If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
First would be a contrast rejection, second more borderline but acceptable for me.
Thanks a lot Dana.
I've queued only the second one.
I would like pre-screen/advice on the following image. My biggest concerns are sharpening and heathaze. It's a heavy crop so I already resized it also pretty big. If there are any other issues I would like to know as well.
I would like pre-screen/advice on the following image. My biggest concerns are sharpening and heathaze. It's a heavy crop so I already resized it also pretty big. If there are any other issues I would like to know as well.
Unfortunately I forgot to ask earlier, so I do it now and apologies also for not combining it with the first post.
But I also would like a prescreen on this shot.
It's a heavy crop also, but I think its way too soft and maybe even blurry, but a second look would be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
Unfortunately I forgot to ask earlier, so I do it now and apologies also for not combining it with the first post.
But I also would like a prescreen on this shot.
It's a heavy crop also, but I think its way too soft and maybe even blurry, but a second look would be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
1: How can I recognise compression? As the last photo was a very heavy crop, I think that might clear it a little up.
2: Off topic, and maybe unpolite, if so, please apologise. But the last period i've seen at last two photos which where in my eyes wrongly accepted. One cut off and one obstructed.
As I won't fall down to others I'm not going to give links here, but is there a way to report this?
1: How can I recognise compression? As the last photo was a very heavy crop, I think that might clear it a little up.
Hard one to quantify specifically. Can appear as compression artifacts if it's due to save settings, or blotchy sky/smeared fine details if it's due to sensor issues or heavy cropping.
2: Off topic, and maybe unpolite, if so, please apologise. But the last period i've seen at last two photos which where in my eyes wrongly accepted. One cut off and one obstructed.
As I won't fall down to others I'm not going to give links here, but is there a way to report this?
In that case I would like prescreen also for this one also,
Different snap for the Aeroflot 77W Biggest worries are here also contrast, sharpness and maybe also horizon and exposure.
The sun just peeped out, but through a lot of hazy clouds. For the moment I'll drop the snap from my previous post.
In that case I would like prescreen also for this one also,
Different snap for the Aeroflot 77W Biggest worries are here also contrast, sharpness and maybe also horizon and exposure.
The sun just peeped out, but through a lot of hazy clouds. For the moment I'll drop the snap from my previous post.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards.
This would be rejected for contrast, and possibly soft. First one is better.
This would be rejected for contrast, and possibly soft. First one is better.
OK Dana,
With the monotone grey sky and the angle of the light in mind I should have known better in this case. My apologies for that.
So I made a re edit of the first attempt. I would be great If you (or someone else ofcourse) could take a look at it. I've tried to add more sharpening, added a verytiny touch more contrast (Although I know it almost can't better as borderline) and resized it a litlle further.
I also have another question:
I've received this reject: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7909623 for softness.
I don't really agree with this one as all the hard lines are visible here.
Maybe to the nose it will get questionable and the fact that this one is 1600 wide probably doesn't favour that.
For surance I made a re-edit at 1280 wide, maybe that is better otherwise, so if it can be checked, hat would be nice.
I'll attach it underneath. Thanks in advance.
With the monotone grey sky and the angle of the light in mind I should have known better in this case. My apologies for that.
So I made a re edit of the first attempt. I would be great If you (or someone else ofcourse) could take a look at it. I've tried to add more sharpening, added a verytiny touch more contrast (Although I know it almost can't better as borderline) and resized it a litlle further.
I also have another question:
I've received this reject: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7909623 for softness.
I don't really agree with this one as all the hard lines are visible here.
Maybe to the nose it will get questionable and the fact that this one is 1600 wide probably doesn't favour that.
For surance I made a re-edit at 1280 wide, maybe that is better otherwise, so if it can be checked, hat would be nice.
I'll attach it underneath. Thanks in advance.
Rejected image borderline, but would have been ok for me. If you want to appeal, wait about 4-5 hours before submitting (after midnight in Europe) if you want the best chances at success
Don't see much difference with the 'improved' version, to be honest.
Luckily the Aeroflot 77W got accepted as was the appeal for the Delta A330-300, Thanks a lot to all involved for that.
Now I have another question. Normally I wouldn't upload shots as these anymore due to the bad conditions.
But as this is a Hot Photo (Frame received the new livery lately and there a no photos with new livery in the DB), I could consider it.
Are there made exceptions for these things ( or more lenient screening) Or shall I just forget it???
I checked the guidelines, but couldn't find a proper answer, so maybe one of you could halep me out.
If it's a no go, No problem as i would totally accept that.
Luckily the Aeroflot 77W got accepted as was the appeal for the Delta A330-300, Thanks a lot to all involved for that.
Now I have another question. Normally I wouldn't upload shots as these anymore due to the bad conditions.
But as this is a Hot Photo (Frame received the new livery lately and there a no photos with new livery in the DB), I could consider it.
Are there made exceptions for these things ( or more lenient screening) Or shall I just forget it???
I checked the guidelines, but couldn't find a proper answer, so maybe one of you could halep me out.
If it's a no go, No problem as i would totally accept that.
Thank in advance for the answer.
Best regards.
Contrast/quality is too poor to be overlooked, especially since it is very likely the aircraft will be seen again soon in better conditions.
Contrast/quality is too poor to be overlooked, especially since it is very likely the aircraft will be seen again soon in better conditions.
OK Dana,
I already expected something like this (only needed a sort od confirmation of thoughts tbh) so I won't upload. It can serve other targets.
Unfortunately we don't have a lot of great weather at AMS lately. Average is one good day around two weeks
Last saturday we had sunny periods, so I went out also (image above was from today), but ran into another issue. I caught this particar aircraft during her take-off, but caught it also at LHR in 2017. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8695733
As the angle is quite similar I'm afraid for a similar reject, if I decide to upload.
Could you (or someone els ofcourse) help me out on this.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment