Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wkd001- Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Thanks a lot again Dana,

    I've brought modified versions in terms of sharpness to the queue

    Yesterday I've received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8307210

    I would like to receive some extra explanation about it.
    Soft I could imagine as I see some soft areas , but hard lines are visible
    Color I don't really understand, maybe a little too oversaturated (orange/green)

    Thanks in advance for your time.

    Best Regards.
    The rejection for colour is a bit harsh IMO. A wee bit of sharpening and it is good to go. You can quote me in your re-upload, if you want.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Both are a bit soft.
    Thanks a lot again Dana,

    I've brought modified versions in terms of sharpness to the queue

    Yesterday I've received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8307210

    I would like to receive some extra explanation about it.
    Soft I could imagine as I see some soft areas , but hard lines are visible
    Color I don't really understand, maybe a little too oversaturated (orange/green)

    Thanks in advance for your time.

    Best Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    OK Thanks Dana.

    I would like a prescreen on these two photos
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5037.JPG
Views:	21
Size:	372.3 KB
ID:	1095365

    Would this one be worser with contrast compared to previous post???. Aircraft was turning a little to right, so it took a little more sun. Sorry for being annoying maybe, But I want to figure this out as much as possible.

    I'm also unsure about this photo.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4936.JPG
Views:	18
Size:	388.0 KB
ID:	1095366 There was a dustspot partially at the left wing. I had to remove it on a different way as usual. i want to know if it's done well or If i could receive something like a bad processing reject for it.
    I'm also unsure about the contrast, compression and the color on this one.

    Thanks in advance.
    Both are a bit soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    OK Thanks Dana.

    I would like a prescreen on these two photos
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5037.JPG
Views:	21
Size:	372.3 KB
ID:	1095365

    Would this one be worser with contrast compared to previous post???. Aircraft was turning a little to right, so it took a little more sun. Sorry for being annoying maybe, But I want to figure this out as much as possible.

    I'm also unsure about this photo.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4936.JPG
Views:	18
Size:	388.0 KB
ID:	1095366 There was a dustspot partially at the left wing. I had to remove it on a different way as usual. i want to know if it's done well or If i could receive something like a bad processing reject for it.
    I'm also unsure about the contrast, compression and the color on this one.

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    Now I would like a prescreen on only this photo.
    Yes, issues with contrast/darkness due to the angle of the light. Also quite soft.

    Originally posted by oleksandr_sm View Post

    I would add a bit sharp and contrast
    Adding contrast will only make it worse, as the shadows are already too strong.

    Leave a comment:


  • oleksandr_sm
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Now I would like a prescreen on only this photo. Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5032-2.JPG
Views:	34
Size:	349.2 KB
ID:	1094641 I'm (again) struggling with the contrast and exposure on this one. Is there something fixable to get out of this, as the sun is almost on the nose of the aircraft.
    Rest should be OK I guess, unless I missed something by accident of course.

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards
    I would add a bit sharp and contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1094303]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    1. dark, overprocessed
    2. contrast, overprocessed
    3. centering, overprocessed, dirty
    4. borderline soft
    5. soft, contrast

    If the halos are present on the original jpegs of the first three, that is not fixable.
    OK thanks a lot Dana,
    Maybe I''ll only try the fourth one once.

    Now I would like a prescreen on only this photo. Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5032-2.JPG
Views:	34
Size:	349.2 KB
ID:	1094641 I'm (again) struggling with the contrast and exposure on this one. Is there something fixable to get out of this, as the sun is almost on the nose of the aircraft.
    Rest should be OK I guess, unless I missed something by accident of course.

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1094267]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Thanks a lot Dana, I've tried my luck with the second.

    Now I would like a prescreen om some old stuff.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6519.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	248.2 KB
ID:	1094268Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6458.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	359.2 KB
ID:	1094269Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6981.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	636.7 KB
ID:	1094270Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0502.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	426.4 KB
ID:	1094271Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9497.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	340.7 KB
ID:	1094272 These are all old images without RAW-files. I've tried to sort the most things out. However If there are issues with contrast, centering ,sharpness , horizon and compression. i would like to know. Even more important for me if they could be fixable, because I have only JPEG-from these.

    Thanks in advance.
    1. dark, overprocessed
    2. contrast, overprocessed
    3. centering, overprocessed, dirty
    4. borderline soft
    5. soft, contrast

    If the halos are present on the original jpegs of the first three, that is not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1092893]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    1. yes, likely a contrast rejection
    2. nothing technically wrong with the crop, but personally don't find it too aesthetically pleasing
    3. yes soft (whole aircraft), and also a bit noisy
    Thanks a lot Dana, I've tried my luck with the second.

    Now I would like a prescreen om some old stuff.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6519.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	248.2 KB
ID:	1094268Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6458.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	359.2 KB
ID:	1094269Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6981.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	636.7 KB
ID:	1094270Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0502.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	426.4 KB
ID:	1094271Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9497.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	340.7 KB
ID:	1094272 These are all old images without RAW-files. I've tried to sort the most things out. However If there are issues with contrast, centering ,sharpness , horizon and compression. i would like to know. Even more important for me if they could be fixable, because I have only JPEG-from these.

    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1092871]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Now i would like a prescreen on the following photos
    1. yes, likely a contrast rejection
    2. nothing technically wrong with the crop, but personally don't find it too aesthetically pleasing
    3. yes soft (whole aircraft), and also a bit noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1092474]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    1. ok
    2. borderline contrast
    3. dark
    Thanks a lot Dana, I've only queued the first thus far and the third can serve other targets.

    Now i would like a prescreen on the following photos

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4609.JPG
Views:	45
Size:	363.4 KB
ID:	1092872Is this one too backlit/dark/ bad contrast??

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4156.JPG
Views:	35
Size:	461.1 KB
ID:	1092873 Again not the entire aicraft on the original as it took off far quicker as I expected. So again, is this crop OK? Is the crop too tight on the wing? Entire wing is included.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4146.JPG
Views:	34
Size:	619.5 KB
ID:	1092874 Same story as second. But here also unsure on softness especially around the nosegear.

    Thanks in Advance.

    Best Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1092462]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Thanks Dana, I've queued it.

    I have two questions at the moment

    First of all of this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8206198. I've found the dust spot, but I'm unsure if i fixed it properly in the attached re-edit.
    As it only appeared in my pre-final edit and i rmoved it working into the final edit here.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4036-2.JPG
Views:	60
Size:	366.3 KB
ID:	1092463

    At second i would like a prescreen on these two photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3678.JPG
Views:	41
Size:	197.3 KB
ID:	1092464
    A very early morning shot about half an hour after sunrise. Sun head on the aircraft, but pretty heavy crop, So no idea if it has any chance, An extra view would be appreciated.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4444-2.JPG
Views:	42
Size:	498.7 KB
ID:	1092465
    Not great contrast I know, but just exactly in sunset. Extra eye on the sharpening would also be appreciated,although I could of course always re-edit on a smaller size.

    Thanks in advance.

    1. ok
    2. borderline contrast
    3. dark

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1091817]
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post

    Exposure looks acceptable to me.
    Thanks Dana, I've queued it.

    I have two questions at the moment

    First of all of this reject. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8206198. I've found the dust spot, but I'm unsure if i fixed it properly in the attached re-edit.
    As it only appeared in my pre-final edit and i rmoved it working into the final edit here.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4036-2.JPG
Views:	60
Size:	366.3 KB
ID:	1092463

    At second i would like a prescreen on these two photos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3678.JPG
Views:	41
Size:	197.3 KB
ID:	1092464
    A very early morning shot about half an hour after sunrise. Sun head on the aircraft, but pretty heavy crop, So no idea if it has any chance, An extra view would be appreciated.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4444-2.JPG
Views:	42
Size:	498.7 KB
ID:	1092465
    Not great contrast I know, but just exactly in sunset. Extra eye on the sharpening would also be appreciated,although I could of course always re-edit on a smaller size.

    Thanks in advance.


    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=wkd001;n1091792]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Check the histogram. Big gap on right.

    Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my question,
    I found the gap on the right side of the histogram.
    Problem for me is the sun reflecting in the nose, which leads to a highlight warning in the histogram of my lightroom.
    But maybe I should ignore that in the future.
    So I bring now a re-edit of this sot with increased exposure,
    I'm curious if it's good know, or if I still have to change things. Also to learn for myself in cases like these
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3992-2.JPG
Views:	71
Size:	883.9 KB
ID:	1091793
    Thanks in advance
    Exposure looks acceptable to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1091739]

    Check the histogram. Big gap on right.

    Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my question,
    I found the gap on the right side of the histogram.
    Problem for me is the sun reflecting in the nose, which leads to a highlight warning in the histogram of my lightroom.
    But maybe I should ignore that in the future.
    So I bring now a re-edit of this sot with increased exposure,
    I'm curious if it's good know, or if I still have to change things. Also to learn for myself in cases like these
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3992-2.JPG
Views:	71
Size:	883.9 KB
ID:	1091793
    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X