Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    You are correct, I will fix this for you.
    Thanks for this.

    I tried leveling and added more clockwise rotation as the screener wrote. No I used a fine raster to check with the red/white pole in the back. But it always looks strange. Then I took a ruler and left of the pole I had 0,2cm the whole pole. But on the right it was 0,3 and 0,4cm. Now I corrected the right side a bit and then I had left the discrepancy. Maybe the pole is so old (old military field) that I better use the windows which look good so far for me with the uploaded edit.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8617006
    ___________

    Sun was on the left of the photo and shining with the aircraft creating the nice shine but did not edit anything special then else on other photos
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8617089

    View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

    Comment


    • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
      I tried leveling and added more clockwise rotation as the screener wrote. No I used a fine raster to check with the red/white pole in the back. But it always looks strange. Then I took a ruler and left of the pole I had 0,2cm the whole pole. But on the right it was 0,3 and 0,4cm. Now I corrected the right side a bit and then I had left the discrepancy. Maybe the pole is so old (old military field) that I better use the windows which look good so far for me with the uploaded edit.
      All vertical references are leaning left, so needs CW rotation, probably around 1 degree.
      ___________

      Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
      Sun was on the left of the photo and shining with the aircraft creating the nice shine but did not edit anything special then else on other photos
      Slight editing halos and shadows a bit weak (which is consistent with the halo effect). Might also need a touch of CCW rotation.

      Comment


      • I leveled again with your suggestion but for me it looks not that better. Don't know why but the tower in the back seems to be always leaning to the side. But windows looking better now..

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4799.JPG
Views:	57
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1103684
        ______________
        Is this now better for the Aegan?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4951.JPG
Views:	49
Size:	1.17 MB
ID:	1103685
        View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

        Comment


        • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
          I leveled again with your suggestion but for me it looks not that better. Don't know why but the tower in the back seems to be always leaning to the side. But windows looking better now..

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4799.JPG
Views:	57
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1103684
          ______________
          Is this now better for the Aegan?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4951.JPG
Views:	49
Size:	1.17 MB
ID:	1103685
          1. I'd still give it a bit more CW, myself.
          2. better than previous. borderline still, but would be ok for me.

          Comment


          • I uploaded the picture as above but with a little bit more rotation as suggested by Dana but it was rejected with the comment that I rotated to the wrong direction. But with the horizon tool the windows leftside looking good. The pole is not adjustable in anyways, not even sure it is leveled in real life as its a former air base and not well maintained and partly destructed

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8644573
            View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

            Comment


            • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
              I uploaded the picture as above but with a little bit more rotation as suggested by Dana but it was rejected with the comment that I rotated to the wrong direction. But with the horizon tool the windows leftside looking good. The pole is not adjustable in anyways, not even sure it is leveled in real life as its a former air base and not well maintained and partly destructed

              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8644573
              There is no difference between the last one you posted that I said was still unlevel, and the one you actually uploaded, so not sure why this result would be surprising.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                There is no difference between the last one you posted that I said was still unlevel, and the one you actually uploaded, so not sure why this result would be surprising.
                The result is indeed surprising as it is not the same photo even you don't see one. You know about Lightroom editing history? I can see what I have did and at what time. And it is clear I exported to upload an 1hr after your response I made a change to the level (only around 0,2) and exported again. So its not the same...
                I also refered to the comment of the screener saying it need CCW rotation where the first screener said and you CW rotation.

                I tried on the original photo different options but they all look and feel not leveled. It seems impossible to get a result where JP and I are happy with. But there is another one
                Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4800.JPG Views:	0 Size:	1.60 MB ID:	1104301
                _______



                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5064.JPG
Views:	38
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1104302
                View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                Comment


                • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                  And it is clear I exported to upload an 1hr after your response I made a change to the level (only around 0,2)
                  Which is in effect such a small change (and in the wrong direction!!) as to be no difference.

                  Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                  I also refered to the comment of the screener saying it need CCW rotation where the first screener said and you CW rotation.
                  Maybe you should read the comments on the rejection again: "Needs CW rotation, not CCW." Perhaps you are the one who was a little unclear? I also clearly said I would give it more CW..but you did a miniscule adjustment in the OTHER direction.

                  Again, you made only the slightest of changes, in the wrong direction no less, so there should be no surprise as to the result from my point of view.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                    But there is another one
                    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_4800.JPG Views:	0 Size:	1.60 MB ID:	1104301
                    _______

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5064.JPG Views:	12 Size:	1.10 MB ID:	1104302
                    ?

                    You can see that the reg and parts of the aircraft are already getting stranges edges and also on the front door you see this and therefore more sharpening wouldn't the best idea.
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8677964
                    View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post

                      ?

                      You can see that the reg and parts of the aircraft are already getting stranges edges and also on the front door you see this and therefore more sharpening wouldn't the best idea.
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8677964
                      No news?
                      View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by StefBrat View Post

                        No news?
                        News about..?

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X