wkd001- Editing advice

[dlowwa]

OK Dana,

I already expected something like this (only needed a sort od confirmation of thoughts tbh) so I won't upload. It can serve other targets.
Unfortunately we don't have a lot of great weather at AMS lately. Average is one good day around two weeks
Last saturday we had sunny periods, so I went out also (image above was from today), but ran into another issue.
I caught this particar aircraft during her take-off, but caught it also at LHR in 2017. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8695733
As the angle is quite similar I'm afraid for a similar reject, if I decide to upload.
Could you (or someone els ofcourse) help me out on this.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

Different enough angle, and different location so shouldn't be considered similar.

[wkd001]

Different enough angle, and different location so shouldn't be considered similar.

Thanks Dana I''ll give it a go,

Could you (or someone else ofcourse) give a presceen on these photos?
Biggest worry for me here is the centering. Also contrast (harsh) and sharpening could be points.

Biggest worries are contrast(low, hopefully borderline) and sharpness.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana I''ll give it a go,

Could you (or someone else ofcourse) give a presceen on these photos?
Biggest worry for me here is the centering. Also contrast (harsh) and sharpening could be points.

Biggest worries are contrast(low, hopefully borderline) and sharpness.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

1. dark, soft
2. dark/contrast

[wkd001]

1. dark, soft
2. dark/contrast

OK Thanks Dana,

I've tried to rework the SAS. Exposure should be better, added more shrpening and reduced the final size of the jpg.
I would be nice if you (or omeone else ofcourse) could shine a light over it.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

OK Thanks Dana,

I've tried to rework the SAS. Exposure should be better, added more shrpening and reduced the final size of the jpg.
I would be nice if you (or omeone else ofcourse) could shine a light over it.

Still too dark.

[wkd001]

Still too dark.

OK Dana,

The only thing i can do in this case in my opinion is to lift up the shadows further in my opinion.
Added more exposure as such will lead to blown out highlights and also contrast/overprocessing issues in my opinion

Do I see this right or is it maybe even a lost case here.

Thanks in advance for an answer.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

OK Dana,

The only thing i can do in this case in my opinion is to lift up the shadows further in my opinion.
Added more exposure as such will lead to blown out highlights and also contrast/overprocessing issues in my opinion

Do I see this right or is it maybe even a lost case here.

Thanks in advance for an answer.

Best Regards.

Overall the whole image is quite dark, but unfortunately the angle is such there is glare on the tail that would like be blown out if you properly exposed the rest of the image. Try to find a frame without the glare.

[wkd001]

Hello,

I would like a pre-screen on the following image.


An earlier snap got rejected for blurry and underexposure. I would like to know if this one is better on the mentioned facts and if there are other issues present. For examle contrast or glare

My second question is about this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8039390

It doesn't fit really well with me as most of the hard lines are visible and the less ones are softened by the light in my opinion.

If I'm judging wrong here I would like to know if it can fit on a proper re-edit on lower resolution

Thanks in advance for the time.

Best Regards

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I would like a pre-screen on the following image.


An earlier snap got rejected for blurry and underexposure. I would like to know if this one is better on the mentioned facts and if there are other issues present. For examle contrast or glare

My second question is about this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8039390

It doesn't fit really well with me as most of the hard lines are visible and the less ones are softened by the light in my opinion.

If I'm judging wrong here I would like to know if it can fit on a proper re-edit on lower resolution

Thanks in advance for the time.

Best Regards

I'd consider them both borderline for soft. Not terribly soft, but not really sharp either. First might be a bit harder to fix as there's also a contrast issue. Second one just needs a little more sharpening.

[wkd001]

I'd consider them both borderline for soft. Not terribly soft, but not really sharp either. First might be a bit harder to fix as there's also a contrast issue. Second one just needs a little more sharpening.

OK,thanks Dana,

I've tried my luck with an (in my eyes) improved of the Delta A359.

Now I would like pre-screen on these images.

My biggest worries here are the crop. (complete aircraft is not included on the original, original is not that different), obstruction, exposure, contrast and horizon.

Biggest worry here is heathaze. Aircraft was parked on the runway due to covid-19 pandemic.

Several aircrafts parked on the runway. is some kind like this acceptable?,.I wanted to include all the parked aircraft on the runway Would this be an airport overview or a runway overview.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

[dlowwa]

OK,thanks Dana,

I've tried my luck with an (in my eyes) improved of the Delta A359.

Now I would like pre-screen on these images.

My biggest worries here are the crop. (complete aircraft is not included on the original, original is not that different), obstruction, exposure, contrast and horizon.

Biggest worry here is heathaze. Aircraft was parked on the runway due to covid-19 pandemic.

Several aircrafts parked on the runway. is some kind like this acceptable?,.I wanted to include all the parked aircraft on the runway Would this be an airport overview or a runway overview.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards.

1. dirty. crop ok.
2-3 borderline soft.

#3 overview, either ramp or runway, whatever it is they're parked on.

[wkd001]

Good evening.

I would like prescreen on two images.

I deleted this one from the queue.The contrast is the biggest issue here of course. There was a little sunlight here available and also some structure in the clouds. I want to know if its passable (borderline), but maybe its also too dark and if its workable if this version is not acceptable.

Biggest question here if this one is too similar compared to this one. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9427637.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

I deleted this one from the queue.The contrast is the biggest issue here of course. There was a little sunlight here available and also some structure in the clouds. I want to know if its passable (borderline), but maybe its also too dark and if its workable if this version is not acceptable.

Has issues with contrast and horizon. The former is not likely an easy fix.

Biggest question here if this one is too similar compared to this one.

Different enough for me, but that's subjective. Also somewhat dark.

[wkd001]

Hello, I would like a pre-screen on the following three images


The entire aircraft was not included in this shot, with a cut off stabilizer and a dark tail, due to sun breaking through a cloud. I'm curious how this crop is, and if it's not too soft and if there is enough contrast..
\
Wondering if this one is sharp enough and how contrast and exposure are.
Wondering if the contrast is not too harsh and if it's not too heathazed/oversharpened

if there are other issues i woulld like too know as well.

Thanks in advance.

[dlowwa]

Hello, I would like a pre-screen on the following three images


The entire aircraft was not included in this shot, with a cut off stabilizer and a dark tail, due to sun breaking through a cloud. I'm curious how this crop is, and if it's not too soft and if there is enough contrast..
\
Wondering if this one is sharp enough and how contrast and exposure are.
Wondering if the contrast is not too harsh and if it's not too heathazed/oversharpened

if there are other issues i woulld like too know as well.

Thanks in advance.

1. crop ok, but much too soft
2. also too soft
3. also soft. borderline (but acceptable for me) contrast