wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

All except the last one would be ok for me; the last one would be a contrast rejection if I screened it.

Thank you again Dana.

Gave a re-edit to nr 5, just been testing with shadows and blacks coming to this... Think it's too much butI want to know for sure.



Got also this one rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6213963

Made a re-edit of this, but do have doubts especially about the sharpening

[dlowwa]

Thank you again Dana.

Gave a re-edit to nr 5, just been testing with shadows and blacks coming to this... Think it's too much butI want to know for sure.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11732[/ATTACH]

Got also this one rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6213963

Made a re-edit of this, but do have doubts especially about the sharpening

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11733[/ATTACH]

Contrast and soft rejections respectively, for me.

[wkd001]

Contrast and soft rejections respectively, for me.

Dana, after checking it again, the KLM wil remain personal as the aircraft is a tad darker as the background and he shadows were almost pushed tot the max in this case.
The CargoLogic however, is a musthave for me,so I decided to give it another try (If this one fails, I'll try another one).



Aslo some more again for pre-screen.

[dlowwa]

Dana, after checking it again, the KLM wil remain personal as the aircraft is a tad darker as the background and he shadows were almost pushed tot the max in this case.
The CargoLogic however, is a musthave for me,so I decided to give it another try (If this one fails, I'll try another one).

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11782[/ATTACH]

Aslo some more again for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11783[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11784[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11785[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11786[/ATTACH]

1. ok
2. soft
3. low in frame
4. ok
5. ok

[wkd001]

1. ok
2. soft
3. low in frame
4. ok
5. ok

Dana, Thanks Again.

The Kuwait will remain personal as the original was also low in frame . (Don't expect to fix it properly.

Re-editted the BA 787-9 from the previous post.



I do have some more for pre-screen...

[dlowwa]

Dana, Thanks Again.

The Kuwait will remain personal as the original was also low in frame . (Don't expect to fix it properly.

Re-editted the BA 787-9 from the previous post.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11841[/ATTACH]

I do have some more for pre-screen...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]11844[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11843[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11846[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]11848[/ATTACH]

Borderline soft for the first two, and the CX might need a little ccw, otherwise don't see any big problems.

[wkd001]

Borderline soft for the first two, and the CX might need a little ccw, otherwise don't see any big problems.

Thanks Dana.

The CX is in the Queue with some ccw-rotation and a little additional sharpening.

Gave also the BA 789 a little sharpening .As i'm still not completely sure about it, here it is again.



Some more for pre-screen.





Final question for this moment. Got this one rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6227142
Still struggling with this one. made another edit of it, but not sure at all if it's good.
Couls anyone give me advice on it.?

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana.

The CX is in the Queue with some ccw-rotation and a little additional sharpening.

Gave also the BA 789 a little sharpening .As i'm still not completely sure about it, here it is again.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12003[/ATTACH]

Some more for pre-screen.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12004[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12005[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12006[/ATTACH]

Final question for this moment. Got this one rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6227142
Still struggling with this one. made another edit of it, but not sure at all if it's good.
Couls anyone give me advice on it.?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12007[/ATTACH]

1. ok
2. borderline cut off/contrast
3. ok
4. borderline color
5. borderline contrast still. as with #4 there is a slight yellow/cyan cast.

[wkd001]

1. ok
2. borderline cut off/contrast
3. ok
4. borderline color
5. borderline contrast still. as with #4 there is a slight yellow/cyan cast.

Thaks again Dana.

BA en American 787's are in the queue.
Will give the Kuwait a try apparently,as I got a similar shot with an EK A380 in the database.

Here are nr 4 and 5 from the previous posts again.
Tried to fix them. But I think I'll let the Iberia go as the sky seems to be blown out to me right now...
The Dash gives me doubt about the contrast right now...

[LX-A343]

Thaks again Dana.

BA en American 787's are in the queue.
Will give the Kuwait a try apparently,as I got a similar shot with an EK A380 in the database.

Here are nr 4 and 5 from the previous posts again.
Tried to fix them. But I think I'll let the Iberia go as the sky seems to be blown out to me right now...
The Dash gives me doubt about the contrast right now...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12115[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12116[/ATTACH]

1 still borderline colour and IMO also soft
2 contrast, colour

[wkd001]

1 still borderline colour and IMO also soft
2 contrast, colour

Gerido, thanks for your time...Maybe I will try the Dash later once More. Won't spend any energy to the Iberia anymore.

Finally had the time and the opportunty to shoot some new material. I would like to offer five for pre-screen.
However as this was one of the few occasions to shoot for me in this conditions, I am curious...

[Alex - Spot-This !]

1) nice but maybe needs a little 0.2 CCW rotation to it
2)) ok
3) Great light but editing should improve the mid tones which are too dark
4) ok
5) ok

Regards
Alex

[wkd001]

1) nice but maybe needs a little 0.2 CCW rotation to it
2)) ok
3) Great light but editing should improve the mid tones which are too dark
4) ok
5) ok

Regards
Alex

A big Thank you to you Alex.

Gave the Air China Cargo 0.18 CCW (According my Lightroom), added a small amount of sharpness to it due to smaller crop and puted it in the queue.

The TAP gives me more problems at this moment.
Could toy with shadows and exposure and light although I think it's not enough
If I should add more, my histogram runs too far to the right in my opinion.



Also two more for pre-screen...

[dlowwa]

A big Thank you to you Alex.

Gave the Air China Cargo 0.18 CCW (According my Lightroom), added a small amount of sharpness to it due to smaller crop and puted it in the queue.

The TAP gives me more problems at this moment.
Could toy with shadows and exposure and light although I think it's not enough
If I should add more, my histogram runs too far to the right in my opinion.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12164[/ATTACH]

Also two more for pre-screen...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12165[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12166[/ATTACH]

All are lacking contrast and have a slight green tint.

The first also has other issues like noise, and what looks like poor dust removal above the aircraft so would be rejected for manipulation/overprocessing.

Third has a visible dust spot.

[wkd001]

All are lacking contrast and have a slight green tint.

The first also has other issues like noise, and what looks like poor dust removal above the aircraft so would be rejected for manipulation/overprocessing.

Third has a visible dust spot.

Dana, thank you for your words. Do understand what you're saying, Don't know how to fix everything properly.
Having issues with several pre-screened and rejected shots with casts
Has it something to do with white balance.
With the KLM 789, could desaturate the green colours, and also gave it more contrast, but for my idea, it doesn't care
As earlier mentioned, i could play with midtones/shadows, but with the low sun, I don't think will help, because the histogram will fall too far to the right.
It's included again



For comparison I include another KLM shot of a T7, (also for pre-screen) but I think it will suffer the same fate. It has for me the same story as the 789.



I will re-work the TK A320, later to remove the dust-spot properly I deerly forgot ( )and the other mentioned points.:
The TAP A319 will remain personal As I don't know how to remove the noise field properly in only lightroom. ( I don't have PS)