Huy Do - Editting advices

[dlowwa]

I recently got this rejection due to bad info: aircraft. After appealing I was also rejected and the comment was "U206G Stationair 6 II". However the FAA's database, this blog "http://davidspeyers.blogspot.com/2008/06/turbo-206-pictures.html", and a few other websites stated that it's a TU206G Stationair. Did I miss something somewhere?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9322955

This is the photo editing forum. Is there a question about the editing of the image?

[huytrando]

I recently got this rejection due to bad info: aircraft. After appealing I was also rejected and the comment was "U206G Stationair 6 II". However the FAA's database, this blog "http://davidspeyers.blogspot.com/2008/06/turbo-206-pictures.html", and a few other websites stated that it's a TU206G Stationair. Did I miss something somewhere?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9322955

[dlowwa]

Hi, would these crops considered acceptable? Thank you in advance!

1. no
2. no
3. possibly, but better if you got more dof to actually get Rainier in focus.

[huytrando]

Hi, would these crops considered acceptable? Thank you in advance!

[dlowwa]

Would these two belows gonna be rejected for "similar", considering I already uploaded this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9332633
1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25285[/ATTACH]
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25286[/ATTACH]
And would these be considered "backlit"?
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25287[/ATTACH]
4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25288[/ATTACH]
5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25289[/ATTACH]
Thank you in advance!

The answer is yes to both questions.

[huytrando]

Would these two belows gonna be rejected for "similar", considering I already uploaded this one? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9332633
1.
2.
And would these be considered "backlit"?
3.
4.
5.
Thank you in advance!

[dlowwa]

Hello, I was wondering if these shots would be considered obstruction, and whether the last one should be upload as DQ-TFL reg? Best Regards.
1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24957[/ATTACH]
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24958[/ATTACH]
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24959[/ATTACH]

Yes, obstruction on the first two; use DQ-TFL on the third unless you have a wider crop, in which case Airport Overview - Ramp would be better.

[huytrando]

Hello, I was wondering if these shots would be considered obstruction, and whether the last one should be upload as DQ-TFL reg? Best Regards.
1.
2.
3.

[dlowwa]

Can I get pre-screen on these pics? Thank you in advance!
1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24271[/ATTACH]
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24272[/ATTACH]
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24273[/ATTACH]
4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24274[/ATTACH]
5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24275[/ATTACH]

1-2 borderline soft/compression in sky
3. soft/blurry
4-5 soft, contrast

[huytrando]

Can I get pre-screen on these pics? Thank you in advance!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

[dlowwa]

Can I get pre-screen on these, please? Thank you in advance!
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23019[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23020[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23021[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23022[/ATTACH]
5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]23023[/ATTACH]

1. blurry, compression
2. soft/blurry
3. soft, blurry, contrast
4. ok
5. blurry, contrast

[huytrando]

Can I get pre-screen on these, please? Thank you in advance!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

[dlowwa]

Hello, can I get some advices on the following pics, and whether the no. 1 or 2 pic would be better to submit into the queue? Thank you!
1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22969[/ATTACH]
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22970[/ATTACH]
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22971[/ATTACH]
4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22972[/ATTACH]
5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22973[/ATTACH]

1-2 similar
3. borderline centering
4. soft, contrast, obstruction
5. soft, contrast

[huytrando]

Hello, can I get some advices on the following pics, and whether the no. 1 or 2 pic would be better to submit into the queue? Thank you!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

[dlowwa]

I recently did a photo ops, and was wondering what kind of pics would be acceptable with the staircase attached. I couldn't help to noticed a few pics on JP were accepted with staircase's attached and was wondering if it's up to the personal preference of each screener?

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22860[/ATTACH] - longshot at best but I figured I'd include it in the pre-screen since it's a 777X.
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22859[/ATTACH]
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22861[/ATTACH] - was rejected for Obstructing objects/foreground cluster, which led me to the question above.
4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22862[/ATTACH]
5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]22863[/ATTACH]

Thank you in advance!

From the air, it is more subjective than from the ground, but generally the more obstruction, the less likely it is to be accepted. Of these 5, only #4 would have a good chance (#5 is backlit). #1 possibly also, simply for interest factor, since I believe that's the first image of the new 777. Without the obstruction on the nose, for me it would be totally fine since many people would like to see this aircraft, even with the airstairs blocking part. But with the scaffolding on the nose, the chances are less, and I would probably vote reject myself.