Originally posted by StefBrat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice
Collapse
X
-
I uploaded and was rejected after appealing only because the difference of "untitled" and "unknown". The comment was that the last only has to be used when the owner is unknown. So please tell me the owner...
I don't see the sense of rejection and then reupload again just for a word. Its no wonder the queue is so long when rejection for a word. And then reupload and screen as hot and so on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View PostI uploaded and was rejected after appealing only because the difference of "untitled" and "unknown". The comment was that the last only has to be used when the owner is unknown. So please tell me the owner...
Originally posted by StefBrat View PostI don't see the sense of rejection and then reupload again just for a word. Its no wonder the queue is so long when rejection for a word. And then reupload and screen as hot and so on.
Even so, rejecting the image rather than taking the time to correct it will, over the long run, take take much less time as the photographer can then learn how to correctly upload the image(s) in the future, and the crew won't need to spend time correcting bad info in the future.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostAppeal has already been made, and comment left so nothing to add.
Tell me now the different between untitled and unknown? These helicopter is not painted or something else. Its white and has a kind of "selling registry" or so. That would mean it's unknown. The "screener" said unknown applies if the operator is totally unknown. So what is the operator? If you seems to have better database ideas then tell me the correct one and I can reupload.
According to the rules unknown applies if there is no way to find the correct airline. That is the case.
By the way I checked some more information and there is nearly nothing. It had a Canadian registry but this was deleted in 2015 and when I took the photo in 07/2019 the FAA also canceled the registration already a month earlier. So it is unknown...
Also the photo was taken close a storage and scrapping area with some old planes and newer ones waiting for their dead. Maybe its already scrapped or stored or whatever. Or they sold the parts as the helicopter seems build in 1997 which is a bit old.
For untitled there is no description and "rule" in the guide but for it means aircrafts for scrapping or long term storage which having name and logos removed but basic coloursheme still applied. And maybe the old registry. Thats for me untitled.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
So you are not answering any questions? Good intention...
https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
"A couple of general requests: if you get a rejection you don't agree with, better to come here and get advice before appealing, not after. There is not much incentive to help those who disregard advice or appeal before asking for it."
Originally posted by StefBrat View PostTell me now the different between untitled and unknown? These helicopter is not painted or something else. Its white and has a kind of "selling registry" or so. That would mean it's unknown. The "screener" said unknown applies if the operator is totally unknown. So what is the operator? If you seems to have better database ideas then tell me the correct one and I can reupload.
According to the rules unknown applies if there is no way to find the correct airline. That is the case.
By the way I checked some more information and there is nearly nothing. It had a Canadian registry but this was deleted in 2015 and when I took the photo in 07/2019 the FAA also canceled the registration already a month earlier. So it is unknown...
Also the photo was taken close a storage and scrapping area with some old planes and newer ones waiting for their dead. Maybe its already scrapped or stored or whatever. Or they sold the parts as the helicopter seems build in 1997 which is a bit old.
For untitled there is no description and "rule" in the guide but for it means aircrafts for scrapping or long term storage which having name and logos removed but basic coloursheme still applied. And maybe the old registry. Thats for me untitled.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostSo you are not reading and/or deciding to ignore our requests? Good intentions
https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
.
Or I should ask for the definition of unknown and maybe the dictionary and others are wrong what that word means. Seems unknown has many meanings I maybe do not know.
Good thing: While I'm writing here it's all working time for me good thing to work in government
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
Last time I had opened a new thread it was linked into here with a similar problem. But then I open a new topic no problem. But its I nice I have arguments and also stated them a bit simply in the appeal and it seems no one cares.
Or I should ask for the definition of unknown and maybe the dictionary and others are wrong what that word means. Seems unknown has many meanings I maybe do not know.
Good thing: While I'm writing here it's all working time for me good thing to work in government
Really, you'll get a better answer than I'm able to provide by asking the crew responsible for editing the data on the DB, and they are very unlikely to reply to such a question here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostI was trying to hint that's not my area of expertise
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
-> used identical settings for sharpening and no noise reduction and also same for lightning settings as it came good out of RAW camera. So no need to tweak that much on that photo. Except basic things like we all do in lightroom. Maybe tail is a bit too dark at the rudder
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
-> used identical settings for sharpening and no noise reduction and also same for lightning settings as it came good out of RAW camera. So no need to tweak that much on that photo. Except basic things like we all do in lightroom. Maybe tail is a bit too dark at the rudder
Comment
-
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I can see in the photo the REG is slightly less sharper then the nose. But I looked into it with LR and 100% zoom and there it looked not that bad, also the focus points are good set. I also think its may caused by the engine blast. But the rest looks good with tires and engines and DHL titles.
____________
Will this drone be rejected because of obstructing? No other way is possible as it belongs to a company area and I only got clearence if not entering the "flowers", grass and stones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View Posthttps://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8556491
I can see in the photo the REG is slightly less sharper then the nose. But I looked into it with LR and 100% zoom and there it looked not that bad, also the focus points are good set. I also think its may caused by the engine blast. But the rest looks good with tires and engines and DHL titles.
____________
Will this drone be rejected because of obstructing? No other way is possible as it belongs to a company area and I only got clearence if not entering the "flowers", grass and stones.
im currently not seeing it on my screening screen, but here on the mac some parts like the lettering and tail appear to be soft.
Obstruction for the drone should no be a very big issue for me, as its preserved and probably no other possibility to get a full unobstructed shot.
Stay Safe!Best Regards from Germany,
Julian S.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Whats meant here? I think the screener refers to the license plates but there was no comment or something else. I blurred the plate, the one at the SUV was indeed good readable on the normal photo and the rest maybe a bit. So I edited this to get in line with the rules.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
____
Would this be considered as backlight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by StefBrat View PostWhats meant here? I think the screener refers to the license plates but there was no comment or something else. I blurred the plate, the one at the SUV was indeed good readable on the normal photo and the rest maybe a bit. So I edited this to get in line with the rules.
Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
Comment
Comment