oups sorry sorry sorry!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Olivier Landes. editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Hello JP Crew,
what is the difference between these two photos?
4X-EDA. Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
and these
here we must refer to the gradients. what is it?
Are these two pictures better?
Olivier
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostHello JP Crew,
what is the difference between these two photos?
4X-EDA. Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
and these
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14216[/ATTACH] here we must refer to the gradients. what is it?
Are these two pictures better?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14217[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14218[/ATTACH]
Olivier
Comment
-
Thank you Dana for your answer. The first was rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6411554
But there is even better
Photo rejected february 20 2018 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6386909
I have modified and rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413011
I am tired of these very subjective decisions
To understand nothing, I just cropped after the first rejection. She was in addition undersharpened and now it's the opposite while I reassigned them just a little bit.
Do you agree between screener. Some "rotten" photos are accepted, there we make efforts by going on the forum to end up with a refusal. Look in my list of refusals you have the same two photos except one is cropped. What is the point of you screenerd having photos that come back to be canceled? Sorry for my vehemence.
Olivier
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostThank you Dana for your answer. The first was rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6411554
But there is even better
Photo rejected february 20 2018 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6386909
I have modified and rejected today https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6413011
I am tired of these very subjective decisions
To understand nothing, I just cropped after the first rejection. She was in addition undersharpened and now it's the opposite while I reassigned them just a little bit.
Do you agree between screener. Some "rotten" photos are accepted, there we make efforts by going on the forum to end up with a refusal. Look in my list of refusals you have the same two photos except one is cropped. What is the point of you screenerd having photos that come back to be canceled? Sorry for my vehemence.
Olivier
the Air Europa is very strong leaning to the right. This looks very clumsy and unrealistic as those approaches are usual from planes like the AN12 or Transall.
The first ANA is too high in frame and the clipped tail looks bad. The second shot is good centered, but, you can see very strong jaggies which leads to the oversharpened rejection.
Mostly you don´t have to add tons of sharpening - less is sometimes more!
Hope this helps, have a nice day!Last edited by Julian S.; 2018-03-06, 17:39.Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostHello Jp team,
Today with of funny color on LFPG, Can be guided to me on these photos, please.
1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]10886[/ATTACH]
2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]10887[/ATTACH]
3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]10888[/ATTACH]
4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]10889[/ATTACH] or 5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]10892[/ATTACH]
Thank you
Olivier
1. lacks contrast
2. bad cropping
3. needs a little CCW rotation
4. soft and also blurry
5. soft, blurry, contrast
Best Regards,
Vinicius Cruvinel
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostFor the ANA at first rejection, why am I told that it is undersharpened. Especially since I hardly touch the sharpening
For Europa, for Dana is OK .
We do not know which way to dance !!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostHello to all and JP Crew,
New pictures for correction please
1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]14399[/ATTACH]
2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]14400[/ATTACH]
3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]14401[/ATTACH]
4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]14402[/ATTACH]
5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]14403[/ATTACH]
Thank you
Olivier
2. dirty
3-4 similar
5. dirty, soft, horizon
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostBest Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
Comment
Comment