wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

They can't really be more specific if they're giving the wrong reason, can they? Maybe you meant to say please reject for the correct reasons? In that case, keep in mind the above opinion (contrast problem rather than exposure problem) is only my opinion, and others may in fact agree that the image is too dark.

Yes, I meant indeed please reject for the right reasons. My apologies for the misunderstanding. And also for the long discuss, as I didnt want to get rude or unpolite, but went too difficult in making my point.

[dlowwa]

That screeners will be as specific as possible with their reject reasons, because apparently the wrong reason was given here and it's not the first time, I get confused on a reject.

They can't really be more specific if they're giving the wrong reason, can they? Maybe you meant to say please reject for the correct reasons? In that case, keep in mind the above opinion (contrast problem rather than exposure problem) is only my opinion, and others may in fact agree that the image is too dark.

[wkd001]

Well, it was rejected so apparently yes.



Not sure what you are asking (if anything).

That screeners will be as specific as possible with their reject reasons, because apparently the wrong reason was given here and it's not the first time, I get confused on a reject.
And if you agree with this reject, as I don't. So I'm still considering appealing on this one.

[dlowwa]

OK, thanks Dana.
But is it too harsh for reject here?

Well, it was rejected so apparently yes.

So I could maybe reduce the contrast here,but for sure I would have to blow out the highlights in that case.
Sorry for maybe annoying here, but please let the screeners be very specific in this kind of cases, as this is not the first time, this happens.

Not sure what you are asking (if anything).

[wkd001]

Exposure is ok, but contrast is a bit harsh. That's what the screener probably saw.

OK, thanks Dana.
But is it too harsh for reject here?
The conditions were also very contrasty here, with dark clouds and strong sun sometimes.
So I could maybe reduce the contrast here,but for sure I would have to blow out the highlights in that case.
Sorry for maybe annoying here, but please let the screeners be very specific in this kind of cases, as this is not the first time, this happens.

Regards

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your thoughts Dana,

I've decided to appeal and the appeal got accepted.

Unfortunately I've received another reject today, which I do not reeally agree with.
This one got rejected for underexposed. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9813502
The histogram here on the reject page is fully stretched.
Maybe I could add a very tiny touch of exposure, but the highlights on the back of the aircraft and on the buildings are for me pretty close to being blown out.
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in advance and regards.

Exposure is ok, but contrast is a bit harsh. That's what the screener probably saw.

[wkd001]

I don't see anything that tells me it is unlevel (or level for that matter), so would have been ok for me.

Thank you for your thoughts Dana,

I've decided to appeal and the appeal got accepted.

Unfortunately I've received another reject today, which I do not reeally agree with.
This one got rejected for underexposed. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9813502
The histogram here on the reject page is fully stretched.
Maybe I could add a very tiny touch of exposure, but the highlights on the back of the aircraft and on the buildings are for me pretty close to being blown out.
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in advance and regards.

[dlowwa]

Hello

At first all the best for 2022 for everyone reading and following this thread.

At second.
I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9756072 for horizon unlevel.
As I really don't see this issue here and no further explanation was given in the mail, I would like some guidance here as there is no clear horizon visible imho.
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in Advance and regards.

I don't see anything that tells me it is unlevel (or level for that matter), so would have been ok for me.

[Calvin L]

Hello

At first all the best for 2022 for everyone reading and following this thread.

At second.
I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9756072 for horizon unlevel.
As I really don't see this issue here and no further explanation was given in the mail, I would like some guidance here as there is no clear horizon visible imho.
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in Advance and regards.

Hello, I'm not a crew.
I suggest to horizon it with the long horizontal line of the brown grass
Happy New Year 2022

[wkd001]

Hello

At first all the best for 2022 for everyone reading and following this thread.

At second.
I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9756072 for horizon unlevel.
As I really don't see this issue here and no further explanation was given in the mail, I would like some guidance here as there is no clear horizon visible imho.
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in Advance and regards.

[dlowwa]

Thank you for that Dana.

Still confused about that spot, as it not appeared on other phots from the same day ,with same camera and around that time of the day with similar conditions.
Anyway I've rworked and tried to fix it, but as I'm still unsure on this one, I would like to offer it for prescreen here.
Biggest potential issue here is dust/processing now. Maybe also exposure.

I would also like to offer another one for prescreen.
Biggest potential issues here are also dust/dirty sky/ processing (lot of garbage in original file) alos exposure, sharpness and contrast here.

Both a bit dark/harsh contrast, but otherwise ok for me.

[wkd001]

1. yes big dust spot in top part of frame.
2. crop is ok for me.

Thank you for that Dana.

Still confused about that spot, as it not appeared on other phots from the same day ,with same camera and around that time of the day with similar conditions.
Anyway I've rworked and tried to fix it, but as I'm still unsure on this one, I would like to offer it for prescreen here.
Biggest potential issue here is dust/processing now. Maybe also exposure.

I would also like to offer another one for prescreen.
Biggest potential issues here are also dust/dirty sky/ processing (lot of garbage in original file) alos exposure, sharpness and contrast here.

Thanks in advance and regards

[dlowwa]

Thanks for that Dana,

I've queued the second, reworked, resized and queued the third also. If it fails so be it.

Yesterday I received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9664244 for probably dust spot(s)but I got a question about it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1637231698.jpg shows a black spot on top near the center of the frame, but I can't really figure about what it really is. It's not visible in the equalizer of my lightroom and not on the edited version for me also.
The previous reject i had for Dust spots was really clear for me. ( was an Easyjet in Brussels). I did wrong correcting them
Unfortunately I can't attach the RAW-file here.
So I would like a more explanation here. Maybe I miss something deeply.

Second question is a request of prescreen for this image.
The entire aircraft was not included in the RAW-file .So I would like to know if this crop is suitable for a narrowbody. It looks a bit odd now to me. If there is anything else here, I would like to know as well.

Thanks in Advance and Regards

1. yes big dust spot in top part of frame.
2. crop is ok for me.

[wkd001]

1. contrast. not fixable.
2. ok for me. not a jet, so not Business Jet/
3-4. soft, need a little CW rotation

Thanks for that Dana,

I've queued the second, reworked, resized and queued the third also. If it fails so be it.

Yesterday I received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9664244 for probably dust spot(s)but I got a question about it.
https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1637231698.jpg shows a black spot on top near the center of the frame, but I can't really figure about what it really is. It's not visible in the equalizer of my lightroom and not on the edited version for me also.
The previous reject i had for Dust spots was really clear for me. ( was an Easyjet in Brussels). I did wrong correcting them
Unfortunately I can't attach the RAW-file here.
So I would like a more explanation here. Maybe I miss something deeply.

Second question is a request of prescreen for this image.
The entire aircraft was not included in the RAW-file .So I would like to know if this crop is suitable for a narrowbody. It looks a bit odd now to me. If there is anything else here, I would like to know as well.

Thanks in Advance and Regards

[dlowwa]

Thanks a lot for that Dana, I've queued the revised version.

Now I would like a pre-screen for the following photos,

1. contrast. not fixable.
2. ok for me. not a jet, so not Business Jet/
3-4. soft, need a little CW rotation