If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I aready didn't want to go on with #5, maybe I'll return later with another try of #4.
I''ll try different ones.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19026[/ATTACH] Pulled a wrong version into this thread, my apologies.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19027[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19028[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19029[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]19030[/ATTACH]
Thank you in Advance,
Best Regards,
Wilko
1. borderline contrast
2-4 ok
5. borderline dark/contrast
#1,#3 and #5 will remain personal.
Will double check the horizon of #2 before uploading.
Most important question to me. Could #4 be made acceptable (Borderline). It has some flaws of sunlight on the aircraft.
I already made a rought edit on it.(went too far one the color apparently.)
Do have another one with some sunlight, but that one, suffers the same issues as #5.
Thank you in Advance.
Best Regards,
Wilko
I sincerely doubt, that the last two can be made acceptable.
#1,#3 and #5 will remain personal.
Will double check the horizon of #2 before uploading.
Most important question to me. Could #4 be made acceptable (Borderline). It has some flaws of sunlight on the aircraft.
I already made a rought edit on it.(went too far one the color apparently.)
Do have another one with some sunlight, but that one, suffers the same issues as #5.
Great Dana,
Brought only #1 to the queue for this momentand it got accepted.
After absence here due to various reasons I want to bring five new ones for pre-screen.
All nasty contrast but hoping the the best for #4 and #5 as they were taken during my holiday in South Africa when I had short time to shoot some aircraft unfortunately in dull conditions. Thinking myself #4 is better as #5..
Again, borderline softness on some, but probably passable. Third one needs a tighter crop.
Great Dana,
Brought only #1 to the queue for this momentand it got accepted.
After absence here due to various reasons I want to bring five new ones for pre-screen.
All nasty contrast but hoping the the best for #4 and #5 as they were taken during my holiday in South Africa when I had short time to shoot some aircraft unfortunately in dull conditions. Thinking myself #4 is better as #5..
Trying my luck with 1,3 and 4 with slight modifications.
Five new ones.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18436[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18437[/ATTACH] Think it's too soft, maybe even blurry.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18438[/ATTACH] Not sure about sharpness here also, and maybe a little obstructed.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18439[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18440[/ATTACH]
Thank you in Advance.
Best regards,
Wilko
Again, borderline softness on some, but probably passable. Third one needs a tighter crop.
Thanks Gerardo,
However, after struggling too much with shadows exposure, blacks and contrast. i decided to let go.
Can't get a result what it satisfying me.
So five other ones, which defenitely need pre-screen.
Try to reduce exposure a bit and add more contrast. That will certainly correct exposure, maybe even softness. If not, add some unsharp masking, just a tad and it should be acceptable.
Thanks Gerardo,
However, after struggling too much with shadows exposure, blacks and contrast. i decided to let go.
Can't get a result what it satisfying me.
So five other ones, which defenitely need pre-screen.
However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.
Best Regards,
Wilko
Cropping is OK for me.
Try to reduce exposure a bit and add more contrast. That will certainly correct exposure, maybe even softness. If not, add some unsharp masking, just a tad and it should be acceptable.
However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: