wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

Might be fixable. Appealed images are re-screened, so any new issues might be added.

Thanks Dana,

After your answer, I remembered that already happened to me once. An appealed photo got rejected for another reasons, for what i appealed it.
So I leave the ANA 77W for the moment.

Today I got another reject for harsh contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12002331 ., which dazzles me a little
This one got accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11427862 , was taken straigth after the rejected photo, and has for me the same contrast,
Probably the reject is overexposed on top? (histogram has also a spike to the right side) Which could lead to the harsh contrast reject?

Do I see this right or is there something else going on?

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana,

After your answer, I remembered that already happened to me once. An appealed photo got rejected for another reasons, for what i appealed it.
So I leave the ANA 77W for the moment.

Today I got another reject for harsh contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12002331 ., which dazzles me a little
This one got accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11427862 , was taken straigth after the rejected photo, and has for me the same contrast,
Probably the reject is overexposed on top? (histogram has also a spike to the right side) Which could lead to the harsh contrast reject?

Do I see this right or is there something else going on?

Pretty similar, both borderline, imho. If you want to be optimistic, both should have been accepted; if you want to be pessimistic, both should have been rejected.

[wkd001]

Hello,

I['ve received this reject for dust spots https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12188283
I've obviously missed one in the mountain.
If I correct that one properly , would it still be considered manipulation.

I can't attach any attachments anymore as also the second way for uploading photos (example in the sticky above) is not working for me anymore

Thanks in Advance

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I['ve received this reject for dust spots https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12188283
I've obviously missed one in the mountain.
If I correct that one properly , would it still be considered manipulation.

I can't attach any attachments anymore as also the second way for uploading photos (example in the sticky above) is not working for me anymore

Thanks in Advance

Removing dust spots is not considered manipulation.

[wkd001]

Hello,

I've received this reject,https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12280297 . But don't really understand it.
I agree light is a bit hazy, but in my idea there is enough sunlight.
Adding more exposure would blow out the nose section and maybe mix the aircraft with the sky
Lifting shadows would also destroy the contrast,

Could this on be made acceptable?

Thanl you for an answer

[dlowwa]

Could this on be made acceptable?

Not sure, white aircraft on white sky is tricky.

[wkd001]

Not sure, white aircraft on white sky is tricky.

Thanks Dana,

Probably I will leave it (for at least a while)

Another Question.

Is this one really too soft? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12296540


I don't really see it, so if really I would like to know how sharpening I have to add, and if it's fixable.

Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana,

Probably I will leave it (for at least a while)

Another Question.

Is this one really too soft? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12296540


I don't really see it, so if really I would like to know how sharpening I have to add, and if it's fixable.

Thanks in advance

Yes, looks soft. Quality of the original would dictate how fixable it is.