wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

Yes, some soft spots.

Thanks Dana, Will study it and try to fix it.
If not Fixable I'll leave it.

[wkd001]

After some trying, the different image uploading works for me as well.


Hello, I would like to have a prescreen on this image.
Especially for ( too much) contrast and if the glare is not too disturbing.

Thank you in advance.

[dlowwa]

After some trying, the different image uploading works for me as well.


Hello, I would like to have a prescreen on this image.
Especially for ( too much) contrast and if the glare is not too disturbing.

Dark/contrast.

[wkd001]

Hello,

I've received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11921430 , but I disagree on it.
The histogram shows no underexposure to me ,Adding more exposure would blow out the nose I think
I see almost everything from the aircraft, So I dio not really see the contrast issue also.
Any guidance would be appreciated.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I've received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11921430 , but I disagree on it.
The histogram shows no underexposure to me ,Adding more exposure would blow out the nose I think
I see almost everything from the aircraft, So I dio not really see the contrast issue also.
Any guidance would be appreciated.

Contrast is too harsh.

[wkd001]

Contrast is too harsh.

Ok Thanks Dana.
I worked on another shot of it just a bit earlier .Tried to tone down the contrast but now it looks underexposed to me


I would like to know if this one has a better chance of getting accepted.

Further I would like to have a prescreen for this image, but I think contrast /heathaze./softness will make it a no go.


Final question,

I'm struggling with this reject,https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11918472
I think it looks too pink ,but I can't really correct it properly.The pink tone remains and i can't really get it while correcting color/ and/or white balance
Any guidance would be appreciated

Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

I would like to know if this one has a better chance of getting accepted.

Further I would like to have a prescreen for this image, but I think contrast /heathaze./softness will make it a no go.


Final question,

I'm struggling with this reject,
I think it looks too pink ,but I can't really correct it properly.The pink tone remains and i can't really get it while correcting color/ and/or white balance
Any guidance would be appreciated

1. borderline soft
2. soft, contrast
3. slight magenta cast. would have been ok for me

[wkd001]

1. borderline soft
2. soft, contrast
3. slight magenta cast. would have been ok for me

Thank you again for your time Dana,

Unfortunately I have a question a bout another reject,

Is this one really too dark ,or does this also haven too harsh contrast. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11938701

Because for me it's not too dark an the histogran does also not point into too dark for me

Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Thank you again for your time Dana,

Unfortunately I have a question a bout another reject,

Is this one really too dark ,or does this also haven too harsh contrast. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11938701

Because for me it's not too dark an the histogran does also not point into too dark for me

Thank you in advance

Contrast, not dark.

[wkd001]

Contrast, not dark.

Thank You Dana,

It's too harsh I assume?
And i also assume the same story goes up for this one?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11957212

Thank you in Advance?

[dlowwa]

Thank You Dana,

It's too harsh I assume?
And i also assume the same story goes up for this one?

Yes.

[wkd001]

Yes.

Thanks Dana,

As I thought.

I've reworkes this one, would this one be better. Especially in terms of contrast.




I also got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11976546 , but this time for color.
I am stunned by the reason as i really have no idea what's wrong with the color here. So any guidance would be appreciated .

Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana,

As I thought.

I've reworkes this one, would this one be better. Especially in terms of contrast.

I also got this one rejected again, but this time for color.
I am stunned by the reason as i really have no idea what's wrong with the color here. So any guidance would be appreciated .

Both dark/harshly contrasted. Don't really see any color issue.

[wkd001]

Both dark/harshly contrasted. Don't really see any color issue.

OK . Thanks Dana,

This gives me two questions

If I would appeal the last photo (ANA 77W), can it be rejected on appeal for too harsh contrast (or underexposure)?

Other question, are these photos even salvageable, given the lght conditions?
- I want to notice , that with ANA , ths sun is completely in my back.
- With the Virgin it is not, ( on around 90 degrees corner on my RH side) but on my side, but probably the angle is too bad for getting acceptable photos out of it in terms of acceptable contrast.

Thanks in Advance

[dlowwa]

OK . Thanks Dana,

This gives me two questions

If I would appeal the last photo (ANA 77W), can it be rejected on appeal for too harsh contrast (or underexposure)?

Other question, are these photos even salvageable, given the lght conditions?
- I want to notice , that with ANA , ths sun is completely in my back.
- With the Virgin it is not, ( on around 90 degrees corner on my RH side) but on my side, but probably the angle is too bad for getting acceptable photos out of it in terms of acceptable contrast.

Thanks in Advance

Might be fixable. Appealed images are re-screened, so any new issues might be added.