Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. a bit soft towards the nose
    2. contrast. not fixable.
    3. don't see heat haze as an issue
    Thanks a lot Dana, I can continue with that.

    Unfortunately , I ran into some other issues so I would like a prescreen on some other photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8744.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	526.8 KB
ID:	1168657

    Would this be passable as an airport overview. Are there motive and/or quality issues here.
    if not, which category exactly should I select/ overview/ runway?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8919-2.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	337.5 KB
ID:	1168658
    Does the crossing flock of goose add something to the photo here?
    Or would this just be an ordinary obstruction reject?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8911-2.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	318.6 KB
ID:	1168659

    Is the glare/reflection on the tail too distracting here?/Are there any other issues?

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello,

    I've received this reject for soft, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11208558 , but I don't see it being way too soft.\
    So any guidance here would be appreciated.

    Furthermore I would like a prescreen on some photos.

    Especially on contrast and color. Personally I think it;s a no-go for JP.

    Especially on heathaze/softness. Despite rainshowers there was still a lot of heathaze.
    1. a bit soft towards the nose
    2. contrast. not fixable.
    3. don't see heat haze as an issue

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Hello,

    I've received this reject for soft, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11208558 , but I don't see it being way too soft.\
    So any guidance here would be appreciated.

    Furthermore I would like a prescreen on some photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2345-2-3.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	486.2 KB
ID:	1168144

    Especially on contrast and color. Personally I think it;s a no-go for JP.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2311.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	518.5 KB
ID:	1168145

    Especially on heathaze/softness. Despite rainshowers there was still a lot of heathaze.

    Many thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1-3. contrast a bit harsh for both, but second totally fine, I accepted it.
    4. dark/contrast yes, not backlit. new version borderline at best.

    5 images per day, sorry, don't have time for more.
    Thanks a lot for accepting the Condor A339 Dana.
    It's highly appreciated.

    I see you being very busy with everything here indeed so I will put your judgingj on the LH 748 also on the Qatar retro with a lower chance of accepting it due to the dark tail
    The Suparna I will figure out myself.

    Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello,

    Due to things happened in the last few days I feel the need to reactivate my thread again.
    1-3. contrast a bit harsh for both, but second totally fine, I accepted it.
    4. dark/contrast yes, not backlit. new version borderline at best.

    5 images per day, sorry, don't have time for more.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Hello,

    Due to things happened in the last few days I feel the need to reactivate my thread again.

    At first this one.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11112309.

    Can't really figure out if here is too much or too litlle (I think too much), but on the other hand i think this one is not that bad.
    So any guidance in correcting this one would be appreciated.

    At second this one.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Understanding for myself that this one is too much , I already attempted a re-edit of this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1695-2-3.JPG
Views:	98
Size:	333.1 KB
ID:	1165057

    I would like to know , if this one is still too harsh (Could well be), and if there is any posibility to get it better.

    I agree they are taken on the worst part of the day in summer (around 2 pm)

    At third this one,

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Disagree on the backlit note, but on the other hand and other rejects reason in mind, I could imagine it also.

    Maybe this re-edit could fix (most) of the issues , so i would also like a prescreen on this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8199-2.JPG
Views:	75
Size:	303.5 KB
ID:	1165058
    Sun was tricky, almost straight above the runway.

    The same story, for the following photo.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8183-2-3.JPG
Views:	75
Size:	367.8 KB
ID:	1165059

    I also would like a prescreen on this one, ( I know it's from the same sequence, but with this difficult light conditions , I would still appreciate a second eye over it.)
    As the tail is dark of this livery, I'm afraid this one can't pass due to the contrast/ light conditions.

    At final i would like a prescreen on this photo.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1990.JPG
Views:	76
Size:	463.2 KB
ID:	1165060

    Biggest potential issues for me could be heathaze/soft and noise.

    Many thanks in advance.




    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks for that Dana.

    I would like prescreen for three other photos.
    1. soft, contrast
    2. contrast
    3. dark

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. dark/contrast
    2-4. borderline soft
    Thanks for that Dana.

    I would like prescreen for three other photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0789.JPG
Views:	88
Size:	369.4 KB
ID:	1161033
    Another attempt on the French A330MRTT as I deem the other one unfixable.
    Not sure here on angle, sharpness, exposure and contrast.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0669.JPG
Views:	82
Size:	310.0 KB
ID:	1161034
    Probably bad contrast, exposure, heat haze and maybe more.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7122.JPG
Views:	82
Size:	300.6 KB
ID:	1161035
    I think this one is soft, but can't figure it out for sure.

