Hi,
Can i please get some help on this reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8206877
Want to confirm that the spots marked in the equalized shot below are the culprits.
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Siddarth - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
It also depends how much of the sign/rope is blocking for temporary obstructions, but thinking is if we have many other un-obstructed images of the same aircraft (likely not from airshows), then there isn't much incentive to accept ones that are obstructed.
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View PostHi,
Need feedback on this reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8155030
Given that it is an air show and there is a rope perimeter and supporting cones around the aircraft, i tried the best composition possible so that cones are not obstructing the landing gear; from any angle the cones could not be avoided. I myself in the past have uploaded pics from air shows similar to this. Is not acceptable to have such shots any more?
Thanks for your advice as always.
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Need feedback on this reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8155030
Given that it is an air show and there is a rope perimeter and supporting cones around the aircraft, i tried the best composition possible so that cones are not obstructing the landing gear; from any angle the cones could not be avoided. I myself in the past have uploaded pics from air shows similar to this. Is not acceptable to have such shots any more?
Thanks for your advice as always.
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
The verticals on both photos are slightly unlevel.
Have a nice weekend.
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View PostHi,
Can i please get some help on these two rejects on reference to used to level the shots
1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7902121 - I had used verticals from the building below the control tower
2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7903414 - Vertical lines from the roof of the Marriott used to level the shot
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Can i please get some help on these two rejects on reference to used to level the shots
1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7902121 - I had used verticals from the building below the control tower
2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7903414 - Vertical lines from the roof of the Marriott used to level the shot
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View PostHi,
Will rework the contrast, but wanted to check if the composition was not acceptable - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7806877. I had offset the foreground aicraft so as to be able to capture the 'more interesting' livery in background.
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Will rework the contrast, but wanted to check if the composition was not acceptable - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7806877. I had offset the foreground aicraft so as to be able to capture the 'more interesting' livery in background.
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Can i please get pre-screening advice for these pics.
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View PostHi,
Happy Monday! Can i please get some help on fixing this second time reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7746610. I can reprocess and further reduce the sharpening, but what must be the reference to level the shot?
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
Happy Monday! Can i please get some help on fixing this second time reject - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7746610. I can reprocess and further reduce the sharpening, but what must be the reference to level the shot?
Regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Siddarth.Bhandary View PostHi,
I had this reject for backlit - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7709815. I am sure the sun was behind at that time of the day and you can see from little bit of the tail that is peeping out that it is well illuminated. I felt that rejection was a bit harsh for an under-belly shot.
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Biggest Part of the Aircraft is in its own shadow what is the reason for the "backlit".
Regards.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I had this reject for backlit - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7709815. I am sure the sun was behind at that time of the day and you can see from little bit of the tail that is peeping out that it is well illuminated. I felt that rejection was a bit harsh for an under-belly shot.
Thanks and regards,
Siddarth
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: