Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Olivier Landes. editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    For correction please

    1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]12746[/ATTACH]

    and these

    3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]12749[/ATTACH]

    4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]12750[/ATTACH]

    see you soon
    Quality looks ok on all, though #2 is problematic since it doesn't really feature either aircraft prominently.

    Comment


    • I submitted this photo here and seemed ok by B772ADL, I proposed it once and found myself rejected. I made the adjustments. She is rejected again. I do not understand!!!!

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6284826

      and these for correction

      Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06830.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	830.3 KB
ID:	1021599

      thanks in advance

      Olivier

      Comment


      • Hello JP crew, congratulation for the queue.

        Please correction for my last message.

        Thank you

        Comment


        • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
          I submitted this photo here and seemed ok by B772ADL, I proposed it once and found myself rejected. I made the adjustments. She is rejected again. I do not understand!!!!

          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6284826
          I guess whoever screened the images disagreed with the advice you were given.

          Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
          and these for correction

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]12848[/ATTACH]
          Looks passable to me.

          Comment


          • Thank you Dana for your answer.


            I reload the norvegian, we'll see and this one, what do you think, I reworked after his rejection.

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6296948

            after

            Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06679.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	936.6 KB
ID:	1021663

            Once again thank you for the advice provided

            Comment


            • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
              Thank you Dana for your answer.


              I reload the norvegian, we'll see and this one, what do you think, I reworked after his rejection.

              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6296948

              after

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]12938[/ATTACH]

              Once again thank you for the advice provided
              Looks ok to me.

              Comment


              • Hello, after a course stay at the hospital, I come back proposed some pictures for correction

                1 Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06655.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	710.9 KB
ID:	1021739

                2 Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06714.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	753.7 KB
ID:	1021740

                3 Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06736.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.8 KB
ID:	1021741

                4 Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06749.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	630.0 KB
ID:	1021742

                5 Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06788.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	785.4 KB
ID:	1021743

                Good day and see you soon

                Olivier

                Comment


                • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                  Hello, after a course stay at the hospital, I come back proposed some pictures for correction

                  1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13023[/ATTACH]

                  2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13024[/ATTACH]

                  3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13025[/ATTACH]

                  4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13026[/ATTACH]

                  5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]13027[/ATTACH]

                  Good day and see you soon

                  Olivier
                  Other than dust spots, they look ok.

                  Comment


                  • Merci Dana,

                    I just call on this picture because I do not understand some screener.
                    I force myself to respect the guideline, to submit my doubts here to avoid saturating the queue with rejectable photos
                    This photo was rejected while it seemed OK. Check by Alex and Dana.

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6304316

                    Olivier

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                      Merci Dana,

                      I just call on this picture because I do not understand some screener.
                      I force myself to respect the guideline, to submit my doubts here to avoid saturating the queue with rejectable photos
                      This photo was rejected while it seemed OK. Check by Alex and Dana.

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6304316

                      Olivier
                      Hey Olivier!

                      Every Screener have various opinions, but you can try to appeal the photo with a friendly reference to your pre-screening thread and a positive result from a "senior-screener".
                      Not sure if this works, but without risk you can´t get a result.

                      Have a nice weekend!
                      Best Regards from Germany,
                      Julian S.​

                      Comment


                      • No it does not work and today was accepted a photo with a lot of grain noise blur, ok the photo date of 1998 but still

                        Thank Julian

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                          Merci Dana,

                          I just call on this picture because I do not understand some screener.
                          I force myself to respect the guideline, to submit my doubts here to avoid saturating the queue with rejectable photos
                          This photo was rejected while it seemed OK. Check by Alex and Dana.

                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6304316

                          Olivier
                          I've had a discussion with the other senior screeners, and we've agreed the obstruction rejection was in error. However, since the cut off/crop rejection is a subjective one (obviously I don't agree ), the rejection will stand.

                          Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                          No it does not work and today was accepted a photo with a lot of grain noise blur, ok the photo date of 1998 but still
                          Standards for images before ~ 2004 are significantly lower. If you have images from 1998 but hesitate to upload them due to quality issues, rest assured we will be much more lenient, so please upload them!

                          Comment


                          • Thank you Dana, it's very nice. I'm going to rest because I just had surgery and sorry for my disappointment

                            Comment


                            • Hello,
                              Thanks again, so now if I put these two photos back in the queue, will it be good?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	05112017-DSC05588.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	965.9 KB
ID:	1021770

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	03012018-DSC06830.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	829.2 KB
ID:	1021771

                              Good day

                              Olivier

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
                                Hello,
                                Thanks again, so now if I put these two photos back in the queue, will it be good?

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13058[/ATTACH]

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]13059[/ATTACH]

                                Good day

                                Olivier
                                I don't see any difference between these and the rejected versions..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X