Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Siddarth - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Thanks a lot Wilko. I fully agree.

    I'd like to add for 1) belly shots need some low sun or snow reflection or they will appear backlit as the sun isn't shinning on them.

    Alex

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
      Hello Siddarth.

      Not a screener, but maybe I can help you.

      At nr 1 the sun has been very high I assume, because all the bellys are dark, which can be explained as backlit.
      At nr 2 there are glares in the cockpit windows, which are destroying the sharpness especially inside the cockpit. Wondering if it's taken inside the teminal.
      Nr .3 should be defineteley taken from inside the terminal and through the glass, because there are many reflections visible caused by the glass you've taken it through.
      Nr 4 seems blurry especially towards the nose or you did too much sharpening?
      Nr 5 is leaning to the right. needs some ccw. I would use the pole close to the left part of minitrain (the small pole just in front of the power pylon) as my reference.

      Best Regards.

      Wilko
      Thanks a lot Wilko for the detailed feedback. Much appreciated.

      Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
      Thanks a lot Wilko. I fully agree.

      I'd like to add for 1) belly shots need some low sun or snow reflection or they will appear backlit as the sun isn't shinning on them.

      Alex
      Thanks Alex for guidance on belly shot uploads. Will keep this in mind for future uploads.

      Comment


      • #33
        Hi,

        Need some help with these rejects please:

        1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6363024: I am not shooting into the sun as can be seen from the shadows. There is light on our wing and all fuselages. I had re-worked the pic first for contrast and then sharpening

        2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6360059: For the motive, not enough aviation content or recognizable faces? Picked a pic where faces were not recognizable and processed only at 1200 px. I think I made a mistake with category by selecting 'Airport Overview'

        Thanks and regards,
        Siddarth

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
          Hi,

          Need some help with these rejects please:

          1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6363024: I am not shooting into the sun as can be seen from the shadows. There is light on our wing and all fuselages. I had re-worked the pic first for contrast and then sharpening

          2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6360059: For the motive, not enough aviation content or recognizable faces? Picked a pic where faces were not recognizable and processed only at 1200 px. I think I made a mistake with category by selecting 'Airport Overview'

          Thanks and regards,
          Siddarth
          Hey

          As you can see in the first picture, the shadows from the tails fall on the fuselages itself - the tails are in shadows, the result is backlit. Additional to that, itīs a bit oversharpened IMO.
          For the second picture, the focus is on the pier in the center of the picture. Itīs too distracting and this leads to the Motive rejection in result. Here are some examples of acceptable Terminal Shots: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/EFHK

          Hope this helps, have a nice start in the new week!
          Last edited by Julian S.; 2018-02-11, 18:54.
          Best Regards from Germany,
          Julian S.​

          Comment


          • #35
            Hi,

            Can I please get some advice on these rejects:

            1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423469 - since the wing is distinctly visible, I had used aircraft registration, Heathrow as airport and selected 'Airport Overview'

            2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6407119 - the aircraft was heavily pitching forward on approach. Try to make a collage of the sequence leading to the shot
            Click image for larger version

Name:	Sequence.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	59.7 KB
ID:	1022884

            Regards,
            Siddarth

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
              Hi,

              Can I please get some advice on these rejects:

              1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6423469 - since the wing is distinctly visible, I had used aircraft registration, Heathrow as airport and selected 'Airport Overview'

              2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6407119 - the aircraft was heavily pitching forward on approach. Try to make a collage of the sequence leading to the shot
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]14378[/ATTACH]

              Regards,
              Siddarth
              First one is fine with the info as you've submitted; I've accepted it. Second one is a bit more subjective. I would have been ok with it, but understand that others might not agree with the level. You can either appeal it, or rotate it slightly as suggested, and re-submit.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                First one is fine with the info as you've submitted; I've accepted it. Second one is a bit more subjective. I would have been ok with it, but understand that others might not agree with the level. You can either appeal it, or rotate it slightly as suggested, and re-submit.
                Thanks Dana for your help. Have a nice weekend.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Hi,

                  Can I get some advice if this pic can be fixed - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6599317.

                  Regards,
                  Siddarth

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
                    Hi,

                    Can I get some advice if this pic can be fixed - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6599317.

                    Regards,
                    Siddarth
                    Possibly. The blacks look quite washed out, so you might want to fix that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      Possibly. The blacks look quite washed out, so you might want to fix that.
                      Thanks Dana. Will try to fix that and re-upload.

                      Have a nice day.
                      Regards,
                      Siddarth

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hi,

                        Can I please get some help on fixing this pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6610485.

                        Regards,
                        Siddarth

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
                          Hi,

                          Can I please get some help on fixing this pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6610485.

                          Regards,
                          Siddarth
                          Contrast is too low, darks are all washed out.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	94846_1527960995.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1028720

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Hi,


                            Wish you all a very happy new year. Got back to processing and uploading after a break. Can I please get some help with these rejects:

                            1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034862 - received few rejects of similar kind. Is the 'over-exposed' rejection because of the light in window/roof panes? I felt the aircraft itself was well exposed. Any suggestions on how to fix the over-exposure coming only from the window panes

                            2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036772 - I will rework the sharpening and exposure, but did not understand the motive rejection. The Marine standing is a statue.

                            Regards,
                            Siddarth

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View Post
                              Hi,


                              Wish you all a very happy new year. Got back to processing and uploading after a break. Can I please get some help with these rejects:

                              1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034862 - received few rejects of similar kind. Is the 'over-exposed' rejection because of the light in window/roof panes? I felt the aircraft itself was well exposed. Any suggestions on how to fix the over-exposure coming only from the window panes

                              2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7036772 - I will rework the sharpening and exposure, but did not understand the motive rejection. The Marine standing is a statue.

                              Regards,
                              Siddarth
                              1. Exterior window is blown out. Probably not fixable.
                              2. Screener probably didn't realize it was part of the display. You can ignore the motive rejection.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Hi,

                                Warm greetings! Getting back to uploading after a break. Need help with this rejection for horizon - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7554803. I had used verticals of the hangar/lamp posts near the second Dreamlifter as reference.

                                Thanks and regards,
                                Siddarth

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X