Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    And the screenshot with 100% zoom:
    That looks quite soft, so it seems the rejection was correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    This photo was rejected because of soft but I on the screenshot below it looks good and when adding more sharpening even when adding to a specific area only will make lines with steps. The tailhook looks soft but the cabin and the rest looks good in normal size. The focus according the focus points is set and shutting speed with 1/400s for a slow taxiing plane should also more then enough.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9483733

    And the screenshot with 100% zoom:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	226.4 KB
ID:	1123674
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    I think the problem here is your exposure just increase it for fix, the slight dark nose has no issue, I have some pictures with dark nose due to the lighting similar to yours (from behind of a/c)

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    Probably the angle of the sun might be the issue here. The Magma is fulltime side on while being perfectly lit. The Asiana has a pretty dark nose, while being photographed a little more head on. Can be a difference maker at (as it seems) Zeppelinheim.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Originally posted by matteolamberts View Post
    Just check the histo on your Asiana -> gap on right side of histo -> means underexposure.
    I see what you mean even the final photo on my PC does not really show that "gap" I see here. I reuploaded it now. But with the Magma I still don't see the difference when comparing with other shots of that day from me. Even checked the sharpening but thats also same. Also the editing settings are generally the same as on the other shots, Aeroflog 777 and the Magma has same settings except brightness is more on the Magma and 0,05 less on the Aeroflot I have here uploaded (from today).

    Leave a comment:


  • matteolamberts
    replied
    Hi

    Just check the histo on your Asiana -> gap on right side of histo -> means underexposure.

    Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Is it because of the belly/gear is so dark? Because the nose cant be the problem as another shot was accepted and the sun is coming a bit from the side due the time of day?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9401541

    Is it because the title near the registration looks blurred or what is here the problem? I only used lightroom as on all pictures or did I oversee something?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9401567

    Leave a comment:


  • PabloGlez
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    First rejected with Bad info and no further notice and now undersharpen. Maybe it's coming from the engine why the tail is a bit soft as they done test flights no normal straight flights. But honestly why not saying that on the initial rejection. Then no need for another upload and now the post here.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9170473
    I am not a screener but I agree with the rejection, it is not cause of the engine heat, the whole helicopter is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    First rejected with Bad info and no further notice and now undersharpen. Maybe it's coming from the engine why the tail is a bit soft as they done test flights no normal straight flights. But honestly why not saying that on the initial rejection. Then no need for another upload and now the post here.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9170473

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    And why do I and maybe other users do not see that in the rejection? I believe you okay will reupload now but when the rejection page would show that there would be no need to ask here. Could save a bit of time for you.

    But thanks anyway...
    Yes, could have saved us all a bit of time if you had checked yourself:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8924396

    You and maybe other users do not see that in the rejection?

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    And why do I and maybe other users do not see that in the rejection? I believe you okay will reupload now but when the rejection page would show that there would be no need to ask here. Could save a bit of time for you.

    But thanks anyway...

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    Also for that, it says Bad Info SN Number. As usual it does not show the entered SN Number (since years). I checked the uploadform where FireFox saves my manual taken entries like reg an serial. And there the correct serial was insert which is 1416
    Maybe you checked the wrong FireFox manual taken entry uploadform:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	FireShot Capture 951 - JetPhotos Rejected Photo � Private Cirrus SR20 - www.jetphotos.com.png
Views:	61
Size:	27.7 KB
ID:	1110064

    Doesn't look like 1416 to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    News about..?
    About the post where I asked for screening advice. But now the old military plane is already accepted but still not sure with the Eurowings night shot.

    Also for that, it says Bad Info SN Number. As usual it does not show the entered SN Number (since years). I checked the uploadform where FireFox saves my manual taken entries like reg an serial. And there the correct serial was insert which is 1416
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8924396

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post

    No news?
    News about..?

    Leave a comment:


  • StefBrat
    replied
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post

    ?

    You can see that the reg and parts of the aircraft are already getting stranges edges and also on the front door you see this and therefore more sharpening wouldn't the best idea.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8677964
    No news?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X