    Many thanks in advance.





    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    also I would like prescreen for some photos
    1. dark/contrast
    2-4. borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not sure that it's vignetting or just a darker area of the sky. Vignetting tends to affect more than just a single corner.

    Contrast is also pretty harsh.
    Thanks Dana,

    I've reduced the contrast and uploaded it,

    But apparently I didn't correct the contrast properly as it got rejected today for contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10986079.
    Also for overprocessed, ((the vignetting or halo), but i've checked it again and i did not touch highlight,shadows, or clarity.I edited it on my normal way.
    As there is clearly some kind of halo to see in the cheeck for dust tool. I'm very curious what could have caused it as I'm 100% sure it's not caused by my processing.
    The only thing I could imagine is some kind of reflection in my lens (or a short flare) as the aircraft was flying over a canal.
    I also got some photos accepted from that day from the same spot with same gear and similar editing.

    also I would like prescreen for some photos

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0785-2.JPG
Views:	120
Size:	349.9 KB
ID:	1159870
    Afraid for color, contrast, sharpness and noise.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7333.JPG
Views:	91
Size:	789.7 KB
ID:	1159871
    Worried about possible obstruction (aircraft is longer parked though) and horizon.
    A try at 1600pix, if too soft. I also have a 1280 version.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7216-2-2.JPG
Views:	89
Size:	348.9 KB
ID:	1159872
    Mainly about contrast and sharpness

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0479-4.JPG
Views:	88
Size:	401.5 KB
ID:	1159873

    Sharpness, contrast and color. Short before sunset.

    Many thanks in Advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks again Dana,

    I've reworked the third and tried my luck with it.

    I've got one question now.

    I've prepared this photo,

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7097-2.JPG
Views:	107
Size:	367.2 KB
ID:	1158541

    When I equalize this one in my Lightroom, I see something what looks like heavy vignetting, but apparently I'm blind for it to see it in the photo myself.

    I would appreciate a second look over it.

    Many thanks in advance.
    Not sure that it's vignetting or just a darker area of the sky. Vignetting tends to affect more than just a single corner.

    Contrast is also pretty harsh.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1-3. yes borderline dark/harsh contrast. #3 might be fixable.
    4. soft, borderline centering
    5. borderline cut off (awkward crop)
    Thanks again Dana,

    I've reworked the third and tried my luck with it.

    I've got one question now.

    I've prepared this photo,

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7097-2.JPG
Views:	107
Size:	367.2 KB
ID:	1158541

    When I equalize this one in my Lightroom, I see something what looks like heavy vignetting, but apparently I'm blind for it to see it in the photo myself.

    I would appreciate a second look over it.

    Many thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I've collected some photo's which I'm unsure about, so I would like to offer these for prescreen,
    1-3. yes borderline dark/harsh contrast. #3 might be fixable.
    4. soft, borderline centering
    5. borderline cut off (awkward crop)

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Rejected image needs CW rotation.

    1. dark/contrast
    2. horizon, borderline heat haze
    3. soft
    4. ok for me
    Thanks for everthing Dana.
    The fourth got accepted today.

    I've collected some photo's which I'm unsure about, so I would like to offer these for prescreen,

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0291-2.JPG
Views:	135
Size:	311.6 KB
ID:	1157896
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7042-2.JPG
Views:	119
Size:	330.3 KB
ID:	1157897
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7071-2.JPG
Views:	123
Size:	311.9 KB
ID:	1157898
    For all these three I see potential issues with backlit and (harsh) contrast

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0001.JPG
Views:	124
Size:	326.0 KB
ID:	1157899
    Not sure on softness, contrast and exposure on this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9919.JPG
Views:	122
Size:	665.5 KB
ID:	1157900

    Especially on the crop as the entire aircraft (wings) was not included in the original. Do not want to cut the tail off.Could be soft also.
    Otherwise this will be a no-go for me

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked it and new version got accepted,

    Today, I've received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10890334
    Probably by a screener with very good eyes as I have no clue what's unlevel about it.Pole seems straight to me.

    Also I would like a prescreen for a couple of photo's which I'm unsure about.
    Rejected image needs CW rotation.

    1. dark/contrast
    2. horizon, borderline heat haze
    3. soft
    4. ok for me

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X