If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.
Best Regards,
Wilko
Cropping is OK for me.
Try to reduce exposure a bit and add more contrast. That will certainly correct exposure, maybe even softness. If not, add some unsharp masking, just a tad and it should be acceptable.
However, received this reject today. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6751202
reject reasons were overexposed, soft, and part of aircraft cut off
And I don't know exactly which way to go with.
Overexposure could be, although the light was very rough and it was in almost midday and very warm
Tried lowering the whites and the exposure also, but with both actions not really satisfied as also the histgram will shows gaps on the right side with both these actions
Softness is debatable in my opinion, but maybe the nose parts are too soft, the wing, and windows were not.
As of the aircraft cut off, the complete aircraft was not in the original RAW file, so I had to go for a sort of crop like I chose.
Should I've done something different?
If not fixable, I do have a RAW file some seconds later, but with also NOT the complete aircraft included.
As it was a special livery and do want to include it, I ask for help.
As the whole wing was not included in the original file, I made a tighter crop closer to the engine
This is it right now,
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17790[/ATTACH]
And three new ones.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17791[/ATTACH]. Thinking it's too soft..
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17792[/ATTACH] Crop, centering.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17793[/ATTACH] Color cast. Can't point out what exactly.
Thank you in Advance.
Best Regards,
Wilko
I think #3 needs a little CCW. The rest should be ok.
Especially the crops and on the EK also the centering.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17749[/ATTACH]
I really like his shot, but I don't know what to do with it. It's by far not enough for an overview to me,
so i want to upload the first aircraft (old livery) But that one is too low in frame , normally, or doesn't that count it case.
Curious about answers.
Thank you in Advance.
Best Regards,
Wilko
1. ok
2. either crop tighter or wider on left to include whole wing
3. ok
4. needs a little CCW rotation
I think the first one might be rejected for obstruction (fence in front of the right main landing gear), the third looks borderline contrast but otherwise okay.
The rest I don't see a problem with them. They should easily go through.
Thank you Pta Aviation.
Could someone explain to me, what the contrast issue is with the EK A380?
And four new ones from a visit to Dusseldorf last weekend.
Contrast and exposure???
Especially the crops and on the EK also the centering.
I really like his shot, but I don't know what to do with it. It's by far not enough for an overview to me,
so i want to upload the first aircraft (old livery) But that one is too low in frame , normally, or doesn't that count it case.
Main possible issues for me are heathaze and crop on the 3rd. Also if especially 4 and 5 are special scheme (5 I'm almost sure)
Thank you in Advance.
Best Regards,
Wilko
I think the first one might be rejected for obstruction (fence in front of the right main landing gear), the third looks borderline contrast but otherwise okay.
The rest I don't see a problem with them. They should easily go through.
1,2 and 4 are in the queue after some practice with curves to hopefully remove the flatness.
Accidentally uploaded the QR A380 at 1280, here it is at 1600.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17344[/ATTACH]
Another at 1600 pix.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17345[/ATTACH]
One at 1400 pix.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17346[/ATTACH]
And two at 1280.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17347[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17348[/ATTACH] ( Thinking something is very wrong with this one (also the SuneExpress) due to the size of the file.Could someone point me to an idea. Maybe overedit, or something else)
Thank you in Advance.
Best Regards,
Wilko
Last one is a bit dark, but quality otherwise looks acceptable on all of them.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: