Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked it and new version got accepted,

    Today, I've received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10890334
    Probably by a screener with very good eyes as I have no clue what's unlevel about it.Pole seems straight to me.

    Also I would like a prescreen for a couple of photo's which I'm unsure about.
    Rejected image needs CW rotation.

    1. dark/contrast
    2. horizon, borderline heat haze
    3. soft
    4. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Contrast is too harsh. Seems a bit soft to me, especially around the tail.
    Thanks Dana,

    I've reworked it and new version got accepted,

    Today, I've received this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10890334
    Probably by a screener with very good eyes as I have no clue what's unlevel about it.Pole seems straight to me.

    Also I would like a prescreen for a couple of photo's which I'm unsure about.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6556-2.JPG
Views:	16
Size:	352.1 KB
ID:	1156644
    Very unsure about the contrast here. Maybe horizon and softness also. I think this is a no-go

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0182.JPG
Views:	13
Size:	544.9 KB
ID:	1156645
    Unsure about softness. glare, expoure, contrast and horizon.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0006-2.JPG
Views:	13
Size:	509.3 KB
ID:	1156646
    Unsure about heathaze/softness, contrast and exposure.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0206.JPG
Views:	13
Size:	489.6 KB
ID:	1156647
    Unsure about softness and horizon here. I think it's too soft.

    Thanks in Advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks Dana,

    I've received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10846406 , but don't see the contrast issue here.
    Alsothe softness is debatable in my eyes, although I've found a few soft spots.
    So any guidance would be appreciated.

    Thanks in Advance
    Contrast is too harsh. Seems a bit soft to me, especially around the tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    There's that and spot to the left of the tail, according to the screener.



    1-3. contrast/dark, borderline soft, noisy
    4. contrast, color
    Thanks Dana,

    I've received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10846406 , but don't see the contrast issue here.
    Alsothe softness is debatable in my eyes, although I've found a few soft spots.
    So any guidance would be appreciated.

    Thanks in Advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello ,

    I've received this reject today for dirty.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10840294
    I would appreciate a second eye over it
    I've found a black dot between the two poles,(probably something like a bird i'didn't remove properly) so I assume it's rejected for that?
    Because I can't find more dirt to be honest..
    There's that and spot to the left of the tail, according to the screener.

    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Also I would like aprescreen on some phoot's which I'm unsure of
    1-3. contrast/dark, borderline soft, noisy
    4. contrast, color

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Hello ,

    I've received this reject today for dirty.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10840294
    I would appreciate a second eye over it
    I've found a black dot between the two poles,(probably something like a bird i'didn't remove properly) so I assume it's rejected for that?
    Because I can't find more dirt to be honest..

    Also I would like aprescreen on some phoot's which I'm unsure of.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9451-3.JPG
Views:	31
Size:	304.1 KB
ID:	1155124
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9492.JPG
Views:	26
Size:	262.9 KB
ID:	1155125
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9543-2.JPG
Views:	27
Size:	282.4 KB
ID:	1155126
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6811-2.JPG
Views:	26
Size:	416.2 KB
ID:	1155127
    For all photos i see potential issues with contrast, sharpening and exposure.
    There were all taken (except the fourth) with the sun peeling through the clouds not that long before sunset.

    Thnaks in advance


    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Hello,

    I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10676295 , but I'm a little confused about the color part in the reject.
    I've only added some contrast, but didn't add any saturation or clarity.
    For surance I've made a new edit, where I've toned down the contrast a bit, lowered the white balance a bit also, and tried to adress the horizon issue.

    I'm curious If this version adresses the mentioned issues and if the sharpness is acceptable here.

    I also have another prescreen request.

    I'm very curious if this one is sharp enough ( i think it's not ) if there are no weird artefacts here and if there might be any other issues I might have missed

    Thanks in advance.
    Yellow/green tint on the rejected image. Don't see a huge difference with the newer version. Other image is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Hello,

    I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10676295 , but I'm a little confused about the color part in the reject.
    I've only added some contrast, but didn't add any saturation or clarity.
    For surance I've made a new edit, where I've toned down the contrast a bit, lowered the white balance a bit also, and tried to adress the horizon issue.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6215-3.JPG
Views:	52
Size:	465.4 KB
ID:	1151020
    I'm curious If this version adresses the mentioned issues and if the sharpness is acceptable here.

    I also have another prescreen request.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5940.JPG
Views:	41
Size:	677.8 KB
ID:	1151021
    I'm very curious if this one is sharp enough ( i think it's not ) if there are no weird artefacts here and if there might be any other issues I might have missed

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thnaks a lot for that Dana,
    I will refrain from further attempts on this one.
    But another question,
    Does this photo also have artefacts/ weird shadows? As I can't see something with the naked eye..

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6136-2.JPG
Views:	64
Size:	568.8 KB
ID:	1150166

    And another question?

    Is this one really overexposed? Or is this too harsh contrast?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10644008

    If I lower the exposure I'm afraid it will get too dark or bad contrast also.
    I will also double check the serial number /CN as I'm little dazed about that, but apparently it wasn't right.

    Thanks in advance.
    1. soft, otherwise ok for me
    2. contrast is too harsh

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes, almost certainly. It's so strong I can see it in the thumbnail.
    Thnaks a lot for that Dana,
    I will refrain from further attempts on this one.
    But another question,
    Does this photo also have artefacts/ weird shadows? As I can't see something with the naked eye..

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6136-2.JPG
Views:	64
Size:	568.8 KB
ID:	1150166

    And another question?

    Is this one really overexposed? Or is this too harsh contrast?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10644008

    If I lower the exposure I'm afraid it will get too dark or bad contrast also.
    I will also double check the serial number /CN as I'm little dazed about that, but apparently it wasn't right.

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    The dark spots on top are from a wire of the fence. I had no opportunity to shoot above it.
    Could this cause those artifacts/ weird shadows during editing?
    I want to know as I have a similar case from another aircraft waiting for final editing now.
    Yes, almost certainly. It's so strong I can see it in the thumbnail.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1149924]

    If you were shooting through a fence, that's likely what was mistaken for compression.

    Thanks for that Dana,
    As I can;t upload the original due to the size limitiations I made a quick re-edit of it, with the upper part of the original included.
    Not for prescreeen (it's useless I Know), but only for probably clearing this up for me.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6199-2-2.JPG
Views:	74
Size:	777.8 KB
ID:	1149985


    The dark spots on top are from a wire of the fence. I had no opportunity to shoot above it.
    Could this cause those artifacts/ weird shadows during editing?
    I want to know as I have a similar case from another aircraft waiting for final editing now.

    Thanks in Advance,



    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10630715 and especially the arifats are striking me.
    I've only added some contrast and a bit of saturation and saved twice on the highest quality
    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1668626251.jpg
    I have really no idea how those white lines got there.
    I was shooting between the wires of a fence and the wires got some sharp ends at several points.
    If you were shooting through a fence, that's likely what was mistaken for compression.

    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    At second I would like prescrreen on some photos.
    1. soft, contrast horizon
    2. soft, contrast, borderline overprocessed
    3. soft

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1-3. borderline soft (ok for me)
    4-5. soft

    Contrast a bit harsh on some of them, but ok for me.
    Thanks for that Dana,

    I've queued the first two after some slight rework.

    I've received this reject lately https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10630715 and especially the arifats are striking me.
    I've only added some contrast and a bit of saturation and saved twice on the highest quality
    https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1668626251.jpg
    I have really no idea how those white lines got there.
    I was shooting between the wires of a fence and the wires got some sharp ends at several points.
    Maybe it's something with the sun coming from the LH side here.
    At second step I've only added (apparently too much) sharpening and saved again on highest quality

    At second I would like prescrreen on some photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5708.JPG
Views:	75
Size:	428.6 KB
ID:	1149878
    Potential issues are sharpness, horizon, glare, contrast, processing.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5680.JPG
Views:	58
Size:	384.0 KB
ID:	1149879 I think it's too soft and the is some kind of glare/reflection on the LH-side of the photo. (taken from the terminal.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6274.JPG
Views:	59
Size:	441.6 KB
ID:	1149880 Another original as the one from the previous batch.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I went to a new spot for me and got some photos which make me unsure and I would like a prescreen on these.
    1-3. borderline soft (ok for me)
    4-5. soft

    Contrast a bit harsh on some of them, but ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X