Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Huy Do - Editting advices

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Can I get pre-screen on these, please? Thank you in advance!
    1.Click image for larger version

Name:	15-51181200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	975.9 KB
ID:	1033957
    2.Click image for larger version

Name:	13-50731200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	607.2 KB
ID:	1033958
    3.Click image for larger version

Name:	1668971200.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	549.6 KB
ID:	1033959
    4.Click image for larger version

Name:	A21-1812001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	488.5 KB
ID:	1033960
    5.Click image for larger version

Name:	16-57971200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	330.8 KB
ID:	1033961

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by huytrando View Post
      Can I get pre-screen on these, please? Thank you in advance!
      1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23019[/ATTACH]
      2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23020[/ATTACH]
      3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23021[/ATTACH]
      4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23022[/ATTACH]
      5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23023[/ATTACH]
      1. blurry, compression
      2. soft/blurry
      3. soft, blurry, contrast
      4. ok
      5. blurry, contrast

      Comment


      • #63
        Can I get pre-screen on these pics? Thank you in advance!
        1. Click image for larger version

Name:	HL80411200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	588.7 KB
ID:	1034961
        2. Click image for larger version

Name:	N943JT1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	646.3 KB
ID:	1034962
        3. Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EDF1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	723.4 KB
ID:	1034963
        4. Click image for larger version

Name:	B-52701200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	571.2 KB
ID:	1034964
        5. Click image for larger version

Name:	02-11591200.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	503.7 KB
ID:	1034965

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by huytrando View Post
          Can I get pre-screen on these pics? Thank you in advance!
          1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24271[/ATTACH]
          2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24272[/ATTACH]
          3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24273[/ATTACH]
          4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24274[/ATTACH]
          5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24275[/ATTACH]
          1-2 borderline soft/compression in sky
          3. soft/blurry
          4-5 soft, contrast

          Comment


          • #65
            Hello, I was wondering if these shots would be considered obstruction, and whether the last one should be upload as DQ-TFL reg? Best Regards.
            1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-HAW1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	883.7 KB
ID:	1035534
            2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-HAV1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	796.9 KB
ID:	1035535
            3. Click image for larger version

Name:	DQ-TFL1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	807.3 KB
ID:	1035536

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by huytrando View Post
              Hello, I was wondering if these shots would be considered obstruction, and whether the last one should be upload as DQ-TFL reg? Best Regards.
              1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24957[/ATTACH]
              2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24958[/ATTACH]
              3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24959[/ATTACH]
              Yes, obstruction on the first two; use DQ-TFL on the third unless you have a wider crop, in which case Airport Overview - Ramp would be better.

              Comment


              • #67
                Would these two belows gonna be rejected for "similar", considering I already uploaded this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9332633
                1. Click image for larger version

Name:	KBFI12005.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1039919
                2. Click image for larger version

Name:	KBFI12004.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.28 MB
ID:	1039920
                And would these be considered "backlit"?
                3. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-RZA1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	675.2 KB
ID:	1039921
                4. Click image for larger version

Name:	TF-ICC1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	724.6 KB
ID:	1039922
                5. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AMAA1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	743.6 KB
ID:	1039923
                Thank you in advance!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by huytrando View Post
                  Would these two belows gonna be rejected for "similar", considering I already uploaded this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9332633
                  1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25285[/ATTACH]
                  2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25286[/ATTACH]
                  And would these be considered "backlit"?
                  3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25287[/ATTACH]
                  4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25288[/ATTACH]
                  5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25289[/ATTACH]
                  Thank you in advance!
                  The answer is yes to both questions.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Hi, would these crops considered acceptable? Thank you in advance!
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by huytrando View Post
                      Hi, would these crops considered acceptable? Thank you in advance!
                      1. no
                      2. no
                      3. possibly, but better if you got more dof to actually get Rainier in focus.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I recently got this rejection due to bad info: aircraft. After appealing I was also rejected and the comment was "U206G Stationair 6 II". However the FAA's database, this blog "http://davidspeyers.blogspot.com/2008/06/turbo-206-pictures.html", and a few other websites stated that it's a TU206G Stationair. Did I miss something somewhere?
                        As promised, here are some shots of our new Turbo charged 206. These were taken during an inspection by the government. They had to check an...

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by huytrando View Post
                          I recently got this rejection due to bad info: aircraft. After appealing I was also rejected and the comment was "U206G Stationair 6 II". However the FAA's database, this blog "http://davidspeyers.blogspot.com/2008/06/turbo-206-pictures.html", and a few other websites stated that it's a TU206G Stationair. Did I miss something somewhere?
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9322955
                          This is the photo editing forum. Is there a question about the editing of the image?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X