blacks again.
As the light was pretty hard that day , I didn't want to increase whites and exposure by itself

1. compression
2. soft, centering
3. ok

[wkd001]

You can use Night Shot for both.



1. compression
2. soft, centering
3. ok

Thanks again Dana.

1. Will remain personal.
2. Will re-edit it when possible.
3. Is already in the queue.

Want to offer some more for pre-screen.

[dlowwa]

Thanks again Dana.

1. Will remain personal.
2. Will re-edit it when possible.
3. Is already in the queue.

Want to offer some more for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11593[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11594[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11595[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11596[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11597[/ATTACH]

1. ok
2. soft
3. ok
4. centering (too low), borderline color
5. ok

[wkd001]

1. ok
2. soft
3. ok
4. centering (too low), borderline color
5. ok

Thank you again Dana.
1,3 and 5 are in the queue.

I want to offer some more for pre-screening.







note to nr 1. Re-edit of one which was too soft in pre-screening in this thread.
Not to nr 3. think it's not working ,but I want to know for sure.

[B7772ADL]

Thank you again Dana.
1,3 and 5 are in the queue.

I want to offer some more for pre-screening.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11672[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11673[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11674[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11675[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11676[/ATTACH]

note to nr 1. Re-edit of one which was too soft in pre-screening in this thread.
Not to nr 3. think it's not working ,but I want to know for sure.

1. Maybe another pass of sharpening
2. Horizon looks off
3. Dark/contrast, horizon
4. Looks ok
5. Horizon.

[wkd001]

1. Maybe another pass of sharpening
2. Horizon looks off
3. Dark/contrast, horizon
4. Looks ok
5. Horizon.

Thank you James.

I only want to know what you mean for nr. 2. Ain't the horizon level?
To me it seems Ok, but maybe I'm wrong. All the photos are taken on days with very variable weather.
Nr 3 will remain personal. Don't think I can get the aircraft brighter as the sky.

this are the re-edits of 1 and 3. (maybe 1 is blurred . Not sure about it at all.)



Got a couple more for pre-screen.

[dlowwa]

Thank you James.

I only want to know what you mean for nr. 2. Ain't the horizon level?
To me it seems Ok, but maybe I'm wrong. All the photos are taken on days with very variable weather.
Nr 3 will remain personal. Don't think I can get the aircraft brighter as the sky.

this are the re-edits of 1 and 3. (maybe 1 is blurred . Not sure about it at all.)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11691[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11692[/ATTACH]

Got a couple more for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11693[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11694[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11695[/ATTACH]

All except the last one would be ok for me; the last one would be a contrast rejection if I screened it.