Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Olivier Landes. editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Thank you for you answer Dana,

    After correction, it's better?
    1. editing halos still visible
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft/blurry. Don't think this one is fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Thank you for you answer Dana,

    After correction, it's better?

    1
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03487.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	572.3 KB
ID:	1090492Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03285.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	489.1 KB
ID:	1090491

    3Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03250.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	596.0 KB
ID:	1090490

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Hello Dana, Hello JP Crew,

    Can you enlighten me on these rejections that I find quite severe.
    It will improve me because I have no explanation of the screener, Too bad !!!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8146117 it's natural light! no modified
    There are editing halos around the aircraft. Those are not caused by natural effects, only in-camera or post-processing.

    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Not sure shouting about it will make anyone provide advice to you. In any case, both are clearly not 'hard', especially the MEA. The tail is nearly blurry if you care to check again.

    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8149420 no worries about this rejection that I understand, but which category should I validate
    Night Shot is missing.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Hello Dana, Hello JP Crew,

    Can you enlighten me on these rejections that I find quite severe.
    It will improve me because I have no explanation of the screener, Too bad !!!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8146117 it's natural light! no modified

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8149324 soft??? it's hard!!!!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8149370 soft??? it's hard!!!!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8149420 no worries about this rejection that I understand, but which category should I validate

    Thank you for your advice

    Olivier

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Thank you Dana for giving me the link to my topic.
    And for your advice
    OlivierClick image for larger version

Name:	DSC03068.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	591.1 KB
ID:	1089750
    This would unfortunately be rejected for soft, color, and contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Thank you Dana for giving me the link to my topic.
    And for your advice
    OlivierClick image for larger version

Name:	DSC03068.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	591.1 KB
ID:	1089750

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02547.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	729.7 KB
ID:	1081393Hello JP Crew,

    I have a doubt about the landing gear, to know if it is not too cut

    Olivier
    Shouldn't be a problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02547.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	729.7 KB
ID:	1081393Hello JP Crew,

    I have a doubt about the landing gear, to know if it is not too cut

    Olivier

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Hello JP crew, for correction please

    1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29485[/ATTACH]
    Blurry. Cannot be corrected.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Hello JP crew, for correction please

    1 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01832.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.1 KB
ID:	1043482

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Oups sorry Dana!!!
    Images all have issues with poor contrast, so maybe better to pass on them anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Merci Alex,

    1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29039[/ATTACH]

    2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29040[/ATTACH]

    3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29041[/ATTACH]

    4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29042[/ATTACH]

    5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29043[/ATTACH]

    See you soon

    Olivier
    Oups sorry Dana!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by olandes269 View Post
    Merci Alex,

    1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29039[/ATTACH]

    2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29040[/ATTACH]

    3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29041[/ATTACH]

    4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29042[/ATTACH]

    5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]29043[/ATTACH]

    See you soon

    Olivier
    Hi, please read here when you get a chance, especially #3:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Merci Alex,

    1 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01762.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.25 MB
ID:	1043108

    2 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01765.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1043109

    3 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01794.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1043110

    4 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01796.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1043111

    5 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01798.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1043112

    See you soon

    Olivier

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    1) borderline contrast
    2) ok
    3) nice picture !!
    4) borderline contrast but ok for me
    5) okay

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X