Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    After your answer, I remembered that already happened to me once. An appealed photo got rejected for another reasons, for what i appealed it.
    So I leave the ANA 77W for the moment.

    Today I got another reject for harsh contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12002331 ., which dazzles me a little
    This one got accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11427862 , was taken straigth after the rejected photo, and has for me the same contrast,
    Probably the reject is overexposed on top? (histogram has also a spike to the right side) Which could lead to the harsh contrast reject?

    Do I see this right or is there something else going on?
    Pretty similar, both borderline, imho. If you want to be optimistic, both should have been accepted; if you want to be pessimistic, both should have been rejected.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Might be fixable. Appealed images are re-screened, so any new issues might be added.
    Thanks Dana,

    After your answer, I remembered that already happened to me once. An appealed photo got rejected for another reasons, for what i appealed it.
    So I leave the ANA 77W for the moment.

    Today I got another reject for harsh contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12002331 ., which dazzles me a little
    This one got accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11427862 , was taken straigth after the rejected photo, and has for me the same contrast,
    Probably the reject is overexposed on top? (histogram has also a spike to the right side) Which could lead to the harsh contrast reject?

    Do I see this right or is there something else going on?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    OK . Thanks Dana,

    This gives me two questions

    If I would appeal the last photo (ANA 77W), can it be rejected on appeal for too harsh contrast (or underexposure)?

    Other question, are these photos even salvageable, given the lght conditions?
    - I want to notice , that with ANA , ths sun is completely in my back.
    - With the Virgin it is not, ( on around 90 degrees corner on my RH side) but on my side, but probably the angle is too bad for getting acceptable photos out of it in terms of acceptable contrast.

    Thanks in Advance
    Might be fixable. Appealed images are re-screened, so any new issues might be added.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Both dark/harshly contrasted. Don't really see any color issue.
    OK . Thanks Dana,

    This gives me two questions

    If I would appeal the last photo (ANA 77W), can it be rejected on appeal for too harsh contrast (or underexposure)?

    Other question, are these photos even salvageable, given the lght conditions?
    - I want to notice , that with ANA , ths sun is completely in my back.
    - With the Virgin it is not, ( on around 90 degrees corner on my RH side) but on my side, but probably the angle is too bad for getting acceptable photos out of it in terms of acceptable contrast.

    Thanks in Advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    As I thought.

    I've reworkes this one, would this one be better. Especially in terms of contrast.

    I also got this one rejected again, but this time for color.
    I am stunned by the reason as i really have no idea what's wrong with the color here. So any guidance would be appreciated .
    Both dark/harshly contrasted. Don't really see any color issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes.
    Thanks Dana,

    As I thought.

    I've reworkes this one, would this one be better. Especially in terms of contrast.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6871-2-2.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	362.7 KB
ID:	1195834


    I also got this one rejected again. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11976546 , but this time for color.
    I am stunned by the reason as i really have no idea what's wrong with the color here. So any guidance would be appreciated .

    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thank You Dana,

    It's too harsh I assume?
    And i also assume the same story goes up for this one?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast, not dark.
    Thank You Dana,

    It's too harsh I assume?
    And i also assume the same story goes up for this one?

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 6 million screened photos online!


    Thank you in Advance?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thank you again for your time Dana,

    Unfortunately I have a question a bout another reject,

    Is this one really too dark ,or does this also haven too harsh contrast. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11938701

    Because for me it's not too dark an the histogran does also not point into too dark for me

    Thank you in advance
    Contrast, not dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, contrast
    3. slight magenta cast. would have been ok for me
    Thank you again for your time Dana,

    Unfortunately I have a question a bout another reject,

    Is this one really too dark ,or does this also haven too harsh contrast. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11938701

    Because for me it's not too dark an the histogran does also not point into too dark for me

    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I would like to know if this one has a better chance of getting accepted.

    Further I would like to have a prescreen for this image, but I think contrast /heathaze./softness will make it a no go.


    Final question,

    I'm struggling with this reject,
    I think it looks too pink ,but I can't really correct it properly.The pink tone remains and i can't really get it while correcting color/ and/or white balance
    Any guidance would be appreciated
    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, contrast
    3. slight magenta cast. would have been ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast is too harsh.
    Ok Thanks Dana.
    I worked on another shot of it just a bit earlier .Tried to tone down the contrast but now it looks underexposed to me

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0722.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	364.8 KB
ID:	1194235
    I would like to know if this one has a better chance of getting accepted.

    Further I would like to have a prescreen for this image, but I think contrast /heathaze./softness will make it a no go.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6988.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	251.7 KB
ID:	1194234

    Final question,

    I'm struggling with this reject,https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11918472
    I think it looks too pink ,but I can't really correct it properly.The pink tone remains and i can't really get it while correcting color/ and/or white balance
    Any guidance would be appreciated

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello,

    I've received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11921430 , but I disagree on it.
    The histogram shows no underexposure to me ,Adding more exposure would blow out the nose I think
    I see almost everything from the aircraft, So I dio not really see the contrast issue also.
    Any guidance would be appreciated.
    Contrast is too harsh.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Hello,

    I've received this reject, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11921430 , but I disagree on it.
    The histogram shows no underexposure to me ,Adding more exposure would blow out the nose I think
    I see almost everything from the aircraft, So I dio not really see the contrast issue also.
    Any guidance would be appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    After some trying, the different image uploading works for me as well.


    Hello, I would like to have a prescreen on this image.
    Especially for ( too much) contrast and if the glare is not too disturbing.
    Dark/contrast.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X