Originally posted by 777MAN
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
777MAN - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Hi, Appreciate a second opinion on these pls? I had a 4th rejection which I can see the reason. The dark issues seem to be a an issue when I get into late afternoon light. Understand the guidelines and the need to 'push' the light for acceptance, seems that in some instances if this is done it kills the ambience.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6551886 (Dark / Underexposed
Undersharpened (Soft)
Too much or too little contrast)
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6549694. (Dark / Underexposed
Undersharpened (Soft))
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6548821 (Undersharpened (Soft))
Comment
-
Originally posted by olandes269 View PostHello,
I'm not screener.
Your first two pictures are at sunset or sunrise. it gives a weak yellow light. Recently I also had an identical rejection. Dana or Alex told me to check "night photo".
In all three photos, the nose is slightly soft and will require more sharpening.
Olivier
thanks -T
Comment
-
Originally posted by 777MAN View PostHi, Appreciate a second opinion on these pls? I had a 4th rejection which I can see the reason. The dark issues seem to be a an issue when I get into late afternoon light. Understand the guidelines and the need to 'push' the light for acceptance, seems that in some instances if this is done it kills the ambience.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6551886 (Dark / Underexposed
Undersharpened (Soft)
Too much or too little contrast)
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6549694. (Dark / Underexposed
Undersharpened (Soft))
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6548821 (Undersharpened (Soft))
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostFirst and second are a bit dark, but really just need more contrast imho. Looking at the images, I'm going to guess the originals were relatively soft (shot at distance?), and you've applied a fair amount of sharpening, but some areas are still noticeably soft - especially the titles on the first two. I actually think the last is the best, and possibly even acceptable as it is, but I'm obviously not the one who screened it
All three at 400mm, going back to the originals on your comments I now see on 1 and 2 possible air quality issues. Agree on the the last, I just appealed at Dubai shot and accepted. Maybe its a mix of conditions ? I might appeal the third however, one in 24hrs is a stretch at times. thanks again for the feedback just what I was looking for T
Comment
-
Got 'Under sharpened' on this one. Its my usual sharpening, looking at it I think maybe the harsh sun hitting the nose cone / cockpit might be an issue and maybe some of the reg/engine lettering. TBH kinda struggling feeling its not that bad, sure another pass is possible. Is it worth an appeal, don't want to waste screening time tho. Cheers T
Comment
-
Originally posted by 777MAN View PostGot 'Under sharpened' on this one. Its my usual sharpening, looking at it I think maybe the harsh sun hitting the nose cone / cockpit might be an issue and maybe some of the reg/engine lettering. TBH kinda struggling feeling its not that bad, sure another pass is possible. Is it worth an appeal, don't want to waste screening time tho. Cheers T
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6588523
Comment
-
Originally posted by 777MAN View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]16589[/ATTACH]
Is this crop acceptable? Looking to showcase the engine and mount to wing with this angle.
T
Comment
Comment